diff --git a/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.ch05.html b/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.ch05.html
index 21051d1cad..b59c4b33fe 100644
--- a/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.ch05.html
+++ b/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.ch05.html
@@ -10582,7 +10582,8 @@ example.com. NS ns2.example.net.
identity field.
The name field
is ignored, but should be the same as the
- identity field.
+ identity field or
+ "."
The self nametype is
most useful when allowing using one key per
name to update, where the key has the same
@@ -10634,7 +10635,7 @@ example.com. NS ns2.example.net.
and converts it machine.realm allowing the machine
to update machine.realm. The REALM to be matched
is specified in the identity
- field.
+ field. The name field should be set to "."
identity
- field.
+ field. The name field should be set to "."
@@ -10685,7 +10686,8 @@ example.com. NS ns2.example.net.
converts it to machine.realm allowing the machine
to update subdomains of machine.realm. The REALM
to be matched is specified in the
- identity field.
+ identity field. The
+ name field should be set to "."
@@ -10700,7 +10702,8 @@ example.com. NS ns2.example.net.
Allow updates that have been sent via TCP and
for which the standard mapping from the initiating
IP address into the IN-ADDR.ARPA and IP6.ARPA
- namespaces match the name to be updated.
+ namespaces match the name to be updated. The
+ name field should be set to "."
Addresses could be referenced after being freed during resolver processing, causing an assertion failure. The chances of this @@ -90,7 +91,17 @@ resolution increased them. This bug is disclosed in CVE-2017-3145. [RT #46839]
-+ update-policy rules that otherwise ignore the name field now + require that it be set to "." to ensure that any type list + present is properly interpreted. If the name field was omitted + from the rule declaration and a type list was present it wouldn't + be interpreted as expected. +
+Addresses could be referenced after being freed during resolver processing, causing an assertion failure. The chances of this @@ -52,7 +53,17 @@ resolution increased them. This bug is disclosed in CVE-2017-3145. [RT #46839]
-+ update-policy rules that otherwise ignore the name field now + require that it be set to "." to ensure that any type list + present is properly interpreted. If the name field was omitted + from the rule declaration and a type list was present it wouldn't + be interpreted as expected. +
+