forgejo/tests/e2e/fixtures
Andreas Ahlenstorf d8534ba123 feat: scope-specific headings for list of recent tasks (#11690)
As requested in https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11516#issuecomment-11430034, the headings of the list of recent tasks that were executed on a particular runner now indicate that only tasks are listed that originated in the current scope.

## Checklist

The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).

### Tests for Go changes

(can be removed for JavaScript changes)

- I added test coverage for Go changes...
  - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
  - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I ran...
  - [x] `make pr-go` before pushing

### Tests for JavaScript changes

(can be removed for Go changes)

- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
  - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
  - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).

### Documentation

- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.

### Release notes

- [x] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change.
- [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change.

*The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.*

The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11690
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
Co-committed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
2026-03-17 03:02:09 +01:00
..
runner-management feat: scope-specific headings for list of recent tasks (#11690) 2026-03-17 03:02:09 +01:00
attachment.yml feat(ui): add quota overview (#6602) 2025-02-26 14:36:53 +00:00
comment.yml fix: correct image source for quoted reply (#8565) 2025-07-19 15:03:10 +02:00
quota_group.yml feat(ui): add quota overview (#6602) 2025-02-26 14:36:53 +00:00
quota_group_mapping.yml feat(ui): add quota overview (#6602) 2025-02-26 14:36:53 +00:00
quota_group_rule_mapping.yml fix: quota evaluation rules not working properly (#9033) 2025-09-08 01:05:55 +02:00
quota_rule.yml fix: quota evaluation rules not working properly (#9033) 2025-09-08 01:05:55 +02:00
repo_unit.yml fix: use scrollHeight for rendered iframe if offsetHeight is unavailable (#9508) 2025-10-16 15:51:57 +02:00
repository.yml fix: reduce deadlocks merging PRs by using caching for repo issue count stats (#9922) 2025-10-31 23:50:05 +01:00
review.yml feat: Add partial quoting 2024-10-26 19:15:43 +02:00