mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2026-02-03 20:51:07 -05:00
22b5dfdaf1
Related to #11035, this test case used `require.Errorf()` where it could use `require.Error()` to make it clear that this is not a case of confusion with `require.ErrorContains()` The other cases in the same function already use `require.Error()`, so this clearly looks like a consistency glitch. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11037 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nils Goroll <nils.goroll@uplex.de> Co-committed-by: Nils Goroll <nils.goroll@uplex.de> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| testdata | ||
| helper.go | ||
| helper_test.go | ||
| local.go | ||
| local_test.go | ||
| minio.go | ||
| minio_test.go | ||
| storage.go | ||
| storage_test.go | ||