Willy Tarreau 1a53a3af13 MINOR: checks: improve handling of the servers tracking chain ... Server tracking uses the same "tracknext" list for servers tracking another one and for the servers being tracked. This caused an issue which was fixed by commit f39c71c ([CRITICAL] fix server state tracking: it was O(n!) instead of O(n)), consisting in ensuring that a server is being checked before walking down the list, so that we don't propagate the up/down information via servers being part of the track chain. But the root cause is the fact that all servers share the same list. The correct solution consists in having a list head for the tracked servers and a list of next tracking servers. This simplifies the propagation logic, especially for the case where status changes might be passed to individual servers via the CLI.		2013-12-14 16:02:18 +01:00
..
common	BUILD: definitely silence some stupid GCC warnings	2013-12-13 15:21:36 +01:00
import	[MAJOR] replace ultree with ebtree in wait-queues	2008-06-24 08:17:16 +02:00
proto	MINOR: sample: make sample_parse_expr() use memprintf() to report parse errors	2013-12-12 23:16:54 +01:00
types	MINOR: checks: improve handling of the servers tracking chain	2013-12-14 16:02:18 +01:00