kubernetes/pkg/proxy/userspace/OWNERS

# See the OWNERS docs at https://go.k8s.io/owners

approvers:
- sig-network-approvers
reviewers:
- sig-network-reviewers
- lavalamp
- smarterclayton
labels:
- sig/network
Updated OWNERS files to include link to docs 2019-01-30 14:05:00 -05:00			`# See the OWNERS docs at https://go.k8s.io/owners`

proxy/userspace: add dcbw and danwinship to OWNERS approvers Per recommendation of @thockin: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/71735#pullrequestreview-189515580 --- IMO this code is as dead as it could be. The only significant user is OpenShift as far as I know. I'd rather never touch it again, but I know that is not realistic. Also, it seems like maybe this could be broken into a couple commits for easier review? I raised some questions about this design, but I think you should add yourselves as approvers in OWNERS for this subdir. If it evolves, I will lose context on the impl. I don't think it is covered by e2e, either (more argument for breaking it to a separate repo and having its own e2e tests) --- 2019-04-08 13:38:22 -04:00			`approvers:`
pkg/proxy: add sig-network-approvers/sig-network-reviewers to OWNERS files This PR also adds m1093782566 (Jun Du) to sig-network-reviewers in recognition of his contributions to the proxy. 2019-05-07 17:09:16 -04:00			`- sig-network-approvers`
Update OWNERS approvers and reviewers: pkg/proxy 2016-11-09 13:17:55 -05:00			`reviewers:`
pkg/proxy: add sig-network-approvers/sig-network-reviewers to OWNERS files This PR also adds m1093782566 (Jun Du) to sig-network-reviewers in recognition of his contributions to the proxy. 2019-05-07 17:09:16 -04:00			`- sig-network-reviewers`
Update OWNERS approvers and reviewers: pkg/proxy 2016-11-09 13:17:55 -05:00			`- lavalamp`
			`- smarterclayton`
OWNERS: add label:sig/network to a bunch of places 2018-12-19 00:59:33 -05:00			`labels:`
			`- sig/network`