When "send password by Talk" was disabled in a mail share it was
possible to keep the same password as before, as it does not pose any
security issue (unlike keeping it when "send password by Talk" is
enabled, as in that case the password was already disclosed by mail).
However, if a mail share is updated but the password is not set again
only the hashed password will be available. In that case it would not
make sense to send the password by mail, so now the password must be
changed when disabling "send password by Talk".
Note that, even if explicitly setting the same password again along with
the "send password by Talk" property would work, this was also prevented
for simplicity.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
When "send password by Talk" is enabled in a mail share a new password
must be also set. However, when the passwords of the original and the
new share were compared it was not taken into account that the original
password is now hashed, while the new one is not (unless no new password
was sent, in which case the password of the original share was set in
the new share by the controller, but that was already prevented due to
both passwords being literally the same), so it was possible to set the
same password again.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
When "send password by Talk" is enabled in a link share now a non empty
password is enforced.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Before the resources/config/ca-bundle.crt was only used when the list of custom
certificates was empty and the instance was not installed. But it should also
be used when the list is empty and the instance is installed.
This is inverting the logic to stop if the instance is not installed to use the
default bundle. And it also does this when the list is empty.
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
In test it reduced the transfered data from 5 MB to 2 MB. This should reduce the load on the appstore significantly.
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
Since we don't care if it is human readbale.
The code is backwards compatible with the old format.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
The minimum for memory cost is 8 KiB per thread. Threads must be checked and set first to allow checking against the correct memory cost mimimum.
Options are now applied the following way:
- If config.php contains the setting with an integer higher or equal to the minimum, it is applied.
- If config.php contains the setting with an integer lower than the minimum, the minimum is applied.
- If config.php does not contain the setting or with no integer value, the PHP default is applied.
Signed-off-by: MichaIng <micha@dietpi.com>
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
these are actually expected to FAIL, because NULL as a userid is not
allowed in the schema, but documented to be used on the source
Signed-off-by: Arthur Schiwon <blizzz@arthur-schiwon.de>
behat/mink 1.8 and behat/mink-selenium2-driver 1.4 introduced behaviour
changes that broke the acceptance tests. Until the tests are updated to
work with the newer versions the last known versions are forced.
Note that some acceptance tests still fail after enforcing the
compatible versions, although that is caused by changes in the Nextcloud
server itself.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Env-based SAML uses the "Apache auth" mechanism to log users in. In this
code path, we first delete all existin auth tokens from the database,
before a new one is inserted. This is problematic for concurrent
requests as they might reach the same code at the same time, hence both
trying to insert a new row wit the same token (the session ID). This
also bubbles up and disables user_saml.
As the token might still be OK (both request will insert the same data),
we can actually just check if the UIDs of the conflict row is the same
as the one we want to insert right now. In that case let's just use the
existing entry and carry on.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Wurst <christoph@winzerhof-wurst.at>
the target storage doesn't need additional handling for wrappers as the wrappers implementation of moveFromStorage already deals with that
Any storage based on local storage isn't affected by this as local storage already has it's own way of handling with this
Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <robin@icewind.nl>
Now the link share menu is not automatically opened after a link share
is created, so waiting until it was opened failed in iShareTheLinkFor.
Note that the steps that interact with the link share menu take care
themselves of showing the menu if needed, so there is no need to
explicitly show it despite the change. Also, the waiting in
iShareTheLinkFor was introduced when the link share menu was changed
to automatically open after creating a link share, as that caused some
issues with the steps that opened the menu by themselves (fec8d12fc5).
Due to all this, now that the link share menu is again not automatically
opened the wait can be simply removed.
Signed-off-by: Greta Doci <gretadoci@gmail.com>
