Updating a user or group share now uses the correct method for the
validation of the expiration date. Instead of using the one from links
it uses the one for internal shares.
To avoid future confusion, the method "validateExpirationDate" has been
renamed to "validateExpirationDateLink".
Signed-off-by: Vincent Petry <vincent@nextcloud.com>
As "composer.lock" was not versioned the dependencies had to be resolved
everytime that the acceptance tests run, which took some precious time.
Besides that the dependency versions were also tightened for better
control.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
This shows in a clearer way that the expected expiration date is the
original one, but without time.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
This adds back what was being actually tested in the unit test fixed in
the previous commit.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The expiration date was explicitly given, so it was not testing what it
should. Moreover, "link_defaultExpDays" needs to be mapped when testing
the default value (even if it will just fallback to the value of
"shareapi_expire_after_n_days").
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The enforced expiration date was not actually enabled, as for that
"shareapi_default_expire_date" needs to be explicitly set to "yes".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The test should fail if no exception was thrown, and no exception was
thrown due to a missing configuration parameter. However, the use of
"addToAssertionCount(1)" made the test pass even if no exception was
thrown and, therefore, to silently fail.
Now the missing configuration parameter was added and the test will fail
if the expected exception is not thrown.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
On some systems with a lot of users this creates a lot of extra DB
writes.
Being able to increase this interval helps there.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
When a row is added to the file list the opacity of the file row is
animated from transparent to fully opaque. As the file actions menu is a
descendant of the row but overflows it when the row is not fully opaque
clicks on the menu entries "fall-through" and are received instead by
the rows behind.
The opacity animation is a CSS animation, and it is not possible to know
if a row is appearing or not except from its opacity (the row will have
the "appear" CSS class even after the animation ended). Therefore it
should be waited until the row of the file is fully opaque before using
the menu.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
