Split cpuset_getaffinity() into a two counterparts, where the
user_cpuset_getaffinity() is intended to operate on the cpuset_t from
user va, while kern_cpuset_getaffinity() expects the cpuset from kernel
va.
Accordingly, the code that clears the high bits is moved to the
user_cpuset_getaffinity(). Linux sched_getaffinity() syscall returns
the size of set copied to the user-space and then glibc wrapper clears
the high bits.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Rename the "copyin" and "copyout" fields of struct cpuset_copy_cb to
something less generic, since sanitizers define interceptors for
copyin() and copyout() using #define.
Reported by: syzbot+2db5d644097fc698fb6f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 47a57144af ("cpuset: Byte swap cpuset for compat32 on big endian architectures")
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Linux has more tolerant checks of the user supplied cpuset_t's.
Minimum cpuset_t size that the Linux kernel permits in case of
getaffinity() is the maximum CPU id, present in the system / NBBY,
the maximum size is not limited.
For setaffinity(), Linux does not limit the size of the user-provided
cpuset_t, internally using only the meaningful part of the set, where
the upper bound is the maximum CPU id, present in the system, no larger
than the size of the kernel cpuset_t.
Unlike FreeBSD, Linux ignores high bits if set in the setaffinity(),
so clear it in the sched_setaffinity() and Linuxulator itself.
Reviewed by: Pau Amma (man pages)
In collaboration with: jhb
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D34849
MFC after: 2 weeks
There are many places where we copyin Linux timespec from the userspace
and then convert it to the kernel timespec. To avoid code duplication
add a tiny halper for doing this.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Assuming the kernel would use random data, the 64-bit Linux kernel ignores
upper 32 bits of tv_nsec of struct timespec64 for 32-bit binaries.
MFC after: 2 weeks
There are many places where we convert natvie timespec and copyout it to
the userspace. To avoid code duplication add a tiny halper for doing this.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Historically 32-bit Linuxulator under amd64 emulated the real i386
behavior. Since 3d8dd983 the old i386 Linux world can't be used under
amd64 Linuxulator as it don't know anything about amd64 machine (which
is returned now by newuname() syscall). So, add a knob to allow to swith
the behavior and use i386 Linux binaries on amd64.
Set knob to the new behavior as I think this is common to the modern
Linux distros.
Reviewed by: Pau Amma (doc), emaste
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D34708
MFC after: 2 weeks
Since Linux 5.4, if id is zero, then wait for any child that is in the same
process grop as the caller's process group.
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31567
MFC after: 2 weeks
As FreeBSD does not have __WALL option bit analogue explicitly set all
possible option bits to emulate Linux __WALL wait option bit.
Reviewed by: emaste
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31555
MFC after: 2 weeks
Don't emit messages; this isn't any different from a Linux kernel
built without OPTIONS_SECCOMP, so the userspace already needs to know
how to deal with it. This is also similar with how we handle seccomp
in linux_prctl().
Sponsored By: EPSRC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33808
Don't emit warnings; this isn't any different from a Linux kernel
built without OPTIONS_SECCOMP, so the userspace already needs to know
how to deal with it. This is also similar with how we handle seccomp
in linux_prctl().
Sponsored By: EPSRC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33808
This moves linux_ptrace.c from sys/amd64/linux/ to sys/compat/linux/,
making it possible to use it on architectures other than amd64.
It also enables Linux ptrace(2) on arm64.
Relnotes: yes
Sponsored By: EPSRC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32868
This makes prctl(2) support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, by mapping it
to the native PROC_NO_NEW_PRIVS_CTL procctl(2).
Sponsored By: EPSRC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30973
Assuming we can't run on i486, i586 class cpu, retire linux_kplatform var
and use hardcoded 'machine' value in linux_newuname().
I have added linux_kplatform for consistency with linux_platform which is
placed in to vdso to avoid excess copyout it on stack for AT_PLATFORM at
exec time.
This is the first stage of Linuxulator's vdso revision.
Reviewed by: trasz, imp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30774
MFC after: 2 weeks
For now the Linux emulation layer uses in kernel ppoll(2) without
conversion of user supplied fd 'events', and does not convert the
kernel supplied fd 'revents'.
At least POLLRDHUP is handled by FreeBSD differently than by
Linux. Seems that Linux silencly ignores POLLRDHUP on non socket fd's
unlike FreeBSD, which does more strictly check and fails.
Rework the Linux ppoll, using kern_poll and converting 'events'
and 'revents' values.
While here, move poll events defines to the MI part of code as they
mostly identical on all arches except arm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30716
MFC after: 2 weeks
Move dtrace SDT definitions into linux_common module code. Also, build
linux_dummy.c into the linux_common kld -- we don't need separate
versions of these stubs for 32- and 64-bit emulation.
Reported by: several
PR: 250897
Discussed with: emaste, trasz
Tested by: John Kennedy, Yasuhiro KIMURA, Oleg Sidorkin
X-MFC-With: r367395
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27124
Proxy the flag to the roughly analogous FreeBSD procctl 'TRACE'.
TRACE-disabled processes are not coredumped, and Linux !DUMPABLE processes
can not be ptraced. There are some additional semantics around ownership of
files in the /proc/[pid] pseudo-filesystem, which we do not attempt to
emulate correctly at this time.
Reviewed by: markj (earlier version)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27015
Turns out the dummy rlimits fix prlimit(1), but break su(8)
(login-1:4.5-1ubuntu2) - although not sudo(8), for some reason.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26814
