GCC emits a warning about shadowing a builtin with our mempcpy
declaration, so switch it to using the same model as memcpy() and
use the apparently-existing __builtin___mempcpy_chk().
Reviewed by: kib (earlier version), markj
Sponsored by: Klara, Inc.
Sponsored by: Stormshield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D45976
ssp/ssp.h needed some improvements:
- `len` isn't always a size_t, it may need casted
- In some cases we may want to use a len that isn't specified as a
parameter (e.g., L_ctermid), so __ssp_redirect() should be more
flexible.
- In other cases we may want additional checking, so pull all of the
declaration bits out of __ssp_redirect_raw() so that some functions
can implement the body themselves.
strlcat/strlcpy should be the last of the fortified functions that get
their own __*_chk symbols, and these cases are only done to be
consistent with the rest of the str*() set.
Reviewed by: markj
Sponsored by: Klara, Inc.
Sponsored by: Stormshield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D45679
This is a mostly-unmodified copy of the various *_chk implementations
and headers from NetBSD, without yet modifying system headers to start
actually including them. A future commit will also apply the needed
bits to fix ssp/unistd.h.
Reviewed by: imp, pauamma_gundo.com (both previous versions), kib
Sponsored by: Stormshield
Sponsored by: Klara, Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32306
The comment in the libc/sys symbol map referenced the generated symbols
for the syscall trampolines. Such comment was out of place in the secure
symbol map so remove the stale comment and attempt to clarify the old one
to avoid risks of confusion.
Pointed out by: kib
As part of the code refactoring to support FORTIFY_SOURCE we want
a new subdirectory "secure" to keep the files related to security.
Move the stack protector functions to this new directory.
No functional change.
Differential Review: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3333
