We've removed kernel option EXT_RESOURCES almost two years ago.
While it was ok to have some code under a common 'extres' subdirectory
at first, we now have a lot of consumer of it and we made it mandatory
so no need to have it under a cryptic name.
Reviewed by: mhorne
Sponsored by: Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43196
We've removed kernel option EXT_RESOURCES almost two years ago.
While it was ok to have some code under a common 'extres' subdirectory
at first, we now have a lot of consumer of it and we made it mandatory
so no need to have it under a cryptic name.
Reviewed by: emaste, imp
Sponsored by: Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43195
We've removed kernel option EXT_RESOURCES almost two years ago.
While it was ok to have some code under a common 'extres' subdirectory
at first, we now have a lot of consumer of it and we made it mandatory
so no need to have it under a cryptic name.
Reviewed by: imp
Sponsored by: Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43192
We've removed kernel option EXT_RESOURCES almost two years ago.
While it was ok to have some code under a common 'extres' subdirectory
at first, we now have a lot of consumer of it and we made it mandatory
so no need to have it under a cryptic name.
Reviewed by: mhorne
Sponsored by: Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43191
dwc3 is big enough to have its own subdirectory.
While here only make it depend on kernel option dwc3 and rk_dwc3
without any SOC options.
Sponsored by: Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43190
