The feature bits are exposed as a 32-bit register with 2 banks, so we
should negotiate both halves. Notably, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 is in the
upper half, and will be used in an upcoming commit.
The PCI bus driver also has this bug, but the legacy BAR layout did not
include selector registers and is rather different from the modern
layout, so it remains solely as legacy.
Reviewed by: br, brooks (mentor), jhb (mentor)
Approved by: br, brooks (mentor), jhb (mentor)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25131
The non-legacy virtio MMIO specification drops the use of PFNs and
replaces them with physical addresses. Whilst many implementations are
so-called transitional devices, also implementing the legacy
specification, TinyEMU[1] does not. Device-specific configuration
registers have also changed to being little-endian, and must be accessed
using a single aligned access for registers up to 32 bits, and two
32-bit aligned accesses for 64-bit registers.
[1] https://bellard.org/tinyemu/
Reviewed by: br, brooks (mentor)
Approved by: br, brooks (mentor)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24681
When we register an interrupt handler we need to pass the intr_type along in
bus_setup_intr().
The interrupt type matters because it is used to decide if we need to enter
NET_EPOCH. That meant that vtmmio-based if_vtnet did not, which led to panics
with INVARIANTS set.
Sponsored by: Axiado
We want to allocate a contiguous memory block anywhere in memory, but
expressed this as having to be between 0 and 0xffffffff. This limits us
on 64-bit machines, and outright breaks on machines where memory is
mapped above that address range.
Allow the full address range to be used for this allocation.
Sponsored by: Axiado
Expose the same fields and widths from both vtio buses, even though they
don't quite line up; several virtio drivers can attach to both buses,
and sharing a PNP info table for both seems more convenient.
In practice, I doubt any virtio driver really needs to match on anything
other than bus and device_type (eliminating the unused entries for
vtmmio), and also in practice device_type is << 2^16 (so far, values
range from 1 to 20). So it might be fine to only expose a 16-bit
device_type for PNP purposes. On the other hand, I don't see much harm
in overkill here.
Reviewed by: bryanv, markj (earlier version)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20406
This allows the memory mapped I/O virtio driver to attach when we boot
with ACPI tables, for example in some cases with QEMU emulating arm64.
MFC after: 1 month
original initialization, so we don't miss few registers to
configure.
This fixes vtnet(4) operation with QEMU's virtio-net-device.
Tested in QEMU with FreeBSD/RISC-V.
Reviewed by: bryanv
Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15821
Uses of mallocarray(9).
The use of mallocarray(9) has rocketed the required swap to build FreeBSD.
This is likely caused by the allocation size attributes which put extra pressure
on the compiler.
Given that most of these checks are superfluous we have to choose better
where to use mallocarray(9). We still have more uses of mallocarray(9) but
hopefully this is enough to bring swap usage to a reasonable level.
Reported by: wosch
PR: 225197
Focus on code where we are doing multiplications within malloc(9). None of
these is likely to overflow, however the change is still useful as some
static checkers can benefit from the allocation attributes we use for
mallocarray.
This initial sweep only covers malloc(9) calls with M_NOWAIT. No good
reason but I started doing the changes before r327796 and at that time it
was convenient to make sure the sorrounding code could handle NULL values.
o Move similar block/networking methods to common file
o Follow r275640 and correct MMIO registers width
o Pass value to MMIO platform_note method.
Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
There are two main parts to get it to work, 1) most of the register
accesses need to be word sized, other than the config register which
needs to be byte aligned, and 2) we don't need the platform driver
for this to work on the Foundation Model, allow it to be NULL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1240
Reviewed by: bryanv
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
