Now in the case when one-shot timers are used cyclic events should fire
closer to theier scheduled times. As the cyclic is currently used only
to drive DTrace profile provider, this is the area where the change
makes a difference.
Reviewed by: mav (earlier version, a while ago)
X-MFC after: clocksource/eventtimer subsystem
cpuset_t objects.
That is going to offer the underlying support for a simple bump of
MAXCPU and then support for number of cpus > 32 (as it is today).
Right now, cpumask_t is an int, 32 bits on all our supported architecture.
cpumask_t on the other side is implemented as an array of longs, and
easilly extendible by definition.
The architectures touched by this commit are the following:
- amd64
- i386
- pc98
- arm
- ia64
- XEN
while the others are still missing.
Userland is believed to be fully converted with the changes contained
here.
Some technical notes:
- This commit may be considered an ABI nop for all the architectures
different from amd64 and ia64 (and sparc64 in the future)
- per-cpu members, which are now converted to cpuset_t, needs to be
accessed avoiding migration, because the size of cpuset_t should be
considered unknown
- size of cpuset_t objects is different from kernel and userland (this is
primirally done in order to leave some more space in userland to cope
with KBI extensions). If you need to access kernel cpuset_t from the
userland please refer to example in this patch on how to do that
correctly (kgdb may be a good source, for example).
- Support for other architectures is going to be added soon
- Only MAXCPU for amd64 is bumped now
The patch has been tested by sbruno and Nicholas Esborn on opteron
4 x 12 pack CPUs. More testing on big SMP is expected to came soon.
pluknet tested the patch with his 8-ways on both amd64 and i386.
Tested by: pluknet, sbruno, gianni, Nicholas Esborn
Reviewed by: jeff, jhb, sbruno
In this case we call target function only on a single CPU and do not
need any synchronization at the setup stage.
It's a bit non-obvious but setup function of NULL means that
smp_rendezvous_cpus waits for all CPUs to arrive at the rendezvous
point, but without doing any actual setup. While using
smp_no_rendevous_barrier means that each CPU proceeds on its own
schedule without any synchronization whatsoever.
MFC after: 3 weeks
