Doug Barton a32bb1b53a When newfs'ing a partition with UFS2 that had previously been newfs'ed ... with UFS1, the UFS1 superblocks were not deleted. This allowed any RELENG_4 (or other non-UFS2-aware) fsck to think it knew how to "fix" the file system, resulting in severe data scrambling. This patch is a more advanced version than the one originally submitted. Lukas improved it based on feedback from Kirk, and testing by me. It blanks all UFS1 superblocks (if any) during a UFS2 newfs, thereby causing fsck's that are not UFS2 aware to generate the "SEARCH FOR ALTERNATE SUPER-BLOCK FAILED" message, and exit without damaging the fs. PR: bin/51619 Submitted by: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at> Reviewed by: kirk Approved by: re (scottl)		2003-05-22 18:38:54 +00:00
..
Makefile	Convert newfs to libufs (really). Solves one real issue with previous	2003-02-11 03:06:45 +00:00
mkfs.c	When newfs'ing a partition with UFS2 that had previously been newfs'ed	2003-05-22 18:38:54 +00:00
newfs.8	Remove reference to diskpart(8)	2003-04-20 19:16:21 +00:00
newfs.c	Use __FBSDID() to quiet GCC 3.3 warnings.	2003-05-03 18:41:59 +00:00
newfs.h	Correct lines incorrectly added to the copyright message. Add missing period.	2003-02-14 21:08:14 +00:00
ref.test	Fix the -R flag so that it provides sequential "random" numbers	2003-02-22 23:26:11 +00:00
runtest00.sh	Add the undocumented -R option to disable randomness for regression-testing.	2002-03-19 21:05:29 +00:00
runtest01.sh	Add the undocumented -R option to disable randomness for regression-testing.	2002-03-19 21:05:29 +00:00