Now that I understand what's going on with this, I've realised that
it's going to be quite difficult to implement a processq method in
the EDMA case. Because there's a separate TX status FIFO, I can't
just run processq() on each EDMA TXQ to see what's finished.
i have to actually run the TX status queue and handle individual
TXQs.
So:
* unmethodize ath_tx_processq();
* leave ath_tx_draintxq() as a method, as it only uses the completion status
for debugging rather than actively completing the frames (ie, all frames
here are failed);
* Methodize ath_draintxq().
The EDMA ath_draintxq() will have to take care of running the TX
completion FIFO before (potentially) freeing frames in the queue.
The only two places where ath_tx_draintxq() (on a single TXQ) are used:
* ath_draintxq(); and
* the CABQ handling in the beacon setup code - it drains the CABQ before
populating the CABQ with frames for a new beacon (when doing multi-VAP
operation.)
So it's quite possible that once I methodize the CABQ and beacon handling,
I can just drop ath_tx_draintxq() in its entirety.
Finally, it's also quite possible that I can remove ath_tx_draintxq()
in the future and just "teach" it to not check the status when doing
EDMA.
788e6aa99c