Kyle Evans cb99e93575 pkgbase: resolve mailer.conf conflict WITHOUT_SENDMAIL ... When WITHOUT_SENDMAIL is set, we end up with two different mailer.conf that conflict, and hilarity ensues. There's currently three different places that we might install mailer.conf: - ^/etc/Makefile (package=runtime, contingent on MK_MAIL != no) - ^/libexec/dma/dmagent/Makefile (package=dma, contingent on MK_SENDMAIL != no) - ^/usr.sbin/mailwrapper/Makefile (package=utilities, contingent on not-installed) The mailwrapper installation will effectively never happen because the ^/etc one will first. This patch simplifies the whole situation; remove the ^/etc/Makefile version and install it primarily in mailwrapper if MK_MAILWRAPPER != "no". The scenarios covered in mailwrapper are: - sendmail(8) is installed, dma(8) may or may not be installed - neither sendmail(8) nor dma(8) is installed In the first scenario, sendmail(8) is dominant so we can go ahead and install the version in ^/etc/mail. In the unlisted scenario, sendmail(8) is not installed but dma(8) is, we'll let ^/libexec/dma/dmagent do the installation. In the second listed scenario, we still want to install an example mailer.conf so just install the base sendmail(8) version. Reviewed by: bapt MFC after: 1 week Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24924		2020-06-02 02:38:54 +00:00
..
mailwrapper.8	Sync with NetBSD/OpenBSD.	2020-04-16 03:23:19 +00:00
mailwrapper.c	Revert r326844	2018-01-02 16:50:57 +00:00
Makefile	pkgbase: resolve mailer.conf conflict WITHOUT_SENDMAIL	2020-06-02 02:38:54 +00:00
Makefile.depend	Revert r326844	2018-01-02 16:50:57 +00:00
pathnames.h	various: general adoption of SPDX licensing ID tags.	2017-11-27 15:37:16 +00:00