mirror of
https://github.com/opnsense/src.git
synced 2026-07-08 08:41:29 -04:00
This has most of the non-essential stuff removed (ie: what is not built) bmake glue to follow.
1339 lines
51 KiB
Text
1339 lines
51 KiB
Text
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains,comp.answers,news.answers
|
|
Path: vixie!news1.digital.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!usc!rutgers!njitgw.njit.edu!hertz.njit.edu!cdp2582
|
|
From: cdp@njit.edu (Chris Peckham)
|
|
Subject: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) (Part 1 of 2)
|
|
Message-ID: <cptd-faq-1-810621452@njit.edu>
|
|
Followup-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
|
|
Originator: cdp2582@hertz.njit.edu
|
|
Keywords: BIND,DOMAIN,DNS
|
|
Sender: news@njit.edu
|
|
Supersedes: <cptd-faq-1-807632375@njit.edu>
|
|
Nntp-Posting-Host: hertz.njit.edu
|
|
X-Posting-Frequency: posted on the 1st of each month
|
|
Reply-To: domain-faq@njit.edu (comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains FAQ comments)
|
|
Organization: NJIT.EDU - New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
|
|
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 1995 04:37:47 GMT
|
|
Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU
|
|
Expires: Sat 14 Oct 95 00:37:32 EDT
|
|
Lines: 1319
|
|
Xref: vixie comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains:6018 comp.answers:13881 news.answers:49918
|
|
|
|
Posted-By: auto-faq 3.1.1.2
|
|
Archive-name: internet/tcp-ip/domains-faq/part1
|
|
Revision: 1.6 1995/05/12 18:49:48
|
|
|
|
|
|
This FAQ is edited and maintained by Chris Peckham, <cdp@njit.edu>.
|
|
The latest version may always be found for anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/news.answers/internet/tcp-ip/domains-faq
|
|
ftp://ftp.njit.edu/pub/dns/Comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains.FAQ
|
|
|
|
If you can contribute any answers for items in the TODO section, please do
|
|
so by sending e-mail to domain-faq@njit.edu ! If you know of any items that
|
|
are not included and you feel that they should be, send the relevant
|
|
information to domain-faq@njit.edu.
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri May 12 14:41:47 EDT 1995
|
|
Subject: Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
|
|
=================
|
|
Part 1
|
|
------
|
|
0. TO DO
|
|
1. INTRODUCTION / MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
1.1 What is this newsgroup ?
|
|
1.2 More information
|
|
1.3 What is BIND and where is the latest version of BIND ?
|
|
1.4 How can I find the route between systems ?
|
|
1.5 Finding the hostname if you have the tcp-ip address
|
|
1.6 How to register a domain name
|
|
1.7 Change of Domain name
|
|
1.8 How memory and CPU does DNS use ?
|
|
1.9 Other things to consider when planning your servers
|
|
1.10 Proper way to get NS and reverse IP records into DNS
|
|
1.11 How to get my address assign from NIC?
|
|
1.12 Is there a block of private IP addresses I can use?
|
|
1.13 Cache failed lookups
|
|
1.14 What does an NS record really do ?
|
|
1.15 DNS ports
|
|
1.16 Obtaining the latest cache file
|
|
2. UTILITIES
|
|
2.1 Utilities to administer DNS zone files
|
|
2.2 DIG - Domain Internet Groper
|
|
2.3 DNS packet analyzer
|
|
2.4 host
|
|
2.5 Programming with DNS
|
|
2.6 A source of information relating to DNS
|
|
3. DEFINITIONS
|
|
3.1 TCP/IP Host Naming Conventions
|
|
3.2 Slaves and servers with forwarders
|
|
3.3 When is a server authoritative?
|
|
3.4 Underscore in host-/domain names
|
|
3.5 Lame delegation
|
|
3.6 What does opt-class field do?
|
|
3.7 Top level domains
|
|
3.8 Classes of networks
|
|
3.9 What is CIDR ?
|
|
3.10 What is the rule for glue ?
|
|
|
|
Part 2
|
|
------
|
|
4. CONFIGURATION
|
|
4.1 Changing a Secondary server to a Primary
|
|
4.2 How do I subnet a Class B Address ?
|
|
4.3 Subnetted domain name service
|
|
4.4 Recommended format/style of DNS files
|
|
4.5 DNS on a system not connected to the Internet
|
|
4.6 Multiple Domain configuration
|
|
4.7 wildcard MX records
|
|
4.8 How to identify a wildcard MX record
|
|
4.9 Why are fully qualified domain names recommended ?
|
|
4.10 Distributing load using named
|
|
4.11 Order of returned records
|
|
4.12 resolv.conf
|
|
4.13 Delegating authority
|
|
4.14 DNS instead of NIS on a Sun OS 4.1.x system
|
|
5. PROBLEMS
|
|
5.1 No address for root server
|
|
5.2 Error - No Root Nameservers for Class XX
|
|
5.3 Bind 4.9.x and MX querying?
|
|
5.4 Some root nameservers don't know localhost
|
|
5.5 MX records and CNAMES and separate A records for MX targets
|
|
5.6 NS is a CNAME
|
|
5.7 Nameserver forgets own A record
|
|
5.8 General problems (core dumps !)
|
|
5.9 malloc and DECstations
|
|
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Wed May 3 12:55:13 EDT 1995
|
|
Subject: Q0 - TO DO list
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How to do an initial installation
|
|
* How to change service providers (what happens)
|
|
* Explain the difference between BIND (an implementation) and DNS (spec)
|
|
* Expand the slave/forward section of Q 3.2
|
|
* Add a definition of a "private domain" in discussion (or cut it out)
|
|
* mention mail-to-news gateways for newsgroup, mailing lists, anonymous
|
|
ftp, etc in what is newsgroup section
|
|
* The evils of wildcard MX records
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Thu Dec 1 11:08:28 EST 1994
|
|
Subject: Q1.1 - What is this newsgroup ?
|
|
|
|
comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains is the usenet newsgroup for discussion
|
|
on issues relating to the Domain Name System (DNS).
|
|
|
|
This newsgroup is not for issues directly relating to IP routing and
|
|
addressing. Issues of that nature should be directed towards
|
|
comp.protocols.tcp-ip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri May 12 13:54:01 EDT 1995
|
|
Subject: Q1.2 - More information
|
|
|
|
You can find more information concerning DNS in the following places:
|
|
|
|
* The BOG (BIND Operations Guide) - in the BIND distribution
|
|
* The FAQ included with bind4.9.3 doc/misc/FAQ
|
|
* DNS and BIND by Albitz and Liu (an O'Reilly & Associates Nutshell
|
|
handbook)
|
|
* A number of RFCs (920, 974, 1032, 1034, 1101, 1123, 1178, 1183, 1348,
|
|
1535, 1536, 1537, 1591, 1706, 1712, 1713)
|
|
* The DNS Resource Directory (DNSRD)
|
|
http://www.dns.net/dnsrd
|
|
* If you are having troubles relating to sendmail and DNS, you may wish to
|
|
refer to the USEnet newsgroup comp.mail.sendmail and/or the FAQ for that
|
|
newsgroup
|
|
ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/news.answers/mail/sendmail-faq
|
|
* Information concerning some frequently asked questions relating to
|
|
the Internet (i.e., what is the InterNIC, what is an RFC, what is the
|
|
IETF, etc) may be found for anonymous ftp from
|
|
ftp://ds.internic.net/fyi/fyi4.txt
|
|
A version may also be obtained with the URL
|
|
gopher://ds.internic.net/00/fyi/fyi4.txt
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri Aug 4 10:18:58 EDT 1995
|
|
Subject: Q1.3 - What is BIND and where is the latest version of BIND ?
|
|
|
|
Q: What is BIND ?
|
|
|
|
A: From the BOG Introduction -
|
|
|
|
The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) implements
|
|
an Internet name server for the BSD operating system.
|
|
The BIND consists of a server (or ``daemon'') and a
|
|
resolver library. A name server is a network service
|
|
that enables clients to name resources or objects and
|
|
share this information with other objects in the network.
|
|
This in effect is a distributed data base system for
|
|
objects in a computer network. BIND is fully integrated
|
|
into BSD (4.3 and later releases) network programs for
|
|
use in storing and retrieving host names and address.
|
|
The system administrator can configure the system to use
|
|
BIND as a replacement to the older host table lookup of
|
|
information in the network hosts file /etc/hosts. The
|
|
default configuration for BSD uses BIND.
|
|
|
|
Q: Where is the latest non-beta version of BIND ?
|
|
|
|
A: The latest non-beta version of BIND is version 4.9.2. This can be
|
|
found for anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/misc/vixie/4.9.2-940221.tar.gz
|
|
|
|
Q: Where is the latest version of 4.9.3 located ?
|
|
|
|
A: You can reference this URL:
|
|
|
|
http://www.isc.org/isc/
|
|
|
|
At this time, the latest version of 4.9.3 may be found for anonymous ftp
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
ftp://ftp.vix.com/pub/bind/testing/bind-4.9.3-BETA24.tar.gz
|
|
|
|
You will need GNU zip, Larry Wall's patch program (if there are any
|
|
patch files), and a C compiler to get BIND running from the above
|
|
mentioned source.
|
|
|
|
GNU zip is available for anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu/pub/gnu/gzip-1.2.4.tar
|
|
|
|
patch is available for anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu/pub/gnu/patch-2.1.tar.gz
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Mon Jan 2 13:27:27 EST 1995
|
|
Subject: Q1.4 - How can I find the route between systems
|
|
|
|
Q: How can I find the path taken by packets between two systems/domains ?
|
|
|
|
A: Get the source of the 'traceroute' command, compile it and install
|
|
it on your system.
|
|
|
|
One version of this program with additional functionality may be found
|
|
for anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://ftp.nikhef.nl/pub/network/traceroute.tar.Z
|
|
|
|
This package is mirrored at
|
|
|
|
ftp://ftp.njit.edu/pub/dns/nikhef/traceroute.tar.Z
|
|
|
|
Another version may be found for anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://ftp.psc.edu/pub/net_tools/traceroute.tar
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Thu Dec 1 09:55:24 EST 1994
|
|
Subject: Q1.5 - Finding the hostname if you have the tcp-ip address
|
|
|
|
Q: Can someone tell me how can I find the name of the domain if I know the
|
|
tcp-ip address of the domain? Is there some kind of service for this?
|
|
|
|
A: For an address a.b.c.d you can always do:
|
|
|
|
% nslookup
|
|
> set q=ptr
|
|
> d.c.b.a.in-addr.arpa.
|
|
|
|
Most newer version of nslookup (since 4.8.3) will recognize an address,
|
|
so you can just say:
|
|
|
|
% nslookup a.b.c.d
|
|
|
|
DiG will work like this also:
|
|
|
|
$ dig -x a.b.c.d
|
|
|
|
Host from the contrib/host from the bind distribution may also be used.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri Apr 28 13:16:32 EDT 1995
|
|
Subject: Q1.6 - How to register a domain name
|
|
|
|
Q: I would like to register a domain. How do I do this ? Can a name be
|
|
reserved, or must we already have an IP address and be hooked up to the
|
|
Internet before obtaining a domain name?
|
|
|
|
A: You can talk to your Internet Service Provider (ISP). They can submit
|
|
the registration for you. If you are not going to be directly
|
|
connected, they should be able to offer MX records for your domain
|
|
for mail delivery (so that mail sent to the new domain will be sent
|
|
to your "standard" account). In the case where the registration is
|
|
done by the organization itself, it still makes the whole process
|
|
much easier if the ISP is approached for secondary servers _before_
|
|
the InterNIC is approached for registration.
|
|
|
|
For information about making the registration yourself, look to the
|
|
InterNIC !
|
|
|
|
ftp://internic.net/templates/
|
|
gopher://rs.internic.net/
|
|
http://www.internic.net/infoguide.html
|
|
http://www.ripe.net
|
|
|
|
You will need at least two domain name servers when you register your
|
|
domain. Many ISP's are willing to provide primary and/or secondary name
|
|
service for their customers.
|
|
|
|
Many times, registration of a domain name can be initiated by sending
|
|
e-mail to the zone contact. You can obtain the contact in the
|
|
SOA record for the country, or in a whois server:
|
|
|
|
$ nslookup -type=SOA fr.
|
|
origin = ns1.nic.fr
|
|
mail addr = nic.nic.fr
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
The mail address to contact in this case is 'nic@nic.fr' (you must
|
|
substitute an '@' for the first dot in the mail addr field).
|
|
|
|
An alternate method to obtain the e-mail address of the national NIC
|
|
is the 'whois' server at InterNIC.
|
|
|
|
You may be requested to make your request to another email address or
|
|
using a certain information template/application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Sun Nov 27 23:32:41 EST 1994
|
|
Subject: Q1.7 - Change of Domain name
|
|
|
|
Q: We are preparing for a change of our domain name:
|
|
abc.foobar.com -> foobar.net
|
|
|
|
What are the tricks and caveats we should be aware of ?
|
|
|
|
A: The forward zones are easy and there are a number of ways to do it.
|
|
One way is the following:
|
|
|
|
Have a single db file for the 2 domains, and have a single machine
|
|
be the primary server for both abc.foobar.com and foobar.net.
|
|
|
|
To resolve the host foo in both domains, use a single zone file which
|
|
merely uses this for the host:
|
|
|
|
foo IN A 1.2.3.4
|
|
|
|
Use a "@" wherever the domain would be used ie for the SOA:
|
|
|
|
@ IN SOA (...
|
|
|
|
Then use this pair of lines in your named.boot:
|
|
|
|
primary abc.foobar.com db.foobar
|
|
primary foobar.net db.foobar
|
|
|
|
The reverse zones should either contain PTRs to both names,
|
|
or to whichever name you believe to be canonical currently.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri Apr 28 13:52:20 EDT 1995
|
|
Subject: Q1.8 - How memory and CPU does DNS use ?
|
|
|
|
Q: How much memory and CPU does DNS use ?
|
|
|
|
A: It can use quite a bit ! The main thing that BIND needs is memory.
|
|
It uses very little CPU or network bandwidth. The main
|
|
considerations to keep in mind when planning are:
|
|
|
|
1) How many zones do you have and how large are they ?
|
|
2) How many clients do you expect to serve and how active are they ?
|
|
|
|
As an example, here is a snapshot of memory usage from CSIRO Division
|
|
of Mathematics and Statistics, Australia
|
|
|
|
Named takes several days to stabalize its memory usage.
|
|
|
|
Our main server stabalises at ~10Mb. It takes about 3 days to
|
|
reach this size from 6 M at startup. This is under Sun OS 4.1.3U1.
|
|
|
|
As another example, here is the configuration of ns.uu.net (from late
|
|
1994):
|
|
|
|
ns.uu.net only does nameservice. It is running a version of BIND
|
|
4.9.3 on a Sun Classic with 96 MB of RAM, 220 MB of swap (remember
|
|
that Sun OS will reserve swap for each fork, even if it is not needed)
|
|
running Sun OS 4.1.3_U1.
|
|
|
|
Joseph Malcolm, of Alternet, states that named generally hovers at
|
|
5-10% of the CPU, except after a reload, when it eats it all. He
|
|
also states that if you are interested in the network connectivity
|
|
around the system (ns.uu.net is located off of Falls-Church4), a
|
|
PostScript map is available for anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://ftp.uu.net/uunet-info/alternet.map.ps
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Mon Jan 2 14:24:51 EST 1995
|
|
Subject: Q1.9 - Other things to consider when planning your servers
|
|
|
|
When making the plans to set up your servers, you may want to also
|
|
consider the following issues:
|
|
|
|
A) Server O/S limitations/capacities (which tend to be widely
|
|
divergent from vendor to vendor)
|
|
B) Client resolver behavior (even more widely divergent)
|
|
C) Expected query response time
|
|
D) Redundancy
|
|
E) Desired speed of change propagation
|
|
F) Network bandwidth availability
|
|
G) Number of zones/subdomain-levels desired
|
|
H) Richness of data stored (redundant MX records? HINFO records?)
|
|
I) Ease of administration desired
|
|
J) Network topology (impacts reverse-zone volume)
|
|
|
|
Assuming a best-possible case for the factors above, particularly (A), (B),
|
|
(C), (F), (G) & (H), it would be possible to run a 1000-node domain
|
|
using a single lowly 25 or 40 MHz 386 PC with a fairly modest amount of RAM
|
|
by today's standards, e.g. 4 or 8 Meg. However, this configuration would
|
|
be slow, unreliable, and would provide no functionality beyond your basic
|
|
address-to-name and name-to-address mappings.
|
|
|
|
Beyond that baseline case, depending on what factors listed above,
|
|
you may want look at other strategies, such splitting up the DNS
|
|
traffic among several machines strategically located, possibly larger ones,
|
|
and/or subdividing your domain itself. There are many options, tradeoffs,
|
|
and DNS architectural paradigms from which to choose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Mon Jan 2 13:03:53 EST 1995
|
|
Subject: Q1.10 - Proper way to get NS and reverse IP records into DNS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: Reverse domain registration is separate from forward domain registration.
|
|
How do I get it updated ?
|
|
|
|
A: Blocks of network addresses have been delegated by the InterNIC. Check
|
|
if your network a.b.c.0 is in such a block by using nslookup:
|
|
|
|
nslookup -type=soa c.b.a.in-addr.arpa.
|
|
nslookup -type=soa b.a.in-addr.arpa.
|
|
nslookup -type=soa a.in-addr.arpa.
|
|
|
|
One of the above should give you the information you are looking for
|
|
(the others will return with an error something like `*** No start of
|
|
authority (SOA) records available for ...')
|
|
This will give you the email address of the person to whom you should
|
|
address your change request.
|
|
|
|
If none of these works, your network probably has not been delegated
|
|
by the InterNIC and you need to contact them directly.
|
|
|
|
CIDR has meant that the registration is delegated, but registration
|
|
of in-addr.arpa has always been separate from forward zones - and
|
|
for good reason - in that the forward and reverse zones may have
|
|
different policies, contents etc, may be served by a different set
|
|
of nameservers, and exist at different times (usually only at point
|
|
of creation). There isn't a one-to-one mapping between the two, so
|
|
merging the registration would probably cause more problems than
|
|
people forgetting/not-knowing that they had to register in-addr.arpa
|
|
zones separately. For example, there are organizations that have
|
|
hundreds of networks and two or more domains, with a sprinkling of
|
|
machines from each network in each of the domains.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Mon Jan 2 13:08:38 EST 1995
|
|
Subject: Q1.11 - How to get my address assign from NIC ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: Can anyone tell me how can I get the address from NIC? How many subnets
|
|
will NIC give to me?
|
|
|
|
A: You should probably ask your Internet provider to give you an address.
|
|
These days, addresses are being distributed through the providers,
|
|
so that they can assign adjacent blocks of addresses to sites that
|
|
go through the same provider, to permit more efficient routing on
|
|
the backbones.
|
|
|
|
Unless you have thousands of hosts, you probably won't be able to get a
|
|
class B these days. Instead, you can get a series of class C networks.
|
|
Large requests will be queried, so be ready to provide a network plan if
|
|
you ask for more than 16 class C networks.
|
|
|
|
If you can't do this through your Internet provider, you can look for a
|
|
subnet registration form on rs.internic.net. See the answer in this FAQ
|
|
to the question "How to register a domain name" for a URL to these
|
|
forms.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Mon Jan 2 13:12:01 EST 1995
|
|
Subject: Q1.12 -Is there a block of private IP addresses I can use?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: Is there a block of private IP addresses I can use?
|
|
|
|
A: This answer may be found in the FAQ for the newsgroup comp.dcom.sys.cisco
|
|
available for anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/comp.dcom.sys.cisco
|
|
|
|
There is a block of private IP addresses that you can use. However
|
|
whether you wish to do so is an issue of some debate.
|
|
|
|
There are two RFCs which discuss this issue, and present opposing
|
|
views:
|
|
|
|
1597 Address Allocation for Private Internets. Y. Rekhter, B.
|
|
Moskowitz, D. Karrenberg & G. de Groot. March 1994. (Format:
|
|
TXT=17430 bytes)
|
|
|
|
1627 Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be
|
|
Codified). E. Lear, E. Fair, D. Crocker & T. Kessler. June 1994.
|
|
(Format: TXT=18823 bytes)
|
|
|
|
Neither one of these RFCs is anything more than a set of informational
|
|
guidelines; they are *not* words to live by (remember that RFC stands
|
|
for Request For Comments). If you're seriously considering using
|
|
private IP addresses, please read them both.
|
|
|
|
In any event, RFC 1597 documents the allocation of the following
|
|
addresses for use by ``private internets'':
|
|
|
|
10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
|
|
172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
|
|
192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255
|
|
|
|
Most importantly, it is vital that nothing using these addresses
|
|
should ever connect to the global Internet, or have plans to do so.
|
|
Please read the above RFCs before considering implementing such
|
|
a policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Mon Jan 2 13:55:50 EST 1995
|
|
Subject: Q1.13 - Cache failed lookups
|
|
|
|
Q: Does BIND cache negative answers (failed DNS lookups) ?
|
|
|
|
A: Yes, BIND 4.9.3 will cache negative answers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri Feb 10 15:35:07 EST 1995
|
|
Subject: Q1.14 - What does an NS record really do ?
|
|
|
|
Q: What does a NS record really do ?
|
|
|
|
A: The NS records in your zone data file pointing to the zone's name
|
|
servers (as opposed to the servers of delegated subdomains) don't do
|
|
much. They're essentially unused, though they are returned in the
|
|
authority section of reply packets from your name servers.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri Feb 10 15:40:10 EST 1995
|
|
Subject: Q1.15 - DNS ports
|
|
|
|
Q: Does anyone out there have any information/experience on exactly which
|
|
TCP/UDP ports DNS uses to send and receive queries ?
|
|
|
|
A: Use the following chart:
|
|
|
|
Prot Src Dst Use
|
|
udp 53 53 Queries between servers (eg, recursive queries)
|
|
Replies to above
|
|
tcp 53 53 Queries with long replies between servers, zone
|
|
transfers Replies to above
|
|
udp >1023 53 Client queries (sendmail, nslookup, etc ...)
|
|
udp 53 >1023 Replies to above
|
|
tcp >1023 53 Client queries with long replies
|
|
tcp 53 >1023 Replies to above
|
|
|
|
Note: >1023 is for non-priv ports on Un*x clients. On other client
|
|
types, the limit may be more or less.
|
|
|
|
Another point to keep in mind when designing filters for DNS is that a
|
|
DNS server uses port 53 both as the source and destination for it's
|
|
queries. So, a client queries an initial server from an unreserved
|
|
port number to UDP port 53. If the server needs to query another
|
|
server to get the required info, it sends a UDP query to that server
|
|
with both source and destination ports set to 53. The response is then
|
|
sent with the same src=53 dest=53 to the first server which then
|
|
responds to the original client from port 53 to the original source
|
|
port number.
|
|
|
|
The point of all this is that putting in filters to only allow UDP
|
|
between a high port and port 53 will not work correctly, you must also
|
|
allow the port 53 to port 53 UDP to get through.
|
|
|
|
Also, ALL versions of BIND use TCP for queries in some cases. The
|
|
original query is tried using UDP. If the response is longer than
|
|
the allocated buffer, the resolver will retry the query using a TCP
|
|
connection. If you block access to TCP port 53 as suggested above,
|
|
you may find that some things don't work.
|
|
|
|
Newer version of BIND allow you to configure a list of IP addresses
|
|
from which to allow zone transfers. This mechanism can be used to
|
|
prevent people from outside downloading your entire namespace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri Apr 28 14:19:10 EDT 1995
|
|
Subject: Q1.16 - Obtaining the latest cache file
|
|
|
|
Q: What is the cache file and where can I obtain the latest version ?
|
|
|
|
A: From the "Name Server Operations Guide"
|
|
|
|
6.3. Cache Initialization
|
|
|
|
6.3.1. root.cache
|
|
|
|
The name server needs to know the servers that
|
|
are the authoritative name servers for the root
|
|
domain of the network. To do this we have to prime
|
|
the name server's cache with the addresses of these
|
|
higher authorities. The location of this file is
|
|
specified in the boot file. ...
|
|
|
|
A copy of the comments in the file available from the InterNIC follow:
|
|
|
|
; This file holds the information on root name servers needed to
|
|
; initialize cache of Internet domain name servers
|
|
; (e.g. reference this file in the "cache . <file>"
|
|
; configuration file of BIND domain name servers).
|
|
;
|
|
; This file is made available by InterNIC registration services
|
|
; under anonymous FTP as
|
|
; file /domain/named.root
|
|
; on server FTP.RS.INTERNIC.NET
|
|
; -OR- under Gopher at RS.INTERNIC.NET
|
|
; under menu InterNIC Registration Services (NSI)
|
|
; submenu InterNIC Registration Archives
|
|
; file named.root
|
|
;
|
|
; last update: Oct 5, 1994
|
|
; related version of root zone: 1994100500
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
If you have a version of dig running, you may obtain the information with
|
|
the command
|
|
|
|
dig @ns.internic.net . ns
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Mon Jan 2 13:13:49 EST 1995
|
|
Subject: Q2.1 - Utilities to administer DNS zone files
|
|
|
|
Q: I am wondering if there are utilities available to ease the
|
|
administration of the zone files in the DNS.
|
|
|
|
A: There are a few. Two common ones are h2n and makezones. Both are perl
|
|
scripts. h2n is used to convert host tables into zone data files. It
|
|
is available for anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://ftp.uu.net/published/oreilly/nutshell/dnsbind/dns.tar.Z.
|
|
|
|
makezones works from a single file that looks like a forward zone file,
|
|
with some additional syntax for special cases. It is included in the
|
|
current BIND distribution. The newest version is always available for
|
|
anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://ftp.cus.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programs/DNS/makezones
|
|
|
|
This package is mirrored at
|
|
|
|
ftp://ftp.njit.edu/pub/dns/cus.cam.ac/makezones
|
|
|
|
More information may be found using the DNS Resource Directory
|
|
|
|
http://www.dns.net/dnsrd
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Thu Dec 1 11:09:11 EST 1994
|
|
Subject: Q2.2 - DIG - Domain Internet Groper
|
|
|
|
Q: Where can I find the latest version of DIG ?
|
|
|
|
A: The latest and greatest, official, accept-no-substitutes version of DiG
|
|
is the one that comes with BIND. Get the latest kit.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Mon May 15 12:57:42 EDT 1995
|
|
Subject: Q2.3 -DNS packet analyser
|
|
|
|
Q: I'm looking for a Ethernet packet analyser of public domain or standard
|
|
(like tcpdump, snoop, packetman) that is able to determine DNS data
|
|
field protocol
|
|
|
|
A: There is a free ethernet analyser called Ethload available for PC's
|
|
running DOS. The latest filename is ETHLD104.ZIP. It understands lots
|
|
of protocols including TCP/UDP. It'll look inside there and display
|
|
DNS/BOOTP/ICMP packets etc. (Ed. note: something nice for someone to
|
|
add to tcpdump ;^) ). Depending on the ethernet controller it's given
|
|
it'll perform slightly differently. It handles NDIS/Novell/Packet
|
|
drivers. It works best with Novell's promiscuous mode drivers.
|
|
A A SimTel mirror site should have the program available for anonymous
|
|
ftp. As an example,
|
|
|
|
ftp://oak.oakland.edu/SimTel/msdos/lan/ethld104.zip
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Sun Dec 4 21:15:38 EST 1994
|
|
Subject: Q2.4 - host
|
|
|
|
A section from the host man page:
|
|
|
|
host looks for information about Internet hosts and domain
|
|
names. It gets this information from a set of intercon-
|
|
nected servers that are spread across the world. The infor-
|
|
mation is stored in the form of "resource records" belonging
|
|
to hierarchically organized "zones".
|
|
|
|
By default, the program simply converts between host names
|
|
and Internet addresses. However, with the -t, -a and -v
|
|
options, it can be used to find all of the information about
|
|
domain names that is maintained by the domain nameserver
|
|
system. The information printed consists of various fields
|
|
of the associated resource records that were retrieved.
|
|
|
|
The arguments can be either host names (domain names) or
|
|
numeric Internet addresses.
|
|
|
|
'host' is compatible with both BIND 4.9 and BIND 4.8
|
|
|
|
'host' may be found in contrib/host in the BIND distribution. The latest
|
|
version always available for anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://ftp.nikhef.nl/pub/network/host.tar.Z
|
|
|
|
It may also be found for anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://ftp.uu.net/networking/ip/dns/host.tar.Z
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri Feb 10 15:25:11 EST 1995
|
|
Subject: Q2.5 - Programming with DNS
|
|
|
|
Q: How can I use DNS information in my program?
|
|
|
|
A: It depends on precisely what you want to do:
|
|
|
|
a) Consider whether you need to write a program at all. It may well
|
|
be easier to write a shell program (e.g. using awk or perl) to parse
|
|
the output of dig, host or nslookup.
|
|
|
|
b) If all you need is names and addresses, there will probably be
|
|
system routines 'gethostbyname' and 'gethostbyaddr' to provide this
|
|
information.
|
|
|
|
c) If you need more details, then there are system routines (res_query
|
|
and res_search) to assist with making and sending DNS queries.
|
|
However, these do not include a routine to parse the resulting answer
|
|
(although routines to assist in this task are provided). There is a
|
|
separate library available that will take a DNS response and unpick
|
|
it into its constituent parts, returning a C structure that can be
|
|
used by the program. The source for this library is available for
|
|
anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://hpux.csc.liv.ac.uk/hpux/Networking/Admin/resparse-*
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Wed May 3 12:46:50 EDT 1995
|
|
Subject: Q2.6 - A source of information relating to DNS
|
|
|
|
Q: Where can I find utilities and tools to help me manage my zone files ?
|
|
|
|
A: There are several tools available. Please refer to the "tools" section
|
|
of the DNS resources directory:
|
|
|
|
http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/tools.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri May 12 14:33:40 EDT 1995
|
|
Subject: Q3.1 - TCP/IP Host Naming Conventions
|
|
|
|
Q: Is a guide available relating to naming systems ?
|
|
|
|
A: One guide/resource is RFC 1178, "Choosing a Name for Your Computer",
|
|
which is available via anonymous FTP from
|
|
|
|
ftp://ftp.internic.netrfc/rfc1178.txt
|
|
|
|
RFCs (Request For Comments) are specifications and guidelines for how
|
|
many aspects of TCP/IP and the Internet (should) work. Most RFCs are
|
|
fairly technical documents, and some have semantics that are hotly
|
|
contested in the newsgroups. But a few, like RFC 1178, are actually
|
|
good to read for someone who's just starting along a TCP/IP path.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Thu Dec 1 10:32:43 EST 1994
|
|
Subject: Q3.2 - What are slaves and forwarders ?
|
|
|
|
Q: What are slaves and forwarders ?
|
|
|
|
A: "forwarders" is a list of NS records that are _prepended_ to a list
|
|
of NS records to query if the data is not available locally. This
|
|
allows a rich cache of records to be built up at a centralized
|
|
location. This is good for sites that have sporadic or very slow
|
|
connections to the Internet. (demand dial-up, for example) It's
|
|
also just a good idea for very large distributed sites to increase
|
|
the chance that you don't have to go off to the Internet to get an
|
|
IP address. (sometimes for addresses across the street!)
|
|
|
|
"slave" modifies this to say to replace the list of NS records
|
|
with the forwarders entry, instead of prepending to it. This is
|
|
for firewalled environments, where the nameserver can't directly
|
|
get out to the Internet at all.
|
|
|
|
"slave" is meaningless (and invalid, in late-model BINDs) without
|
|
"forwarders". "forwarders" is an entry in named.boot, and therefore
|
|
applies only to the nameserver (not to resolvers).
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Mon Jan 2 13:15:13 EST 1995
|
|
Subject: Q3.3 - When is a server authoritative?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: What criteria does a server use to determine if it is authoritative
|
|
for a domain?
|
|
|
|
A: In the case of BIND:
|
|
1) The server contains current data in files for the zone in
|
|
question (Data must be current for secondaries, as defined
|
|
in the SOA)
|
|
2) The server is told that it is authoritative for the zone, by
|
|
a 'primary' or 'secondary' keyword in /etc/named.boot.
|
|
3) The server does an error-free load of the zone.
|
|
|
|
Q: I have set up a DNS where there is an SOA record for
|
|
the domain, but the server still does not consider itself
|
|
authoritative. (I used nslookup and set server=the correct machine.)
|
|
It seems to me that something is not matching up somewhere. I suspect
|
|
that this is because the service provider has not given us control
|
|
over the IP numbers in our own domain, and so while the machine listed
|
|
has an A record for an address, there is no corresponding PTR record.
|
|
|
|
A: That's possible too, but is unrelated to the first question.
|
|
You need to be delegated a zone before outside people will start
|
|
talking to your server. However, a server can still be authoritative
|
|
for a zone even though it hasn't been delegated authority (it's just
|
|
that only the people who use that as their server will see the data).
|
|
|
|
A server may consider itself non-authoritative even though it's a
|
|
primary if there is a syntax error in the zone (see point 3 above).
|
|
|
|
Q: I always believe that it was the NS record that defined authoritative
|
|
servers.
|
|
|
|
A: Nope, delegation is a separate issue from authoritativeness.
|
|
You can still be authoritative, but not delegated. (you can also be
|
|
delegated, but not authoritative -- that's a "lame delegation")
|
|
|
|
Q: We have had problems in the past from servers that were
|
|
authoritative (primary or secondary) but no NS, so other thought they
|
|
were not. Some resolvers get very confused when they get non-
|
|
authoritative data from the primary server.
|
|
|
|
A: Yes, that's a lame delegation. That's not caused by what you said,
|
|
but rather by a server which is _not_ authoritative for a zone, yet
|
|
someone else (the parent) is saying that a server is authoritative
|
|
(via the NS records).
|
|
|
|
The set of NS records in the parent zone must be a subset of the
|
|
authoritative servers to avoid lame delegations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri Apr 28 13:26:37 EDT 1995
|
|
Subject: Q3.4 - underscore in host-/domainnames
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: I had a quick look on whether underscores are allowed in host- or
|
|
domainnames.
|
|
|
|
RFC 1033 allows them.
|
|
RFC 1035 doesn't.
|
|
RFC 1123 doesn't.
|
|
dnswalk complains about them.
|
|
|
|
Which RFC is the final authority these days?
|
|
|
|
A: Actually RFC 1035 deals with names of machines or names of
|
|
mail domains. i.e "_" is not permitted in a hostname or on the
|
|
RHS of the "@" in local@domain.
|
|
|
|
Underscore is permitted where ever the domain is NOT one of
|
|
these types of addresses.
|
|
|
|
In general the DNS mostly contains hostnames and mail domainnames.
|
|
This will change as new resource record types for authenticating DNS
|
|
queries start to appear.
|
|
|
|
The latest version of 'host' checks for illegal characters in A/MX
|
|
record names and the NS/MX target names.
|
|
|
|
After saying all of that, remember that RFC 1123 is a Required Internet
|
|
Standard (per RFC 1720), and RFC 1033 isn't. Even 1035 isn't a required
|
|
standard. Therefore, RFC 1123 wins, no contest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri Dec 2 15:03:56 EST 1994
|
|
Subject: Q3.5 - Lame delegation
|
|
|
|
Q: What is lame delegation ?
|
|
|
|
A: Two things are required for a lame delegation:
|
|
1) A nameserver X is delegated as authoritative for a zone.
|
|
2) Nameserver X is not performing nameservice for that zone.
|
|
|
|
Try to think of a lame delegation as a long-term condition, brought
|
|
about by a misconfiguration somewhere. Bryan Beecher's 1992 LISA
|
|
paper on lame delegations is good to read on this. The problem
|
|
really lies in misconfigured nameservers, not "lameness" brought
|
|
about by transient outages. The latter is common on the Internet
|
|
and hard to avoid, while the former is correctable.
|
|
|
|
In order to be performing nameservice for a zone, it must have
|
|
(presumed correct) data for that zone, and it must be answering
|
|
authoritatively to resolver queries for that zone. (The AA bit is
|
|
set in the flags section)
|
|
|
|
The "classic" lame delegation case is when nameserver X is delegated
|
|
as authoritative for domain Y, yet when you ask Y about X, it
|
|
returns non-authoritative data.
|
|
|
|
Here's an example that shows what happens most often (using dig,
|
|
dnswalk, and doc to find).
|
|
|
|
Let's say the domain bogus.com gets registered at the NIC and they
|
|
have listed 2 primary name servers, both from their *upstream*
|
|
provider:
|
|
|
|
bogus.com IN NS ns.bogus.com
|
|
bogus.com IN NS upstream.com
|
|
bogus.com IN NS upstream1.com
|
|
|
|
So the root servers have this info. But when the admins at
|
|
bogus.com actually set up their zone files they put something like:
|
|
|
|
bogus.com IN NS upstream.com
|
|
bogus.com IN NS upstream1.com
|
|
|
|
So your name server may have the nameserver info cached (which it
|
|
may have gotten from the root). The root says "go ask ns.bogus.com"
|
|
since they are authoritative
|
|
|
|
This is usually from stuff being registered at the NIC (either
|
|
nic.ddn.mil or rs.internic.net), and then updated later, but the
|
|
folks who make the updates later never let the folks at the NIC know
|
|
about it.
|
|
|
|
Q: How can I see if the server is "lame" ?
|
|
|
|
A: Go to the authoritative servers one level up, and ask them who
|
|
they think is authoritative, and then go ask each one of those
|
|
delegees if they think that they themselves are authoritative. If any
|
|
responds "no", then you know who the lame delegation is, and who is
|
|
delegating lamely to them. You can then send off a message to the
|
|
administrators of the level above.
|
|
|
|
The 'lamers' script from Byran Beecher really takes care of all this
|
|
for you. It parses the lame delegation notices from BIND's syslog
|
|
and summarizes them for you. It may be found in the contrib section
|
|
of the latest BIND distribution. The latest version is available
|
|
for anonymous ftp from
|
|
|
|
ftp://terminator.cc.umich.edu/dns/lame-delegations/
|
|
|
|
If you want to actively check for lame delegations, you can use 'doc'
|
|
and 'dnswalk'. You can check things manually with 'dig'.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Thu Dec 1 11:10:39 EST 1994
|
|
Subject: Q3.6 - What does opt-class field do?
|
|
|
|
Q: Just something I was wondering about: What does the opt-class
|
|
field in an name database do (the one that always says IN)?
|
|
What would happen if I put something else there instead?
|
|
|
|
A: This field is the address class. From the BOG -
|
|
|
|
...is the address class; currently, only one class
|
|
is supported: IN for internet addresses and other
|
|
internet information. Limited support is included for
|
|
the HS class, which is for MIT/Athena ``Hesiod''
|
|
information.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri Feb 10 14:49:54 EST 1995
|
|
Subject: Q3.7 - Top level domains
|
|
|
|
|
|
A section from RFC 1591:
|
|
|
|
2. The Top Level Structure of the Domain Names
|
|
|
|
In the Domain Name System (DNS) naming of computers there is a
|
|
hierarchy of names. The root of system is unnamed. There are a set
|
|
of what are called "top-level domain names" (TLDs). These are the
|
|
generic TLDs (EDU, COM, NET, ORG, GOV, MIL, and INT), and the two
|
|
letter country codes from ISO-3166. It is extremely unlikely that
|
|
any other TLDs will be created.
|
|
|
|
[ Ed note: the ISO-3166 country codes may be found for anonymous ftp from:
|
|
|
|
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/country-codes
|
|
ftp://ftp.ripe.net/iso3166-codes
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
Under each TLD may be created a hierarchy of names. Generally, under
|
|
the generic TLDs the structure is very flat. That is, many
|
|
organizations are registered directly under the TLD, and any further
|
|
structure is up to the individual organizations.
|
|
|
|
In the country TLDs, there is a wide variation in the structure, in
|
|
some countries the structure is very flat, in others there is
|
|
substantial structural organization. In some country domains the
|
|
second levels are generic categories (such as, AC, CO, GO, and RE),
|
|
in others they are based on political geography, and in still others,
|
|
organization names are listed directly under the country code. The
|
|
organization for the US country domain is described in RFC 1480.
|
|
|
|
Each of the generic TLDs was created for a general category of
|
|
organizations. The country code domains (for example, FR, NL, KR,
|
|
US) are each organized by an administrator for that country. These
|
|
administrators may further delegate the management of portions of the
|
|
naming tree. These administrators are performing a public service on
|
|
behalf of the Internet community. Descriptions of the generic
|
|
domains and the US country domain follow.
|
|
|
|
Of these generic domains, five are international in nature, and two
|
|
are restricted to use by entities in the United States.
|
|
|
|
World Wide Generic Domains:
|
|
|
|
COM - This domain is intended for commercial entities, that is
|
|
companies. This domain has grown very large and there is
|
|
concern about the administrative load and system performance if
|
|
the current growth pattern is continued. Consideration is
|
|
being taken to subdivide the COM domain and only allow future
|
|
commercial registrations in the subdomains.
|
|
|
|
EDU - This domain was originally intended for all educational
|
|
institutions. Many Universities, colleges, schools,
|
|
educational service organizations, and educational consortia
|
|
have registered here. More recently a decision has been taken
|
|
to limit further registrations to 4 year colleges and
|
|
universities. Schools and 2-year colleges will be registered
|
|
in the country domains (see US Domain, especially K12 and CC,
|
|
below).
|
|
|
|
NET - This domain is intended to hold only the computers of network
|
|
providers, that is the NIC and NOC computers, the
|
|
administrative computers, and the network node computers. The
|
|
customers of the network provider would have domain names of
|
|
their own (not in the NET TLD).
|
|
|
|
ORG - This domain is intended as the miscellaneous TLD for
|
|
organizations that didn't fit anywhere else. Some non-
|
|
government organizations may fit here.
|
|
|
|
INT - This domain is for organizations established by international
|
|
treaties, or international databases.
|
|
|
|
United States Only Generic Domains:
|
|
|
|
GOV - This domain was originally intended for any kind of government
|
|
office or agency. More recently a decision was taken to
|
|
register only agencies of the US Federal government in this
|
|
domain. State and local agencies are registered in the country
|
|
domains (see US Domain, below).
|
|
|
|
MIL - This domain is used by the US military.
|
|
|
|
Example country code Domain:
|
|
|
|
US - As an example of a country domain, the US domain provides for
|
|
the registration of all kinds of entities in the United States
|
|
on the basis of political geography, that is, a hierarchy of
|
|
<entity-name>.<locality>.<state-code>.US. For example,
|
|
"IBM.Armonk.NY.US". In addition, branches of the US domain are
|
|
provided within each state for schools (K12), community
|
|
colleges (CC), technical schools (TEC), state government
|
|
agencies (STATE), councils of governments (COG),libraries
|
|
(LIB), museums (MUS), and several other generic types of
|
|
entities (see RFC 1480 for details).
|
|
|
|
|
|
A section from RFC 1480:
|
|
|
|
2. NAMING STRUCTURE
|
|
|
|
The US Domain hierarchy is based on political geography. The
|
|
basic name space under US is the state name space, then the
|
|
"locality" name space, (like a city, or county) then
|
|
organization or computer name and so on.
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
BERKELEY.CA.US
|
|
PORTLAND.WA.US
|
|
|
|
There is of course no problem with running out of names.
|
|
|
|
The things that are named are individual computers.
|
|
|
|
If you register now in one city and then move, the database can
|
|
be updated with a new name in your new city, and a pointer can
|
|
be set up from your old name to your new name. This type of
|
|
pointer is called a CNAME record.
|
|
|
|
The use of unregistered names is not effective and causes problems
|
|
for other users. Inventing your own name and using it without
|
|
registering is not a good idea.
|
|
|
|
In addition to strictly geographically names, some special names
|
|
are used, such as FED, STATE, AGENCY, DISTRICT, K12, LIB, CC,
|
|
CITY, and COUNTY. Several new name spaces have been created,
|
|
DNI, GEN, and TEC, and a minor change under the "locality" name
|
|
space was made to the existing CITY and COUNTY subdomains by
|
|
abbreviating them to CI and CO. A detailed description
|
|
follows.
|
|
|
|
Below US, Parallel to States:
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
"FED" - This branch may be used for agencies of the federal
|
|
government. For example: <org-name>.<city>.FED.US
|
|
|
|
"DNI" - DISTRIBUTED NATIONAL INSTITUTES - The "DNI" branch was
|
|
created directly under the top-level US. This branch is to be used
|
|
for distributed national institutes; organizations that span state,
|
|
regional, and other organizational boundaries; that are national in
|
|
scope, and have distributed facilities. For example:
|
|
<org-name>.DNI.US.
|
|
|
|
Name Space Within States:
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
"locality" - cities, counties, parishes, and townships. Subdomains
|
|
under the "locality" would be like CI.<city>.<state>.US,
|
|
CO.<county>.<state>.US, or businesses. For example:
|
|
Petville.Marvista.CA.US.
|
|
|
|
"CI" - This branch is used for city government agencies and is a
|
|
subdomain under the "locality" name (like Los Angeles). For example:
|
|
Fire-Dept.CI.Los-Angeles.CA.US.
|
|
|
|
"CO" - This branch is used for county government agencies and is a
|
|
subdomain under the "locality" name (like Los Angeles). For example:
|
|
Fire-Dept.CO.San-Diego.CA.US.
|
|
|
|
"K12" - This branch may be used for public school districts. A
|
|
special name "PVT" can be used in the place of a school district name
|
|
for private schools. For example: <school-name>.K12.<state>.US and
|
|
<school-name>.PVT.K12.<state>.US.
|
|
|
|
"CC" - COMMUNITY COLLEGES - This branch was established for all state
|
|
wide community colleges. For example: <school-name>.CC.<state>.US.
|
|
|
|
"TEC" - TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS - The branch "TEC" was
|
|
established for technical and vocational schools and colleges. For
|
|
example: <school-name>.TEC.<state>.US.
|
|
|
|
"LIB" - LIBRARIES (STATE, REGIONAL, CITY, COUNTY) - This branch may
|
|
be used for libraries only. For example: <lib-name>.LIB.<state>.US.
|
|
|
|
"STATE" - This branch may be used for state government agencies. For
|
|
example: <org-name>.STATE.<state>.US.
|
|
|
|
"GEN" - GENERAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY - This branch is for the things
|
|
that don't fit easily into any other structure listed -- things that
|
|
might fit in to something like ORG at the top-level. It is best not
|
|
to use the same keywords (ORG, EDU, COM, etc.) that are used at the
|
|
top-level to avoid confusion. GEN would be used for such things as,
|
|
state-wide organizations, clubs, or domain parks. For example:
|
|
<org-name>.GEN.<state-code>.US.
|
|
|
|
The application form for the US domain may be found for anonymous ftp
|
|
from:
|
|
|
|
ftp://internic.net/templates/us-domain-template.txt
|
|
|
|
The application form for the EDU, COM, NET, ORG, and GOV domains may be
|
|
found for anonymous ftp from:
|
|
|
|
ftp://internic.net/templates/domain-template.txt
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Date: Sun Nov 27 23:32:41 EST 1994
|
|
Subject: Q3.8 - Classes of networks
|
|
|
|
Q: I am just kind of curious to what exactly the differences in classes
|
|
of networks are (class A, B, C).
|
|
|
|
A: An Internet Protocol (IP) address is 32 bit in length, divided into
|
|
two or three parts (the network address, the subnet address (if present),
|
|
and the host address. The subnet addresses are only present if the
|
|
network has been divided into subnetworks. The length of the network,
|
|
subnet, and host field are all variable.
|
|
|
|
There are five different network classes. The leftmost bits indicate
|
|
the class of the network.
|
|
|
|
# bits in # bits in
|
|
network host
|
|
Class field field Internet Protocol address in binary Ranges
|
|
============================================================================
|
|
A 7 24 0NNNNNNN.HHHHHHHH.HHHHHHHH.HHHHHHHH 1-127.x.x.x
|
|
B 14 16 10NNNNNN.NNNNNNNN.HHHHHHHH.HHHHHHHH 128-191.x.x.x
|
|
C 22 8 110NNNNN.NNNNNNNN.NNNNNNNN.HHHHHHHH 192-223.x.x.x
|
|
D NOTE 1 1110xxxx.xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx 224-239.x.x.x
|
|
E NOTE 2 11110xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx 240-247.x.x.x
|
|
|
|
where N represents part of the network address and H represents part of
|
|
the host address. When the subnet address is defined, the needed bits
|
|
are assigned from the host address space.
|
|
|
|
NOTE 1: Reserved for multicast groups - RFC 1112
|
|
NOTE 2: Reserved for future use
|
|
|
|
127.0.0.1 is reserved for local loopback.
|
|
|
|
Under the current arrangements, many class A IP numbers will not be
|
|
assigned whereas class C usage will be at a premium.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri Apr 28 13:31:24 EDT 1995
|
|
Subject: Q3.9 - What is CIDR ?
|
|
|
|
Q: What is CIDR ?
|
|
|
|
A: CIDR is "Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR). From RFC1517:
|
|
|
|
...Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) attempts to deal with
|
|
these problems by defining a mechanism to slow the growth of
|
|
routing tables and reduce the need to allocate new IP network
|
|
numbers.
|
|
|
|
Much more information may be obtained in RFCs 1467, 1517, 1518, 1520;
|
|
with primary reference 1519
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri Apr 28 13:31:24 EDT 1995
|
|
Subject: Q3.10 - What is the rule for glue ?
|
|
|
|
Q: What is the rule for glue ?
|
|
|
|
A: A glue record is an A record for a name that appears on the right-hand
|
|
side of a NS record. So, if you have this:
|
|
|
|
sub.foobar.com. IN NS dns.sub.foobar.com.
|
|
dns.sub.foobar.com. IN A 1.2.3.4
|
|
|
|
then the second record is a glue record (for the NS record above it).
|
|
|
|
You need glue records when -- and only when -- you are delegating
|
|
authority to a nameserver that "lives" in the domain you are delegating
|
|
*and* you aren't a secondary server for that domain.
|
|
|
|
In other words, in the example above, you need to add an A record
|
|
for dns.sub.foobar.com since it "lives" in the domain it serves.
|
|
This boot strapping information is necessary: How are you supposed
|
|
to find out the IP address of the nameserver for domain FOO if the
|
|
nameserver for FOO "lives" in FOO?
|
|
|
|
If you have this NS record:
|
|
|
|
sub.foobar.com. IN NS dns.xyz123.com.
|
|
|
|
you do NOT need a glue record, and, in fact, adding one is a very
|
|
bad idea. If you add one, and then the folks at xyz123.com change
|
|
the address, then you will be passing out incorrect data.
|
|
|
|
Also, unless you actually have a machine called something.IN-ADDR.ARPA,
|
|
you will never have any glue records present in any of your "reverse"
|
|
files.
|
|
|
|
There is also a sort of implicit glue record that can be useful (or
|
|
confusing :^) ). If the parent server (abc.foobar.com domain in example
|
|
above) is a secondary server for the child, then the A record will be
|
|
fetched from the child server when the zone transfer is done. The glue
|
|
is still there but it's a little different, it's in the ip address in
|
|
the named.boot line instead of explicitly in the data. In this case
|
|
you can leave out the explicit glue A record and leave the manually
|
|
configured "glue" in just the one place in the named.boot file.
|
|
|
|
RFC 1537 says it quite nicely:
|
|
|
|
2. Glue records
|
|
|
|
Quite often, people put unnecessary glue (A) records in their
|
|
zone files. Even worse is that I've even seen *wrong* glue records
|
|
for an external host in a primary zone file! Glue records need only
|
|
be in a zone file if the server host is within the zone and there
|
|
is no A record for that host elsewhere in the zone file.
|
|
|
|
Old BIND versions ("native" 4.8.3 and older versions) showed the
|
|
problem that wrong glue records could enter secondary servers in
|
|
a zone transfer.
|