upstream/postgresql
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2026-02-13 07:43:11 -05:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
postgresql/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

1001 lines
28 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
* Routines to support bitmapped scans of relations
*
* NOTE: it is critical that this plan type only be used with MVCC-compliant
Use an MVCC snapshot, rather than SnapshotNow, for catalog scans. SnapshotNow scans have the undesirable property that, in the face of concurrent updates, the scan can fail to see either the old or the new versions of the row. In many cases, we work around this by requiring DDL operations to hold AccessExclusiveLock on the object being modified; in some cases, the existing locking is inadequate and random failures occur as a result. This commit doesn't change anything related to locking, but will hopefully pave the way to allowing lock strength reductions in the future. The major issue has held us back from making this change in the past is that taking an MVCC snapshot is significantly more expensive than using a static special snapshot such as SnapshotNow. However, testing of various worst-case scenarios reveals that this problem is not severe except under fairly extreme workloads. To mitigate those problems, we avoid retaking the MVCC snapshot for each new scan; instead, we take a new snapshot only when invalidation messages have been processed. The catcache machinery already requires that invalidation messages be sent before releasing the related heavyweight lock; else other backends might rely on locally-cached data rather than scanning the catalog at all. Thus, making snapshot reuse dependent on the same guarantees shouldn't break anything that wasn't already subtly broken. Patch by me. Review by Michael Paquier and Andres Freund.
2013-07-02 09:47:01 -04:00
* snapshots (ie, regular snapshots, not SnapshotAny or one of the other
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
* special snapshots). The reason is that since index and heap scans are
* decoupled, there can be no assurance that the index tuple prompting a
* visit to a particular heap TID still exists when the visit is made.
* Therefore the tuple might not exist anymore either (which is OK because
* heap_fetch will cope) --- but worse, the tuple slot could have been
* re-used for a newer tuple. With an MVCC snapshot the newer tuple is
Use an MVCC snapshot, rather than SnapshotNow, for catalog scans. SnapshotNow scans have the undesirable property that, in the face of concurrent updates, the scan can fail to see either the old or the new versions of the row. In many cases, we work around this by requiring DDL operations to hold AccessExclusiveLock on the object being modified; in some cases, the existing locking is inadequate and random failures occur as a result. This commit doesn't change anything related to locking, but will hopefully pave the way to allowing lock strength reductions in the future. The major issue has held us back from making this change in the past is that taking an MVCC snapshot is significantly more expensive than using a static special snapshot such as SnapshotNow. However, testing of various worst-case scenarios reveals that this problem is not severe except under fairly extreme workloads. To mitigate those problems, we avoid retaking the MVCC snapshot for each new scan; instead, we take a new snapshot only when invalidation messages have been processed. The catcache machinery already requires that invalidation messages be sent before releasing the related heavyweight lock; else other backends might rely on locally-cached data rather than scanning the catalog at all. Thus, making snapshot reuse dependent on the same guarantees shouldn't break anything that wasn't already subtly broken. Patch by me. Review by Michael Paquier and Andres Freund.
2013-07-02 09:47:01 -04:00
* certain to fail the time qual and so it will not be mistakenly returned,
* but with anything else we might return a tuple that doesn't meet the
* required index qual conditions.
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
*
*
Update copyright for 2024 Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 12
2024-01-03 20:49:05 -05:00
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2024, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
Remove cvs keywords from all files.
2010-09-20 16:08:53 -04:00
* src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
/*
* INTERFACE ROUTINES
* ExecBitmapHeapScan scans a relation using bitmap info
* ExecBitmapHeapNext workhorse for above
* ExecInitBitmapHeapScan creates and initializes state info.
Make NestLoop plan nodes pass outer-relation variables into their inner relation using the general PARAM_EXEC executor parameter mechanism, rather than the ad-hoc kluge of passing the outer tuple down through ExecReScan. The previous method was hard to understand and could never be extended to handle parameters coming from multiple join levels. This patch doesn't change the set of possible plans nor have any significant performance effect, but it's necessary infrastructure for future generalization of the concept of an inner indexscan plan. ExecReScan's second parameter is now unused, so it's removed.
2010-07-12 13:01:06 -04:00
* ExecReScanBitmapHeapScan prepares to rescan the plan.
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
* ExecEndBitmapHeapScan releases all storage.
*/
#include "postgres.h"
Consistently declare timestamp variables as TimestampTz. Twiddle the replication-related code so that its timestamp variables are declared TimestampTz, rather than the uninformative "int64" that was previously used for meant-to-be-always-integer timestamps. This resolves the int64-vs-TimestampTz declaration inconsistencies introduced by commit 7c030783a, though in the opposite direction to what was originally suggested. This required including datatype/timestamp.h in a couple more places than before. I decided it would be a good idea to slim down that header by not having it pull in <float.h> etc, as those headers are no longer at all relevant to its purpose. Unsurprisingly, a small number of .c files turn out to have been depending on those inclusions, so add them back in the .c files as needed. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26788.1487455319@sss.pgh.pa.us Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/27694.1487456324@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-02-23 15:57:08 -05:00
#include <math.h>
Improve our #include situation by moving pointer types away from the corresponding struct definitions. This allows other headers to avoid including certain highly-loaded headers such as rel.h and relscan.h, instead using just relcache.h, heapam.h or genam.h, which are more lightweight and thus cause less unnecessary dependencies.
2008-06-18 20:46:06 -04:00
#include "access/relscan.h"
tableam: Add and use scan APIs. Too allow table accesses to be not directly dependent on heap, several new abstractions are needed. Specifically: 1) Heap scans need to be generalized into table scans. Do this by introducing TableScanDesc, which will be the "base class" for individual AMs. This contains the AM independent fields from HeapScanDesc. The previous heap_{beginscan,rescan,endscan} et al. have been replaced with a table_ version. There's no direct replacement for heap_getnext(), as that returned a HeapTuple, which is undesirable for a other AMs. Instead there's table_scan_getnextslot(). But note that heap_getnext() lives on, it's still used widely to access catalog tables. This is achieved by new scan_begin, scan_end, scan_rescan, scan_getnextslot callbacks. 2) The portion of parallel scans that's shared between backends need to be able to do so without the user doing per-AM work. To achieve that new parallelscan_{estimate, initialize, reinitialize} callbacks are introduced, which operate on a new ParallelTableScanDesc, which again can be subclassed by AMs. As it is likely that several AMs are going to be block oriented, block oriented callbacks that can be shared between such AMs are provided and used by heap. table_block_parallelscan_{estimate, intiialize, reinitialize} as callbacks, and table_block_parallelscan_{nextpage, init} for use in AMs. These operate on a ParallelBlockTableScanDesc. 3) Index scans need to be able to access tables to return a tuple, and there needs to be state across individual accesses to the heap to store state like buffers. That's now handled by introducing a sort-of-scan IndexFetchTable, which again is intended to be subclassed by individual AMs (for heap IndexFetchHeap). The relevant callbacks for an AM are index_fetch_{end, begin, reset} to create the necessary state, and index_fetch_tuple to retrieve an indexed tuple. Note that index_fetch_tuple implementations need to be smarter than just blindly fetching the tuples for AMs that have optimizations similar to heap's HOT - the currently alive tuple in the update chain needs to be fetched if appropriate. Similar to table_scan_getnextslot(), it's undesirable to continue to return HeapTuples. Thus index_fetch_heap (might want to rename that later) now accepts a slot as an argument. Core code doesn't have a lot of call sites performing index scans without going through the systable_* API (in contrast to loads of heap_getnext calls and working directly with HeapTuples). Index scans now store the result of a search in IndexScanDesc->xs_heaptid, rather than xs_ctup->t_self. As the target is not generally a HeapTuple anymore that seems cleaner. To be able to sensible adapt code to use the above, two further callbacks have been introduced: a) slot_callbacks returns a TupleTableSlotOps* suitable for creating slots capable of holding a tuple of the AMs type. table_slot_callbacks() and table_slot_create() are based upon that, but have additional logic to deal with views, foreign tables, etc. While this change could have been done separately, nearly all the call sites that needed to be adapted for the rest of this commit also would have been needed to be adapted for table_slot_callbacks(), making separation not worthwhile. b) tuple_satisfies_snapshot checks whether the tuple in a slot is currently visible according to a snapshot. That's required as a few places now don't have a buffer + HeapTuple around, but a slot (which in heap's case internally has that information). Additionally a few infrastructure changes were needed: I) SysScanDesc, as used by systable_{beginscan, getnext} et al. now internally uses a slot to keep track of tuples. While systable_getnext() still returns HeapTuples, and will so for the foreseeable future, the index API (see 1) above) now only deals with slots. The remainder, and largest part, of this commit is then adjusting all scans in postgres to use the new APIs. Author: Andres Freund, Haribabu Kommi, Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de https://postgr.es/m/20160812231527.GA690404@alvherre.pgsql
2019-03-11 15:46:41 -04:00
#include "access/tableam.h"
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
#include "access/visibilitymap.h"
Remove unused #include's from backend .c files as determined by include-what-you-use (IWYU) While IWYU also suggests to *add* a bunch of #include's (which is its main purpose), this patch does not do that. In some cases, a more specific #include replaces another less specific one. Some manual adjustments of the automatic result: - IWYU currently doesn't know about includes that provide global variable declarations (like -Wmissing-variable-declarations), so those includes are being kept manually. - All includes for port(ability) headers are being kept for now, to play it safe. - No changes of catalog/pg_foo.h to catalog/pg_foo_d.h, to keep the patch from exploding in size. Note that this patch touches just *.c files, so nothing declared in header files changes in hidden ways. As a small example, in src/backend/access/transam/rmgr.c, some IWYU pragma annotations are added to handle a special case there. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/af837490-6b2f-46df-ba05-37ea6a6653fc%40eisentraut.org
2024-03-04 06:00:11 -05:00
#include "executor/executor.h"
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
#include "executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.h"
Move interrupt checking from ExecProcNode() to executor nodes. In a followup commit ExecProcNode(), and especially the large switch it contains, will largely be replaced by a function pointer directly to the correct node. The node functions will then get invoked by a thin inline function wrapper. To avoid having to include miscadmin.h in headers - CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() - move the interrupt checks into the individual executor routines. While looking through all executor nodes, I noticed a number of arguably missing interrupt checks, add these too. Author: Andres Freund, Tom Lane Reviewed-By: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22833.1490390175@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-07-25 20:37:17 -04:00
#include "miscadmin.h"
Revise pgstats stuff to fix the problems with not counting accesses generated by bitmap index scans. Along the way, simplify and speed up the code for counting sequential and index scans; it was both confusing and inefficient to be taking care of that in the per-tuple loops, IMHO. initdb forced because of internal changes in pg_stat view definitions.
2005-10-05 22:29:23 -04:00
#include "pgstat.h"
Restructure some header files a bit, in particular heapam.h, by removing some unnecessary #include lines in it. Also, move some tuple routine prototypes and macros to htup.h, which allows removal of heapam.h inclusion from some .c files. For this to work, a new header file access/sysattr.h needed to be created, initially containing attribute numbers of system columns, for pg_dump usage. While at it, make contrib ltree, intarray and hstore header files more consistent with our header style.
2008-05-11 20:00:54 -04:00
#include "storage/bufmgr.h"
Move Trigger and TriggerDesc structs out of rel.h into a new reltrigger.h This lets us stop including rel.h into execnodes.h, which is a widely used header.
2011-02-23 12:18:09 -05:00
#include "utils/rel.h"
Make the order of the header file includes consistent in backend modules. Similar to commits 7e735035f2 and dddf4cdc33, this commit makes the order of header file inclusion consistent for backend modules. In the passing, removed a couple of duplicate inclusions. Author: Vignesh C Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh and Amit Kapila Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2Sznv8RR6Ex-iJO6xAdsxgWhCoETkaYX=+9DW3q0QCfA@mail.gmail.com
2019-11-11 22:00:16 -05:00
#include "utils/spccache.h"
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
static TupleTableSlot *BitmapHeapNext(BitmapHeapScanState *node);
Remove superfluous newlines in function prototypes. These were introduced by pgindent due to fixe to broken indentation (c.f. 8255c7a5eeba8). Previously the mis-indentation of function prototypes was creatively used to reduce indentation in a few places. As that formatting only exists in master and REL_12_STABLE, it seems better to fix it in both, rather than having some odd indentation in v12 that somebody might copy for future patches or such. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190728013754.jwcbe5nfyt3533vx@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 12-
2019-07-31 03:05:21 -04:00
static inline void BitmapDoneInitializingSharedState(ParallelBitmapHeapState *pstate);
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
static inline void BitmapAdjustPrefetchIterator(BitmapHeapScanState *node);
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
static inline void BitmapAdjustPrefetchTarget(BitmapHeapScanState *node);
static inline void BitmapPrefetch(BitmapHeapScanState *node,
tableam: Add and use scan APIs. Too allow table accesses to be not directly dependent on heap, several new abstractions are needed. Specifically: 1) Heap scans need to be generalized into table scans. Do this by introducing TableScanDesc, which will be the "base class" for individual AMs. This contains the AM independent fields from HeapScanDesc. The previous heap_{beginscan,rescan,endscan} et al. have been replaced with a table_ version. There's no direct replacement for heap_getnext(), as that returned a HeapTuple, which is undesirable for a other AMs. Instead there's table_scan_getnextslot(). But note that heap_getnext() lives on, it's still used widely to access catalog tables. This is achieved by new scan_begin, scan_end, scan_rescan, scan_getnextslot callbacks. 2) The portion of parallel scans that's shared between backends need to be able to do so without the user doing per-AM work. To achieve that new parallelscan_{estimate, initialize, reinitialize} callbacks are introduced, which operate on a new ParallelTableScanDesc, which again can be subclassed by AMs. As it is likely that several AMs are going to be block oriented, block oriented callbacks that can be shared between such AMs are provided and used by heap. table_block_parallelscan_{estimate, intiialize, reinitialize} as callbacks, and table_block_parallelscan_{nextpage, init} for use in AMs. These operate on a ParallelBlockTableScanDesc. 3) Index scans need to be able to access tables to return a tuple, and there needs to be state across individual accesses to the heap to store state like buffers. That's now handled by introducing a sort-of-scan IndexFetchTable, which again is intended to be subclassed by individual AMs (for heap IndexFetchHeap). The relevant callbacks for an AM are index_fetch_{end, begin, reset} to create the necessary state, and index_fetch_tuple to retrieve an indexed tuple. Note that index_fetch_tuple implementations need to be smarter than just blindly fetching the tuples for AMs that have optimizations similar to heap's HOT - the currently alive tuple in the update chain needs to be fetched if appropriate. Similar to table_scan_getnextslot(), it's undesirable to continue to return HeapTuples. Thus index_fetch_heap (might want to rename that later) now accepts a slot as an argument. Core code doesn't have a lot of call sites performing index scans without going through the systable_* API (in contrast to loads of heap_getnext calls and working directly with HeapTuples). Index scans now store the result of a search in IndexScanDesc->xs_heaptid, rather than xs_ctup->t_self. As the target is not generally a HeapTuple anymore that seems cleaner. To be able to sensible adapt code to use the above, two further callbacks have been introduced: a) slot_callbacks returns a TupleTableSlotOps* suitable for creating slots capable of holding a tuple of the AMs type. table_slot_callbacks() and table_slot_create() are based upon that, but have additional logic to deal with views, foreign tables, etc. While this change could have been done separately, nearly all the call sites that needed to be adapted for the rest of this commit also would have been needed to be adapted for table_slot_callbacks(), making separation not worthwhile. b) tuple_satisfies_snapshot checks whether the tuple in a slot is currently visible according to a snapshot. That's required as a few places now don't have a buffer + HeapTuple around, but a slot (which in heap's case internally has that information). Additionally a few infrastructure changes were needed: I) SysScanDesc, as used by systable_{beginscan, getnext} et al. now internally uses a slot to keep track of tuples. While systable_getnext() still returns HeapTuples, and will so for the foreseeable future, the index API (see 1) above) now only deals with slots. The remainder, and largest part, of this commit is then adjusting all scans in postgres to use the new APIs. Author: Andres Freund, Haribabu Kommi, Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de https://postgr.es/m/20160812231527.GA690404@alvherre.pgsql
2019-03-11 15:46:41 -04:00
TableScanDesc scan);
Remove superfluous newlines in function prototypes. These were introduced by pgindent due to fixe to broken indentation (c.f. 8255c7a5eeba8). Previously the mis-indentation of function prototypes was creatively used to reduce indentation in a few places. As that formatting only exists in master and REL_12_STABLE, it seems better to fix it in both, rather than having some odd indentation in v12 that somebody might copy for future patches or such. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190728013754.jwcbe5nfyt3533vx@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 12-
2019-07-31 03:05:21 -04:00
static bool BitmapShouldInitializeSharedState(ParallelBitmapHeapState *pstate);
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* BitmapHeapNext
*
* Retrieve next tuple from the BitmapHeapScan node's currentRelation
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
static TupleTableSlot *
BitmapHeapNext(BitmapHeapScanState *node)
{
ExprContext *econtext;
tableam: Add and use scan APIs. Too allow table accesses to be not directly dependent on heap, several new abstractions are needed. Specifically: 1) Heap scans need to be generalized into table scans. Do this by introducing TableScanDesc, which will be the "base class" for individual AMs. This contains the AM independent fields from HeapScanDesc. The previous heap_{beginscan,rescan,endscan} et al. have been replaced with a table_ version. There's no direct replacement for heap_getnext(), as that returned a HeapTuple, which is undesirable for a other AMs. Instead there's table_scan_getnextslot(). But note that heap_getnext() lives on, it's still used widely to access catalog tables. This is achieved by new scan_begin, scan_end, scan_rescan, scan_getnextslot callbacks. 2) The portion of parallel scans that's shared between backends need to be able to do so without the user doing per-AM work. To achieve that new parallelscan_{estimate, initialize, reinitialize} callbacks are introduced, which operate on a new ParallelTableScanDesc, which again can be subclassed by AMs. As it is likely that several AMs are going to be block oriented, block oriented callbacks that can be shared between such AMs are provided and used by heap. table_block_parallelscan_{estimate, intiialize, reinitialize} as callbacks, and table_block_parallelscan_{nextpage, init} for use in AMs. These operate on a ParallelBlockTableScanDesc. 3) Index scans need to be able to access tables to return a tuple, and there needs to be state across individual accesses to the heap to store state like buffers. That's now handled by introducing a sort-of-scan IndexFetchTable, which again is intended to be subclassed by individual AMs (for heap IndexFetchHeap). The relevant callbacks for an AM are index_fetch_{end, begin, reset} to create the necessary state, and index_fetch_tuple to retrieve an indexed tuple. Note that index_fetch_tuple implementations need to be smarter than just blindly fetching the tuples for AMs that have optimizations similar to heap's HOT - the currently alive tuple in the update chain needs to be fetched if appropriate. Similar to table_scan_getnextslot(), it's undesirable to continue to return HeapTuples. Thus index_fetch_heap (might want to rename that later) now accepts a slot as an argument. Core code doesn't have a lot of call sites performing index scans without going through the systable_* API (in contrast to loads of heap_getnext calls and working directly with HeapTuples). Index scans now store the result of a search in IndexScanDesc->xs_heaptid, rather than xs_ctup->t_self. As the target is not generally a HeapTuple anymore that seems cleaner. To be able to sensible adapt code to use the above, two further callbacks have been introduced: a) slot_callbacks returns a TupleTableSlotOps* suitable for creating slots capable of holding a tuple of the AMs type. table_slot_callbacks() and table_slot_create() are based upon that, but have additional logic to deal with views, foreign tables, etc. While this change could have been done separately, nearly all the call sites that needed to be adapted for the rest of this commit also would have been needed to be adapted for table_slot_callbacks(), making separation not worthwhile. b) tuple_satisfies_snapshot checks whether the tuple in a slot is currently visible according to a snapshot. That's required as a few places now don't have a buffer + HeapTuple around, but a slot (which in heap's case internally has that information). Additionally a few infrastructure changes were needed: I) SysScanDesc, as used by systable_{beginscan, getnext} et al. now internally uses a slot to keep track of tuples. While systable_getnext() still returns HeapTuples, and will so for the foreseeable future, the index API (see 1) above) now only deals with slots. The remainder, and largest part, of this commit is then adjusting all scans in postgres to use the new APIs. Author: Andres Freund, Haribabu Kommi, Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de https://postgr.es/m/20160812231527.GA690404@alvherre.pgsql
2019-03-11 15:46:41 -04:00
TableScanDesc scan;
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
TIDBitmap *tbm;
TupleTableSlot *slot;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
ParallelBitmapHeapState *pstate = node->pstate;
dsa_area *dsa = node->ss.ps.state->es_query_dsa;
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
/*
* extract necessary information from index scan node
*/
econtext = node->ss.ps.ps_ExprContext;
slot = node->ss.ss_ScanTupleSlot;
Change seqscan logic so that we check visibility of all tuples on a page when we first read the page, rather than checking them one at a time. This allows us to take and release the buffer content lock just once per page, instead of once per tuple. Since it's a shared lock the contention penalty for holding the lock longer shouldn't be too bad. We can safely do this only when using an MVCC snapshot; else the assumption that visibility won't change over time is uncool. Therefore there are now two code paths depending on the snapshot type. I also made the same change in nodeBitmapHeapscan.c, where it can be done always because we only support MVCC snapshots for bitmap scans anyway. Also make some incidental cleanups in the APIs of these functions. Per a suggestion from Qingqing Zhou.
2005-11-25 22:03:07 -05:00
scan = node->ss.ss_currentScanDesc;
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
tbm = node->tbm;
/*
* If we haven't yet performed the underlying index scan, do it, and begin
Revise the TIDBitmap API to support multiple concurrent iterations over a bitmap. This is extracted from Greg Stark's posix_fadvise patch; it seems worth committing separately, since it's potentially useful independently of posix_fadvise.
2009-01-10 16:08:36 -05:00
* the iteration over the bitmap.
Implement prefetching via posix_fadvise() for bitmap index scans. A new GUC variable effective_io_concurrency controls how many concurrent block prefetch requests will be issued. (The best way to handle this for plain index scans is still under debate, so that part is not applied yet --- tgl) Greg Stark
2009-01-12 00:10:45 -05:00
*
* For prefetching, we use *two* iterators, one for the pages we are
* actually scanning and another that runs ahead of the first for
* prefetching. node->prefetch_pages tracks exactly how many pages ahead
* the prefetch iterator is. Also, node->prefetch_target tracks the
* desired prefetch distance, which starts small and increases up to the
Allow per-tablespace effective_io_concurrency Per discussion, nowadays it is possible to have tablespaces that have wildly different I/O characteristics from others. Setting different effective_io_concurrency parameters for those has been measured to improve performance. Author: Julien Rouhaud Reviewed by: Andres Freund
2015-09-08 11:51:42 -04:00
* node->prefetch_maximum. This is to avoid doing a lot of prefetching in
* a scan that stops after a few tuples because of a LIMIT.
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
*/
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
if (!node->initialized)
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
{
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
TBMIterator *tbmiterator = NULL;
TBMSharedIterator *shared_tbmiterator = NULL;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
if (!pstate)
{
tbm = (TIDBitmap *) MultiExecProcNode(outerPlanState(node));
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
if (!tbm || !IsA(tbm, TIDBitmap))
elog(ERROR, "unrecognized result from subplan");
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
node->tbm = tbm;
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
tbmiterator = tbm_begin_iterate(tbm);
Implement prefetching via posix_fadvise() for bitmap index scans. A new GUC variable effective_io_concurrency controls how many concurrent block prefetch requests will be issued. (The best way to handle this for plain index scans is still under debate, so that part is not applied yet --- tgl) Greg Stark
2009-01-12 00:10:45 -05:00
#ifdef USE_PREFETCH
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
if (node->prefetch_maximum > 0)
{
node->prefetch_iterator = tbm_begin_iterate(tbm);
node->prefetch_pages = 0;
node->prefetch_target = -1;
}
#endif /* USE_PREFETCH */
Implement prefetching via posix_fadvise() for bitmap index scans. A new GUC variable effective_io_concurrency controls how many concurrent block prefetch requests will be issued. (The best way to handle this for plain index scans is still under debate, so that part is not applied yet --- tgl) Greg Stark
2009-01-12 00:10:45 -05:00
}
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
else
{
/*
* The leader will immediately come out of the function, but
* others will be blocked until leader populates the TBM and wakes
* them up.
*/
if (BitmapShouldInitializeSharedState(pstate))
{
tbm = (TIDBitmap *) MultiExecProcNode(outerPlanState(node));
if (!tbm || !IsA(tbm, TIDBitmap))
elog(ERROR, "unrecognized result from subplan");
node->tbm = tbm;
/*
* Prepare to iterate over the TBM. This will return the
* dsa_pointer of the iterator state which will be used by
* multiple processes to iterate jointly.
*/
pstate->tbmiterator = tbm_prepare_shared_iterate(tbm);
#ifdef USE_PREFETCH
if (node->prefetch_maximum > 0)
{
pstate->prefetch_iterator =
tbm_prepare_shared_iterate(tbm);
/*
* We don't need the mutex here as we haven't yet woke up
* others.
*/
pstate->prefetch_pages = 0;
pstate->prefetch_target = -1;
}
#endif
/* We have initialized the shared state so wake up others. */
BitmapDoneInitializingSharedState(pstate);
}
/* Allocate a private iterator and attach the shared state to it */
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
shared_tbmiterator =
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
tbm_attach_shared_iterate(dsa, pstate->tbmiterator);
#ifdef USE_PREFETCH
if (node->prefetch_maximum > 0)
{
node->shared_prefetch_iterator =
tbm_attach_shared_iterate(dsa, pstate->prefetch_iterator);
}
Implement prefetching via posix_fadvise() for bitmap index scans. A new GUC variable effective_io_concurrency controls how many concurrent block prefetch requests will be issued. (The best way to handle this for plain index scans is still under debate, so that part is not applied yet --- tgl) Greg Stark
2009-01-12 00:10:45 -05:00
#endif /* USE_PREFETCH */
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
}
BitmapHeapScan: begin scan after bitmap creation Change the order so that the table scan is initialized only after initializing the index scan and building the bitmap. This is mostly a cosmetic change for now, but later commits will need to pass parameters to table_beginscan_bm() that are unavailable in ExecInitBitmapHeapScan(). Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-06 16:57:58 -04:00
/*
* If this is the first scan of the underlying table, create the table
* scan descriptor and begin the scan.
*/
if (!scan)
{
BitmapHeapScan: Push skip_fetch optimization into table AM Commit 7c70996ebf0949b142 introduced an optimization to allow bitmap scans to operate like index-only scans by not fetching a block from the heap if none of the underlying data is needed and the block is marked all visible in the visibility map. With the introduction of table AMs, a FIXME was added to this code indicating that the skip_fetch logic should be pushed into the table AM-specific code, as not all table AMs may use a visibility map in the same way. This commit resolves this FIXME for the current block. The layering violation is still present in BitmapHeapScans's prefetching code, which uses the visibility map to decide whether or not to prefetch a block. However, this can be addressed independently. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Tomas Vondra, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-06 18:24:12 -04:00
bool need_tuples = false;
/*
* We can potentially skip fetching heap pages if we do not need
* any columns of the table, either for checking non-indexable
* quals or for returning data. This test is a bit simplistic, as
* it checks the stronger condition that there's no qual or return
* tlist at all. But in most cases it's probably not worth working
* harder than that.
*/
need_tuples = (node->ss.ps.plan->qual != NIL ||
node->ss.ps.plan->targetlist != NIL);
BitmapHeapScan: begin scan after bitmap creation Change the order so that the table scan is initialized only after initializing the index scan and building the bitmap. This is mostly a cosmetic change for now, but later commits will need to pass parameters to table_beginscan_bm() that are unavailable in ExecInitBitmapHeapScan(). Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-06 16:57:58 -04:00
scan = table_beginscan_bm(node->ss.ss_currentRelation,
node->ss.ps.state->es_snapshot,
0,
BitmapHeapScan: Push skip_fetch optimization into table AM Commit 7c70996ebf0949b142 introduced an optimization to allow bitmap scans to operate like index-only scans by not fetching a block from the heap if none of the underlying data is needed and the block is marked all visible in the visibility map. With the introduction of table AMs, a FIXME was added to this code indicating that the skip_fetch logic should be pushed into the table AM-specific code, as not all table AMs may use a visibility map in the same way. This commit resolves this FIXME for the current block. The layering violation is still present in BitmapHeapScans's prefetching code, which uses the visibility map to decide whether or not to prefetch a block. However, this can be addressed independently. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Tomas Vondra, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-06 18:24:12 -04:00
NULL,
need_tuples);
BitmapHeapScan: begin scan after bitmap creation Change the order so that the table scan is initialized only after initializing the index scan and building the bitmap. This is mostly a cosmetic change for now, but later commits will need to pass parameters to table_beginscan_bm() that are unavailable in ExecInitBitmapHeapScan(). Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-06 16:57:58 -04:00
node->ss.ss_currentScanDesc = scan;
}
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
scan->st.bitmap.rs_iterator = tbmiterator;
scan->st.bitmap.rs_shared_iterator = shared_tbmiterator;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
node->initialized = true;
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
goto new_page;
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
}
for (;;)
{
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
while (table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple(scan, slot))
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
{
/*
tableam: bitmap table scan. This moves bitmap heap scan support to below an optional tableam callback. It's optional as the whole concept of bitmap heapscans is fairly block specific. This basically moves the work previously done in bitgetpage() into the new scan_bitmap_next_block callback, and the direct poking into the buffer done in BitmapHeapNext() into the new scan_bitmap_next_tuple() callback. The abstraction is currently somewhat leaky because nodeBitmapHeapscan.c's prefetching and visibilitymap based logic remains - it's likely that we'll later have to move more into the AM. But it's not trivial to do so without introducing a significant amount of code duplication between the AMs, so that's a project for later. Note that now nodeBitmapHeapscan.c and the associated node types are a bit misnamed. But it's not clear whether renaming wouldn't be a cure worse than the disease. Either way, that'd be best done in a separate commit. Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Robert Haas (in an older version) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de
2019-03-31 20:51:49 -04:00
* Continuing in previously obtained page.
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
*/
Implement prefetching via posix_fadvise() for bitmap index scans. A new GUC variable effective_io_concurrency controls how many concurrent block prefetch requests will be issued. (The best way to handle this for plain index scans is still under debate, so that part is not applied yet --- tgl) Greg Stark
2009-01-12 00:10:45 -05:00
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
Implement prefetching via posix_fadvise() for bitmap index scans. A new GUC variable effective_io_concurrency controls how many concurrent block prefetch requests will be issued. (The best way to handle this for plain index scans is still under debate, so that part is not applied yet --- tgl) Greg Stark
2009-01-12 00:10:45 -05:00
#ifdef USE_PREFETCH
8.4 pgindent run, with new combined Linux/FreeBSD/MinGW typedef list provided by Andrew.
2009-06-11 10:49:15 -04:00
Implement prefetching via posix_fadvise() for bitmap index scans. A new GUC variable effective_io_concurrency controls how many concurrent block prefetch requests will be issued. (The best way to handle this for plain index scans is still under debate, so that part is not applied yet --- tgl) Greg Stark
2009-01-12 00:10:45 -05:00
/*
* Try to prefetch at least a few pages even before we get to the
* second page if we don't stop reading after the first tuple.
*/
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
if (!pstate)
{
if (node->prefetch_target < node->prefetch_maximum)
node->prefetch_target++;
}
else if (pstate->prefetch_target < node->prefetch_maximum)
{
/* take spinlock while updating shared state */
SpinLockAcquire(&pstate->mutex);
if (pstate->prefetch_target < node->prefetch_maximum)
pstate->prefetch_target++;
SpinLockRelease(&pstate->mutex);
}
Implement prefetching via posix_fadvise() for bitmap index scans. A new GUC variable effective_io_concurrency controls how many concurrent block prefetch requests will be issued. (The best way to handle this for plain index scans is still under debate, so that part is not applied yet --- tgl) Greg Stark
2009-01-12 00:10:45 -05:00
#endif /* USE_PREFETCH */
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
/*
* We issue prefetch requests *after* fetching the current page to
* try to avoid having prefetching interfere with the main I/O.
* Also, this should happen only when we have determined there is
* still something to do on the current page, else we may
* uselessly prefetch the same page we are just about to request
* for real.
*/
BitmapPrefetch(node, scan);
/*
* If we are using lossy info, we have to recheck the qual
* conditions at every tuple.
*/
if (node->recheck)
{
econtext->ecxt_scantuple = slot;
if (!ExecQualAndReset(node->bitmapqualorig, econtext))
{
/* Fails recheck, so drop it and loop back for another */
InstrCountFiltered2(node, 1);
ExecClearTuple(slot);
continue;
}
}
/* OK to return this tuple */
return slot;
Implement prefetching via posix_fadvise() for bitmap index scans. A new GUC variable effective_io_concurrency controls how many concurrent block prefetch requests will be issued. (The best way to handle this for plain index scans is still under debate, so that part is not applied yet --- tgl) Greg Stark
2009-01-12 00:10:45 -05:00
}
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
new_page:
BitmapAdjustPrefetchIterator(node);
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
BitmapHeapScan: Push skip_fetch optimization into table AM Commit 7c70996ebf0949b142 introduced an optimization to allow bitmap scans to operate like index-only scans by not fetching a block from the heap if none of the underlying data is needed and the block is marked all visible in the visibility map. With the introduction of table AMs, a FIXME was added to this code indicating that the skip_fetch logic should be pushed into the table AM-specific code, as not all table AMs may use a visibility map in the same way. This commit resolves this FIXME for the current block. The layering violation is still present in BitmapHeapScans's prefetching code, which uses the visibility map to decide whether or not to prefetch a block. However, this can be addressed independently. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Tomas Vondra, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-06 18:24:12 -04:00
/*
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
* Returns false if the bitmap is exhausted and there are no further
* blocks we need to scan.
BitmapHeapScan: Push skip_fetch optimization into table AM Commit 7c70996ebf0949b142 introduced an optimization to allow bitmap scans to operate like index-only scans by not fetching a block from the heap if none of the underlying data is needed and the block is marked all visible in the visibility map. With the introduction of table AMs, a FIXME was added to this code indicating that the skip_fetch logic should be pushed into the table AM-specific code, as not all table AMs may use a visibility map in the same way. This commit resolves this FIXME for the current block. The layering violation is still present in BitmapHeapScans's prefetching code, which uses the visibility map to decide whether or not to prefetch a block. However, this can be addressed independently. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Tomas Vondra, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-06 18:24:12 -04:00
*/
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
if (!table_scan_bitmap_next_block(scan, &node->blockno,
&node->recheck,
&node->stats.lossy_pages,
&node->stats.exact_pages))
break;
BitmapHeapScan: Push skip_fetch optimization into table AM Commit 7c70996ebf0949b142 introduced an optimization to allow bitmap scans to operate like index-only scans by not fetching a block from the heap if none of the underlying data is needed and the block is marked all visible in the visibility map. With the introduction of table AMs, a FIXME was added to this code indicating that the skip_fetch logic should be pushed into the table AM-specific code, as not all table AMs may use a visibility map in the same way. This commit resolves this FIXME for the current block. The layering violation is still present in BitmapHeapScans's prefetching code, which uses the visibility map to decide whether or not to prefetch a block. However, this can be addressed independently. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Tomas Vondra, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-06 18:24:12 -04:00
/*
Remove duplicate words in comments A few comments contained duplicate "the" in sentences, fix by removing one occurrence. Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2aEEiPwGJmPdzBxROVvs8n75yCjKz4K1f1B2TdWpzxTA@mail.gmail.com
2024-10-31 06:38:03 -04:00
* If serial, we can error out if the prefetch block doesn't stay
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
* ahead of the current block.
BitmapHeapScan: Push skip_fetch optimization into table AM Commit 7c70996ebf0949b142 introduced an optimization to allow bitmap scans to operate like index-only scans by not fetching a block from the heap if none of the underlying data is needed and the block is marked all visible in the visibility map. With the introduction of table AMs, a FIXME was added to this code indicating that the skip_fetch logic should be pushed into the table AM-specific code, as not all table AMs may use a visibility map in the same way. This commit resolves this FIXME for the current block. The layering violation is still present in BitmapHeapScans's prefetching code, which uses the visibility map to decide whether or not to prefetch a block. However, this can be addressed independently. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Tomas Vondra, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-06 18:24:12 -04:00
*/
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
if (node->pstate == NULL &&
node->prefetch_iterator &&
node->prefetch_blockno < node->blockno)
elog(ERROR,
"prefetch and main iterators are out of sync. pfblockno: %d. blockno: %d",
node->prefetch_blockno, node->blockno);
/* Adjust the prefetch target */
BitmapAdjustPrefetchTarget(node);
Change seqscan logic so that we check visibility of all tuples on a page when we first read the page, rather than checking them one at a time. This allows us to take and release the buffer content lock just once per page, instead of once per tuple. Since it's a shared lock the contention penalty for holding the lock longer shouldn't be too bad. We can safely do this only when using an MVCC snapshot; else the assumption that visibility won't change over time is uncool. Therefore there are now two code paths depending on the snapshot type. I also made the same change in nodeBitmapHeapscan.c, where it can be done always because we only support MVCC snapshots for bitmap scans anyway. Also make some incidental cleanups in the APIs of these functions. Per a suggestion from Qingqing Zhou.
2005-11-25 22:03:07 -05:00
}
/*
* if we get here it means we are at the end of the scan..
*/
return ExecClearTuple(slot);
}
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
/*
* BitmapDoneInitializingSharedState - Shared state is initialized
*
* By this time the leader has already populated the TBM and initialized the
* shared state so wake up other processes.
*/
static inline void
BitmapDoneInitializingSharedState(ParallelBitmapHeapState *pstate)
{
SpinLockAcquire(&pstate->mutex);
pstate->state = BM_FINISHED;
SpinLockRelease(&pstate->mutex);
ConditionVariableBroadcast(&pstate->cv);
}
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
/*
* BitmapAdjustPrefetchIterator - Adjust the prefetch iterator
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
*
* We keep track of how far the prefetch iterator is ahead of the main
* iterator in prefetch_pages. For each block the main iterator returns, we
* decrement prefetch_pages.
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
*/
static inline void
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
BitmapAdjustPrefetchIterator(BitmapHeapScanState *node)
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
{
#ifdef USE_PREFETCH
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
ParallelBitmapHeapState *pstate = node->pstate;
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
TBMIterateResult *tbmpre;
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
if (pstate == NULL)
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
{
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
TBMIterator *prefetch_iterator = node->prefetch_iterator;
if (node->prefetch_pages > 0)
{
/* The main iterator has closed the distance by one page */
node->prefetch_pages--;
}
else if (prefetch_iterator)
{
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
tbmpre = tbm_iterate(prefetch_iterator);
node->prefetch_blockno = tbmpre ? tbmpre->blockno :
InvalidBlockNumber;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
}
return;
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
}
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
/*
* XXX: There is a known issue with keeping the prefetch and current block
* iterators in sync for parallel bitmap table scans. This can lead to
* prefetching blocks that have already been read. See the discussion
* here:
* https://postgr.es/m/20240315211449.en2jcmdqxv5o6tlz%40alap3.anarazel.de
* Note that moving the call site of BitmapAdjustPrefetchIterator()
* exacerbates the effects of this bug.
*/
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
if (node->prefetch_maximum > 0)
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
{
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
TBMSharedIterator *prefetch_iterator = node->shared_prefetch_iterator;
SpinLockAcquire(&pstate->mutex);
if (pstate->prefetch_pages > 0)
{
Fix thinko in BitmapAdjustPrefetchIterator. Dilip Kumar Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uKAvRhWprb0i-U9zFOekgQRRwqjP1wvOBsKZb-UEKbug@mail.gmail.com
2017-04-04 09:03:41 -04:00
pstate->prefetch_pages--;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
SpinLockRelease(&pstate->mutex);
}
else
{
/* Release the mutex before iterating */
SpinLockRelease(&pstate->mutex);
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
/*
* In case of shared mode, we can not ensure that the current
* blockno of the main iterator and that of the prefetch iterator
* are same. It's possible that whatever blockno we are
* prefetching will be processed by another process. Therefore,
* we don't validate the blockno here as we do in non-parallel
* case.
*/
if (prefetch_iterator)
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
{
tbmpre = tbm_shared_iterate(prefetch_iterator);
node->prefetch_blockno = tbmpre ? tbmpre->blockno :
InvalidBlockNumber;
}
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
}
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
}
#endif /* USE_PREFETCH */
}
/*
* BitmapAdjustPrefetchTarget - Adjust the prefetch target
*
* Increase prefetch target if it's not yet at the max. Note that
* we will increase it to zero after fetching the very first
* page/tuple, then to one after the second tuple is fetched, then
* it doubles as later pages are fetched.
*/
static inline void
BitmapAdjustPrefetchTarget(BitmapHeapScanState *node)
{
#ifdef USE_PREFETCH
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
ParallelBitmapHeapState *pstate = node->pstate;
if (pstate == NULL)
{
if (node->prefetch_target >= node->prefetch_maximum)
/* don't increase any further */ ;
else if (node->prefetch_target >= node->prefetch_maximum / 2)
node->prefetch_target = node->prefetch_maximum;
else if (node->prefetch_target > 0)
node->prefetch_target *= 2;
else
node->prefetch_target++;
return;
}
/* Do an unlocked check first to save spinlock acquisitions. */
if (pstate->prefetch_target < node->prefetch_maximum)
{
SpinLockAcquire(&pstate->mutex);
if (pstate->prefetch_target >= node->prefetch_maximum)
/* don't increase any further */ ;
else if (pstate->prefetch_target >= node->prefetch_maximum / 2)
pstate->prefetch_target = node->prefetch_maximum;
else if (pstate->prefetch_target > 0)
pstate->prefetch_target *= 2;
else
pstate->prefetch_target++;
SpinLockRelease(&pstate->mutex);
}
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
#endif /* USE_PREFETCH */
}
/*
* BitmapPrefetch - Prefetch, if prefetch_pages are behind prefetch_target
*/
static inline void
tableam: Add and use scan APIs. Too allow table accesses to be not directly dependent on heap, several new abstractions are needed. Specifically: 1) Heap scans need to be generalized into table scans. Do this by introducing TableScanDesc, which will be the "base class" for individual AMs. This contains the AM independent fields from HeapScanDesc. The previous heap_{beginscan,rescan,endscan} et al. have been replaced with a table_ version. There's no direct replacement for heap_getnext(), as that returned a HeapTuple, which is undesirable for a other AMs. Instead there's table_scan_getnextslot(). But note that heap_getnext() lives on, it's still used widely to access catalog tables. This is achieved by new scan_begin, scan_end, scan_rescan, scan_getnextslot callbacks. 2) The portion of parallel scans that's shared between backends need to be able to do so without the user doing per-AM work. To achieve that new parallelscan_{estimate, initialize, reinitialize} callbacks are introduced, which operate on a new ParallelTableScanDesc, which again can be subclassed by AMs. As it is likely that several AMs are going to be block oriented, block oriented callbacks that can be shared between such AMs are provided and used by heap. table_block_parallelscan_{estimate, intiialize, reinitialize} as callbacks, and table_block_parallelscan_{nextpage, init} for use in AMs. These operate on a ParallelBlockTableScanDesc. 3) Index scans need to be able to access tables to return a tuple, and there needs to be state across individual accesses to the heap to store state like buffers. That's now handled by introducing a sort-of-scan IndexFetchTable, which again is intended to be subclassed by individual AMs (for heap IndexFetchHeap). The relevant callbacks for an AM are index_fetch_{end, begin, reset} to create the necessary state, and index_fetch_tuple to retrieve an indexed tuple. Note that index_fetch_tuple implementations need to be smarter than just blindly fetching the tuples for AMs that have optimizations similar to heap's HOT - the currently alive tuple in the update chain needs to be fetched if appropriate. Similar to table_scan_getnextslot(), it's undesirable to continue to return HeapTuples. Thus index_fetch_heap (might want to rename that later) now accepts a slot as an argument. Core code doesn't have a lot of call sites performing index scans without going through the systable_* API (in contrast to loads of heap_getnext calls and working directly with HeapTuples). Index scans now store the result of a search in IndexScanDesc->xs_heaptid, rather than xs_ctup->t_self. As the target is not generally a HeapTuple anymore that seems cleaner. To be able to sensible adapt code to use the above, two further callbacks have been introduced: a) slot_callbacks returns a TupleTableSlotOps* suitable for creating slots capable of holding a tuple of the AMs type. table_slot_callbacks() and table_slot_create() are based upon that, but have additional logic to deal with views, foreign tables, etc. While this change could have been done separately, nearly all the call sites that needed to be adapted for the rest of this commit also would have been needed to be adapted for table_slot_callbacks(), making separation not worthwhile. b) tuple_satisfies_snapshot checks whether the tuple in a slot is currently visible according to a snapshot. That's required as a few places now don't have a buffer + HeapTuple around, but a slot (which in heap's case internally has that information). Additionally a few infrastructure changes were needed: I) SysScanDesc, as used by systable_{beginscan, getnext} et al. now internally uses a slot to keep track of tuples. While systable_getnext() still returns HeapTuples, and will so for the foreseeable future, the index API (see 1) above) now only deals with slots. The remainder, and largest part, of this commit is then adjusting all scans in postgres to use the new APIs. Author: Andres Freund, Haribabu Kommi, Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de https://postgr.es/m/20160812231527.GA690404@alvherre.pgsql
2019-03-11 15:46:41 -04:00
BitmapPrefetch(BitmapHeapScanState *node, TableScanDesc scan)
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
{
#ifdef USE_PREFETCH
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
ParallelBitmapHeapState *pstate = node->pstate;
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
if (pstate == NULL)
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
{
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
TBMIterator *prefetch_iterator = node->prefetch_iterator;
if (prefetch_iterator)
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
{
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
while (node->prefetch_pages < node->prefetch_target)
{
TBMIterateResult *tbmpre = tbm_iterate(prefetch_iterator);
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
bool skip_fetch;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
if (tbmpre == NULL)
{
/* No more pages to prefetch */
tbm_end_iterate(prefetch_iterator);
node->prefetch_iterator = NULL;
break;
}
node->prefetch_pages++;
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
node->prefetch_blockno = tbmpre->blockno;
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
/*
* If we expect not to have to actually read this heap page,
* skip this prefetch call, but continue to run the prefetch
* logic normally. (Would it be better not to increment
* prefetch_pages?)
*/
BitmapHeapScan: Push skip_fetch optimization into table AM Commit 7c70996ebf0949b142 introduced an optimization to allow bitmap scans to operate like index-only scans by not fetching a block from the heap if none of the underlying data is needed and the block is marked all visible in the visibility map. With the introduction of table AMs, a FIXME was added to this code indicating that the skip_fetch logic should be pushed into the table AM-specific code, as not all table AMs may use a visibility map in the same way. This commit resolves this FIXME for the current block. The layering violation is still present in BitmapHeapScans's prefetching code, which uses the visibility map to decide whether or not to prefetch a block. However, this can be addressed independently. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Tomas Vondra, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-06 18:24:12 -04:00
skip_fetch = (!(scan->rs_flags & SO_NEED_TUPLES) &&
BitmapHeapScan: Use correct recheck flag for skip_fetch As of 7c70996ebf0949b142a9, BitmapPrefetch() used the recheck flag for the current block to determine whether or not it should skip prefetching the proposed prefetch block. As explained in the comment, this assumed the index AM will report the same recheck value for the future page as it did for the current page - but there's no guarantee. This only affects prefetching - if the recheck flag changes, we may prefetch blocks unecessarily and not prefetch blocks that will be needed. But we don't need to rely on that assumption - we know the recheck flag for the block we're considering prefetching, so we can use that. The impact is very limited in practice - the opclass would need to assign different recheck flags to different blocks, but none of the built-in opclasses seems to do that. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1939305.1712415547%40sss.pgh.pa.us
2024-04-06 18:51:00 -04:00
!tbmpre->recheck &&
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
VM_ALL_VISIBLE(node->ss.ss_currentRelation,
tbmpre->blockno,
&node->pvmbuffer));
if (!skip_fetch)
PrefetchBuffer(scan->rs_rd, MAIN_FORKNUM, tbmpre->blockno);
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
}
}
return;
}
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
if (pstate->prefetch_pages < pstate->prefetch_target)
{
TBMSharedIterator *prefetch_iterator = node->shared_prefetch_iterator;
if (prefetch_iterator)
{
while (1)
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
{
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
TBMIterateResult *tbmpre;
bool do_prefetch = false;
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
bool skip_fetch;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
/*
* Recheck under the mutex. If some other process has already
* done enough prefetching then we need not to do anything.
*/
SpinLockAcquire(&pstate->mutex);
if (pstate->prefetch_pages < pstate->prefetch_target)
{
pstate->prefetch_pages++;
do_prefetch = true;
}
SpinLockRelease(&pstate->mutex);
if (!do_prefetch)
return;
tbmpre = tbm_shared_iterate(prefetch_iterator);
if (tbmpre == NULL)
{
/* No more pages to prefetch */
tbm_end_shared_iterate(prefetch_iterator);
node->shared_prefetch_iterator = NULL;
break;
}
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
node->prefetch_blockno = tbmpre->blockno;
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
/* As above, skip prefetch if we expect not to need page */
BitmapHeapScan: Push skip_fetch optimization into table AM Commit 7c70996ebf0949b142 introduced an optimization to allow bitmap scans to operate like index-only scans by not fetching a block from the heap if none of the underlying data is needed and the block is marked all visible in the visibility map. With the introduction of table AMs, a FIXME was added to this code indicating that the skip_fetch logic should be pushed into the table AM-specific code, as not all table AMs may use a visibility map in the same way. This commit resolves this FIXME for the current block. The layering violation is still present in BitmapHeapScans's prefetching code, which uses the visibility map to decide whether or not to prefetch a block. However, this can be addressed independently. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Tomas Vondra, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-06 18:24:12 -04:00
skip_fetch = (!(scan->rs_flags & SO_NEED_TUPLES) &&
BitmapHeapScan: Use correct recheck flag for skip_fetch As of 7c70996ebf0949b142a9, BitmapPrefetch() used the recheck flag for the current block to determine whether or not it should skip prefetching the proposed prefetch block. As explained in the comment, this assumed the index AM will report the same recheck value for the future page as it did for the current page - but there's no guarantee. This only affects prefetching - if the recheck flag changes, we may prefetch blocks unecessarily and not prefetch blocks that will be needed. But we don't need to rely on that assumption - we know the recheck flag for the block we're considering prefetching, so we can use that. The impact is very limited in practice - the opclass would need to assign different recheck flags to different blocks, but none of the built-in opclasses seems to do that. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1939305.1712415547%40sss.pgh.pa.us
2024-04-06 18:51:00 -04:00
!tbmpre->recheck &&
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
VM_ALL_VISIBLE(node->ss.ss_currentRelation,
tbmpre->blockno,
&node->pvmbuffer));
if (!skip_fetch)
PrefetchBuffer(scan->rs_rd, MAIN_FORKNUM, tbmpre->blockno);
Refactor bitmap heap scan in preparation for parallel support. The final patch will be less messy if the prefetching support is a bit better isolated, so do that. Dilip Kumar, with some changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, and Thomas Munro.
2017-03-02 08:17:40 -05:00
}
}
}
#endif /* USE_PREFETCH */
}
Re-implement EvalPlanQual processing to improve its performance and eliminate a lot of strange behaviors that occurred in join cases. We now identify the "current" row for every joined relation in UPDATE, DELETE, and SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE queries. If an EvalPlanQual recheck is necessary, we jam the appropriate row into each scan node in the rechecking plan, forcing it to emit only that one row. The former behavior could rescan the whole of each joined relation for each recheck, which was terrible for performance, and what's much worse could result in duplicated output tuples. Also, the original implementation of EvalPlanQual could not re-use the recheck execution tree --- it had to go through a full executor init and shutdown for every row to be tested. To avoid this overhead, I've associated a special runtime Param with each LockRows or ModifyTable plan node, and arranged to make every scan node below such a node depend on that Param. Thus, by signaling a change in that Param, the EPQ machinery can just rescan the already-built test plan. This patch also adds a prohibition on set-returning functions in the targetlist of SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE. This is needed to avoid the duplicate-output-tuple problem. It seems fairly reasonable since the other restrictions on SELECT FOR UPDATE are meant to ensure that there is a unique correspondence between source tuples and result tuples, which an output SRF destroys as much as anything else does.
2009-10-25 22:26:45 -04:00
/*
* BitmapHeapRecheck -- access method routine to recheck a tuple in EvalPlanQual
*/
static bool
BitmapHeapRecheck(BitmapHeapScanState *node, TupleTableSlot *slot)
{
ExprContext *econtext;
/*
* extract necessary information from index scan node
*/
econtext = node->ss.ps.ps_ExprContext;
/* Does the tuple meet the original qual conditions? */
econtext->ecxt_scantuple = slot;
Introduce ExecQualAndReset() helper. It's a common task to evaluate a qual and reset the corresponding expression context. Currently that requires storing the result of the qual eval, resetting the context, and then reacting on the result. As that's awkward several places only reset the context next time through a node. That's not great, so introduce a helper that evaluates and resets. It's a bit ugly that it currently uses MemoryContextReset() instead of ResetExprContext(), but that seems easier than reordering all of executor.h. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180109222544.f7loxrunqh3xjl5f@alap3.anarazel.de
2018-01-29 15:16:53 -05:00
return ExecQualAndReset(node->bitmapqualorig, econtext);
Re-implement EvalPlanQual processing to improve its performance and eliminate a lot of strange behaviors that occurred in join cases. We now identify the "current" row for every joined relation in UPDATE, DELETE, and SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE queries. If an EvalPlanQual recheck is necessary, we jam the appropriate row into each scan node in the rechecking plan, forcing it to emit only that one row. The former behavior could rescan the whole of each joined relation for each recheck, which was terrible for performance, and what's much worse could result in duplicated output tuples. Also, the original implementation of EvalPlanQual could not re-use the recheck execution tree --- it had to go through a full executor init and shutdown for every row to be tested. To avoid this overhead, I've associated a special runtime Param with each LockRows or ModifyTable plan node, and arranged to make every scan node below such a node depend on that Param. Thus, by signaling a change in that Param, the EPQ machinery can just rescan the already-built test plan. This patch also adds a prohibition on set-returning functions in the targetlist of SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE. This is needed to avoid the duplicate-output-tuple problem. It seems fairly reasonable since the other restrictions on SELECT FOR UPDATE are meant to ensure that there is a unique correspondence between source tuples and result tuples, which an output SRF destroys as much as anything else does.
2009-10-25 22:26:45 -04:00
}
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ExecBitmapHeapScan(node)
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
Move ExecProcNode from dispatch to function pointer based model. This allows us to add stack-depth checks the first time an executor node is called, and skip that overhead on following calls. Additionally it yields a nice speedup. While it'd probably have been a good idea to have that check all along, it has become more important after the new expression evaluation framework in b8d7f053c5c2bf2a7e - there's no stack depth check in common paths anymore now. We previously relied on ExecEvalExpr() being executed somewhere. We should move towards that model for further routines, but as this is required for v10, it seems better to only do the necessary (which already is quite large). Author: Andres Freund, Tom Lane Reported-By: Julien Rouhaud Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22833.1490390175@sss.pgh.pa.us https://postgr.es/m/b0af9eaa-130c-60d0-9e4e-7a135b1e0c76@dalibo.com
2017-07-17 03:33:49 -04:00
static TupleTableSlot *
ExecBitmapHeapScan(PlanState *pstate)
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
{
Move ExecProcNode from dispatch to function pointer based model. This allows us to add stack-depth checks the first time an executor node is called, and skip that overhead on following calls. Additionally it yields a nice speedup. While it'd probably have been a good idea to have that check all along, it has become more important after the new expression evaluation framework in b8d7f053c5c2bf2a7e - there's no stack depth check in common paths anymore now. We previously relied on ExecEvalExpr() being executed somewhere. We should move towards that model for further routines, but as this is required for v10, it seems better to only do the necessary (which already is quite large). Author: Andres Freund, Tom Lane Reported-By: Julien Rouhaud Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22833.1490390175@sss.pgh.pa.us https://postgr.es/m/b0af9eaa-130c-60d0-9e4e-7a135b1e0c76@dalibo.com
2017-07-17 03:33:49 -04:00
BitmapHeapScanState *node = castNode(BitmapHeapScanState, pstate);
Re-implement EvalPlanQual processing to improve its performance and eliminate a lot of strange behaviors that occurred in join cases. We now identify the "current" row for every joined relation in UPDATE, DELETE, and SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE queries. If an EvalPlanQual recheck is necessary, we jam the appropriate row into each scan node in the rechecking plan, forcing it to emit only that one row. The former behavior could rescan the whole of each joined relation for each recheck, which was terrible for performance, and what's much worse could result in duplicated output tuples. Also, the original implementation of EvalPlanQual could not re-use the recheck execution tree --- it had to go through a full executor init and shutdown for every row to be tested. To avoid this overhead, I've associated a special runtime Param with each LockRows or ModifyTable plan node, and arranged to make every scan node below such a node depend on that Param. Thus, by signaling a change in that Param, the EPQ machinery can just rescan the already-built test plan. This patch also adds a prohibition on set-returning functions in the targetlist of SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE. This is needed to avoid the duplicate-output-tuple problem. It seems fairly reasonable since the other restrictions on SELECT FOR UPDATE are meant to ensure that there is a unique correspondence between source tuples and result tuples, which an output SRF destroys as much as anything else does.
2009-10-25 22:26:45 -04:00
return ExecScan(&node->ss,
(ExecScanAccessMtd) BitmapHeapNext,
(ExecScanRecheckMtd) BitmapHeapRecheck);
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
}
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
Make NestLoop plan nodes pass outer-relation variables into their inner relation using the general PARAM_EXEC executor parameter mechanism, rather than the ad-hoc kluge of passing the outer tuple down through ExecReScan. The previous method was hard to understand and could never be extended to handle parameters coming from multiple join levels. This patch doesn't change the set of possible plans nor have any significant performance effect, but it's necessary infrastructure for future generalization of the concept of an inner indexscan plan. ExecReScan's second parameter is now unused, so it's removed.
2010-07-12 13:01:06 -04:00
* ExecReScanBitmapHeapScan(node)
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
void
Make NestLoop plan nodes pass outer-relation variables into their inner relation using the general PARAM_EXEC executor parameter mechanism, rather than the ad-hoc kluge of passing the outer tuple down through ExecReScan. The previous method was hard to understand and could never be extended to handle parameters coming from multiple join levels. This patch doesn't change the set of possible plans nor have any significant performance effect, but it's necessary infrastructure for future generalization of the concept of an inner indexscan plan. ExecReScan's second parameter is now unused, so it's removed.
2010-07-12 13:01:06 -04:00
ExecReScanBitmapHeapScan(BitmapHeapScanState *node)
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
{
Use outerPlanState macro instead of referring to leffttree. This makes the executor code more consistent. It also removes an apparently superfluous NULL test in nodeGroup.c. Qingqing Zhou, reviewed by Tom Lane, and further revised by me.
2015-05-04 16:13:07 -04:00
PlanState *outerPlan = outerPlanState(node);
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
TableScanDesc scan = node->ss.ss_currentScanDesc;
if (scan)
{
/*
* End iteration on iterators saved in scan descriptor.
*/
if (scan->st.bitmap.rs_shared_iterator)
{
tbm_end_shared_iterate(scan->st.bitmap.rs_shared_iterator);
scan->st.bitmap.rs_shared_iterator = NULL;
}
if (scan->st.bitmap.rs_iterator)
{
tbm_end_iterate(scan->st.bitmap.rs_iterator);
scan->st.bitmap.rs_iterator = NULL;
}
/* rescan to release any page pin */
BitmapHeapScan: begin scan after bitmap creation Change the order so that the table scan is initialized only after initializing the index scan and building the bitmap. This is mostly a cosmetic change for now, but later commits will need to pass parameters to table_beginscan_bm() that are unavailable in ExecInitBitmapHeapScan(). Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-06 16:57:58 -04:00
table_rescan(node->ss.ss_currentScanDesc, NULL);
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
}
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
/* release bitmaps and buffers if any */
Implement prefetching via posix_fadvise() for bitmap index scans. A new GUC variable effective_io_concurrency controls how many concurrent block prefetch requests will be issued. (The best way to handle this for plain index scans is still under debate, so that part is not applied yet --- tgl) Greg Stark
2009-01-12 00:10:45 -05:00
if (node->prefetch_iterator)
tbm_end_iterate(node->prefetch_iterator);
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
if (node->shared_prefetch_iterator)
tbm_end_shared_iterate(node->shared_prefetch_iterator);
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
if (node->tbm)
tbm_free(node->tbm);
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
if (node->pvmbuffer != InvalidBuffer)
ReleaseBuffer(node->pvmbuffer);
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
node->tbm = NULL;
Implement prefetching via posix_fadvise() for bitmap index scans. A new GUC variable effective_io_concurrency controls how many concurrent block prefetch requests will be issued. (The best way to handle this for plain index scans is still under debate, so that part is not applied yet --- tgl) Greg Stark
2009-01-12 00:10:45 -05:00
node->prefetch_iterator = NULL;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
node->initialized = false;
node->shared_prefetch_iterator = NULL;
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
node->pvmbuffer = InvalidBuffer;
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
node->recheck = true;
node->blockno = InvalidBlockNumber;
node->prefetch_blockno = InvalidBlockNumber;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
Re-implement EvalPlanQual processing to improve its performance and eliminate a lot of strange behaviors that occurred in join cases. We now identify the "current" row for every joined relation in UPDATE, DELETE, and SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE queries. If an EvalPlanQual recheck is necessary, we jam the appropriate row into each scan node in the rechecking plan, forcing it to emit only that one row. The former behavior could rescan the whole of each joined relation for each recheck, which was terrible for performance, and what's much worse could result in duplicated output tuples. Also, the original implementation of EvalPlanQual could not re-use the recheck execution tree --- it had to go through a full executor init and shutdown for every row to be tested. To avoid this overhead, I've associated a special runtime Param with each LockRows or ModifyTable plan node, and arranged to make every scan node below such a node depend on that Param. Thus, by signaling a change in that Param, the EPQ machinery can just rescan the already-built test plan. This patch also adds a prohibition on set-returning functions in the targetlist of SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE. This is needed to avoid the duplicate-output-tuple problem. It seems fairly reasonable since the other restrictions on SELECT FOR UPDATE are meant to ensure that there is a unique correspondence between source tuples and result tuples, which an output SRF destroys as much as anything else does.
2009-10-25 22:26:45 -04:00
ExecScanReScan(&node->ss);
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
/*
Make NestLoop plan nodes pass outer-relation variables into their inner relation using the general PARAM_EXEC executor parameter mechanism, rather than the ad-hoc kluge of passing the outer tuple down through ExecReScan. The previous method was hard to understand and could never be extended to handle parameters coming from multiple join levels. This patch doesn't change the set of possible plans nor have any significant performance effect, but it's necessary infrastructure for future generalization of the concept of an inner indexscan plan. ExecReScan's second parameter is now unused, so it's removed.
2010-07-12 13:01:06 -04:00
* if chgParam of subnode is not null then plan will be re-scanned by
* first ExecProcNode.
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
*/
Use outerPlanState macro instead of referring to leffttree. This makes the executor code more consistent. It also removes an apparently superfluous NULL test in nodeGroup.c. Qingqing Zhou, reviewed by Tom Lane, and further revised by me.
2015-05-04 16:13:07 -04:00
if (outerPlan->chgParam == NULL)
ExecReScan(outerPlan);
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
}
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ExecEndBitmapHeapScan
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
void
ExecEndBitmapHeapScan(BitmapHeapScanState *node)
{
tableam: Add and use scan APIs. Too allow table accesses to be not directly dependent on heap, several new abstractions are needed. Specifically: 1) Heap scans need to be generalized into table scans. Do this by introducing TableScanDesc, which will be the "base class" for individual AMs. This contains the AM independent fields from HeapScanDesc. The previous heap_{beginscan,rescan,endscan} et al. have been replaced with a table_ version. There's no direct replacement for heap_getnext(), as that returned a HeapTuple, which is undesirable for a other AMs. Instead there's table_scan_getnextslot(). But note that heap_getnext() lives on, it's still used widely to access catalog tables. This is achieved by new scan_begin, scan_end, scan_rescan, scan_getnextslot callbacks. 2) The portion of parallel scans that's shared between backends need to be able to do so without the user doing per-AM work. To achieve that new parallelscan_{estimate, initialize, reinitialize} callbacks are introduced, which operate on a new ParallelTableScanDesc, which again can be subclassed by AMs. As it is likely that several AMs are going to be block oriented, block oriented callbacks that can be shared between such AMs are provided and used by heap. table_block_parallelscan_{estimate, intiialize, reinitialize} as callbacks, and table_block_parallelscan_{nextpage, init} for use in AMs. These operate on a ParallelBlockTableScanDesc. 3) Index scans need to be able to access tables to return a tuple, and there needs to be state across individual accesses to the heap to store state like buffers. That's now handled by introducing a sort-of-scan IndexFetchTable, which again is intended to be subclassed by individual AMs (for heap IndexFetchHeap). The relevant callbacks for an AM are index_fetch_{end, begin, reset} to create the necessary state, and index_fetch_tuple to retrieve an indexed tuple. Note that index_fetch_tuple implementations need to be smarter than just blindly fetching the tuples for AMs that have optimizations similar to heap's HOT - the currently alive tuple in the update chain needs to be fetched if appropriate. Similar to table_scan_getnextslot(), it's undesirable to continue to return HeapTuples. Thus index_fetch_heap (might want to rename that later) now accepts a slot as an argument. Core code doesn't have a lot of call sites performing index scans without going through the systable_* API (in contrast to loads of heap_getnext calls and working directly with HeapTuples). Index scans now store the result of a search in IndexScanDesc->xs_heaptid, rather than xs_ctup->t_self. As the target is not generally a HeapTuple anymore that seems cleaner. To be able to sensible adapt code to use the above, two further callbacks have been introduced: a) slot_callbacks returns a TupleTableSlotOps* suitable for creating slots capable of holding a tuple of the AMs type. table_slot_callbacks() and table_slot_create() are based upon that, but have additional logic to deal with views, foreign tables, etc. While this change could have been done separately, nearly all the call sites that needed to be adapted for the rest of this commit also would have been needed to be adapted for table_slot_callbacks(), making separation not worthwhile. b) tuple_satisfies_snapshot checks whether the tuple in a slot is currently visible according to a snapshot. That's required as a few places now don't have a buffer + HeapTuple around, but a slot (which in heap's case internally has that information). Additionally a few infrastructure changes were needed: I) SysScanDesc, as used by systable_{beginscan, getnext} et al. now internally uses a slot to keep track of tuples. While systable_getnext() still returns HeapTuples, and will so for the foreseeable future, the index API (see 1) above) now only deals with slots. The remainder, and largest part, of this commit is then adjusting all scans in postgres to use the new APIs. Author: Andres Freund, Haribabu Kommi, Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de https://postgr.es/m/20160812231527.GA690404@alvherre.pgsql
2019-03-11 15:46:41 -04:00
TableScanDesc scanDesc;
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
Show Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan worker stats in EXPLAIN ANALYZE Nodes like Memoize report the cache stats for each parallel worker, so it makes sense to show the exact and lossy pages in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan in a similar way. Likewise, Sort shows the method and memory used for each worker. There was some discussion on whether the leader stats should include the totals for each parallel worker or not. I did some analysis on this to see what other parallel node types do and it seems only Parallel Hash does anything like this. All the rest, per what's supported by ExecParallelRetrieveInstrumentation() are consistent with each other. Author: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Author: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Author: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Christofides <michael@pgmustard.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Ikeda <Masahiro.Ikeda@nttdata.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b3d80961-c2e5-38cc-6a32-61886cdf766d%40gmail.com
2024-07-08 20:15:47 -04:00
/*
* When ending a parallel worker, copy the statistics gathered by the
* worker back into shared memory so that it can be picked up by the main
* process to report in EXPLAIN ANALYZE.
*/
if (node->sinstrument != NULL && IsParallelWorker())
{
BitmapHeapScanInstrumentation *si;
Assert(ParallelWorkerNumber <= node->sinstrument->num_workers);
si = &node->sinstrument->sinstrument[ParallelWorkerNumber];
/*
* Here we accumulate the stats rather than performing memcpy on
* node->stats into si. When a Gather/GatherMerge node finishes it
* will perform planner shutdown on the workers. On rescan it will
* spin up new workers which will have a new BitmapHeapScanState and
* zeroed stats.
*/
si->exact_pages += node->stats.exact_pages;
si->lossy_pages += node->stats.lossy_pages;
}
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
/*
* extract information from the node
*/
scanDesc = node->ss.ss_currentScanDesc;
/*
* close down subplans
*/
ExecEndNode(outerPlanState(node));
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
if (scanDesc)
{
/*
* End iteration on iterators saved in scan descriptor.
*/
if (scanDesc->st.bitmap.rs_shared_iterator)
{
tbm_end_shared_iterate(scanDesc->st.bitmap.rs_shared_iterator);
scanDesc->st.bitmap.rs_shared_iterator = NULL;
}
if (scanDesc->st.bitmap.rs_iterator)
{
tbm_end_iterate(scanDesc->st.bitmap.rs_iterator);
scanDesc->st.bitmap.rs_iterator = NULL;
}
/*
* close table scan
*/
table_endscan(scanDesc);
}
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
/*
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
* release bitmaps and buffers if any
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
*/
Implement prefetching via posix_fadvise() for bitmap index scans. A new GUC variable effective_io_concurrency controls how many concurrent block prefetch requests will be issued. (The best way to handle this for plain index scans is still under debate, so that part is not applied yet --- tgl) Greg Stark
2009-01-12 00:10:45 -05:00
if (node->prefetch_iterator)
tbm_end_iterate(node->prefetch_iterator);
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
if (node->tbm)
tbm_free(node->tbm);
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
if (node->shared_prefetch_iterator)
tbm_end_shared_iterate(node->shared_prefetch_iterator);
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
if (node->pvmbuffer != InvalidBuffer)
ReleaseBuffer(node->pvmbuffer);
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
}
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ExecInitBitmapHeapScan
*
* Initializes the scan's state information.
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
BitmapHeapScanState *
Extend the ExecInitNode API so that plan nodes receive a set of flag bits indicating which optional capabilities can actually be exercised at runtime. This will allow Sort and Material nodes, and perhaps later other nodes, to avoid unnecessary overhead in common cases. This commit just adds the infrastructure and arranges to pass the correct flag values down to plan nodes; none of the actual optimizations are here yet. I'm committing this separately in case anyone wants to measure the added overhead. (It should be negligible.) Simon Riggs and Tom Lane
2006-02-27 23:10:28 -05:00
ExecInitBitmapHeapScan(BitmapHeapScan *node, EState *estate, int eflags)
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
{
BitmapHeapScanState *scanstate;
Relation currentRelation;
Extend the ExecInitNode API so that plan nodes receive a set of flag bits indicating which optional capabilities can actually be exercised at runtime. This will allow Sort and Material nodes, and perhaps later other nodes, to avoid unnecessary overhead in common cases. This commit just adds the infrastructure and arranges to pass the correct flag values down to plan nodes; none of the actual optimizations are here yet. I'm committing this separately in case anyone wants to measure the added overhead. (It should be negligible.) Simon Riggs and Tom Lane
2006-02-27 23:10:28 -05:00
/* check for unsupported flags */
Assert(!(eflags & (EXEC_FLAG_BACKWARD | EXEC_FLAG_MARK)));
Change seqscan logic so that we check visibility of all tuples on a page when we first read the page, rather than checking them one at a time. This allows us to take and release the buffer content lock just once per page, instead of once per tuple. Since it's a shared lock the contention penalty for holding the lock longer shouldn't be too bad. We can safely do this only when using an MVCC snapshot; else the assumption that visibility won't change over time is uncool. Therefore there are now two code paths depending on the snapshot type. I also made the same change in nodeBitmapHeapscan.c, where it can be done always because we only support MVCC snapshots for bitmap scans anyway. Also make some incidental cleanups in the APIs of these functions. Per a suggestion from Qingqing Zhou.
2005-11-25 22:03:07 -05:00
/*
* Assert caller didn't ask for an unsafe snapshot --- see comments at
* head of file.
*/
Assert(IsMVCCSnapshot(estate->es_snapshot));
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
/*
* create state structure
*/
scanstate = makeNode(BitmapHeapScanState);
scanstate->ss.ps.plan = (Plan *) node;
scanstate->ss.ps.state = estate;
Move ExecProcNode from dispatch to function pointer based model. This allows us to add stack-depth checks the first time an executor node is called, and skip that overhead on following calls. Additionally it yields a nice speedup. While it'd probably have been a good idea to have that check all along, it has become more important after the new expression evaluation framework in b8d7f053c5c2bf2a7e - there's no stack depth check in common paths anymore now. We previously relied on ExecEvalExpr() being executed somewhere. We should move towards that model for further routines, but as this is required for v10, it seems better to only do the necessary (which already is quite large). Author: Andres Freund, Tom Lane Reported-By: Julien Rouhaud Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22833.1490390175@sss.pgh.pa.us https://postgr.es/m/b0af9eaa-130c-60d0-9e4e-7a135b1e0c76@dalibo.com
2017-07-17 03:33:49 -04:00
scanstate->ss.ps.ExecProcNode = ExecBitmapHeapScan;
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
scanstate->tbm = NULL;
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
scanstate->pvmbuffer = InvalidBuffer;
Show Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan worker stats in EXPLAIN ANALYZE Nodes like Memoize report the cache stats for each parallel worker, so it makes sense to show the exact and lossy pages in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan in a similar way. Likewise, Sort shows the method and memory used for each worker. There was some discussion on whether the leader stats should include the totals for each parallel worker or not. I did some analysis on this to see what other parallel node types do and it seems only Parallel Hash does anything like this. All the rest, per what's supported by ExecParallelRetrieveInstrumentation() are consistent with each other. Author: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Author: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Author: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Christofides <michael@pgmustard.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Ikeda <Masahiro.Ikeda@nttdata.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b3d80961-c2e5-38cc-6a32-61886cdf766d%40gmail.com
2024-07-08 20:15:47 -04:00
/* Zero the statistics counters */
memset(&scanstate->stats, 0, sizeof(BitmapHeapScanInstrumentation));
Implement prefetching via posix_fadvise() for bitmap index scans. A new GUC variable effective_io_concurrency controls how many concurrent block prefetch requests will be issued. (The best way to handle this for plain index scans is still under debate, so that part is not applied yet --- tgl) Greg Stark
2009-01-12 00:10:45 -05:00
scanstate->prefetch_iterator = NULL;
scanstate->prefetch_pages = 0;
scanstate->prefetch_target = 0;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
scanstate->initialized = false;
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
scanstate->shared_prefetch_iterator = NULL;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
scanstate->pstate = NULL;
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the case when the bitmap was exhausted. It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false when there are no visible tuples on the page and table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table. As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter. Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code. This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once the read stream API is used. Author: Melanie Plageman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
2024-10-25 10:11:58 -04:00
scanstate->recheck = true;
scanstate->blockno = InvalidBlockNumber;
scanstate->prefetch_blockno = InvalidBlockNumber;
Allow bitmap scans to operate as index-only scans when possible. If we don't have to return any columns from heap tuples, and there's no need to recheck qual conditions, and the heap page is all-visible, then we can skip fetching the heap page altogether. Skip prefetching pages too, when possible, on the assumption that the recheck flag will remain the same from one page to the next. While that assumption is hardly bulletproof, it seems like a good bet most of the time, and better than prefetching pages we don't need. This commit installs the executor infrastructure, but doesn't change any planner cost estimates, thus possibly causing bitmap scans to not be chosen in cases where this change renders them the best choice. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that we need to account for this behavior in the planner, because I think typically the bitmap scan would get chosen anyway if it's the best bet. In any case the submitted patch took way too many shortcuts, resulting in too many clearly-bad choices, to be committable. Alexander Kuzmenkov, reviewed by Alexey Chernyshov, and whacked around rather heavily by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/239a8955-c0fc-f506-026d-c837e86c827b@postgrespro.ru
2017-11-01 17:38:12 -04:00
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
/*
* Miscellaneous initialization
*
* create expression context for node
*/
ExecAssignExprContext(estate, &scanstate->ss.ps);
/*
Restore sane locking behavior during parallel query. Commit 9a3cebeaa changed things so that parallel workers didn't obtain any lock of their own on tables they access. That was clearly a bad idea, but I'd mistakenly supposed that it was the intended end result of the series of patches for simplifying the executor's lock management. Undo that change in relation_open(), and adjust ExecOpenScanRelation() so that it gets the correct lock if inside a parallel worker. In passing, clean up some more obsolete comments about when locks are acquired. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e688@lab.ntt.co.jp
2018-10-06 15:49:37 -04:00
* open the scan relation
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
*/
Allow tupleslots to have a fixed tupledesc, use in executor nodes. The reason for doing so is that it will allow expression evaluation to optimize based on the underlying tupledesc. In particular it will allow to JIT tuple deforming together with the expression itself. For that expression initialization needs to be moved after the relevant slots are initialized - mostly unproblematic, except in the case of nodeWorktablescan.c. After doing so there's no need for ExecAssignResultType() and ExecAssignResultTypeFromTL() anymore, as all former callers have been converted to create a slot with a fixed descriptor. When creating a slot with a fixed descriptor, tts_values/isnull can be allocated together with the main slot, reducing allocation overhead and increasing cache density a bit. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171206093717.vqdxe5icqttpxs3p@alap3.anarazel.de
2018-02-17 00:17:38 -05:00
currentRelation = ExecOpenScanRelation(estate, node->scan.scanrelid, eflags);
/*
* initialize child nodes
*/
outerPlanState(scanstate) = ExecInitNode(outerPlan(node), estate, eflags);
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
/*
Allow tupleslots to have a fixed tupledesc, use in executor nodes. The reason for doing so is that it will allow expression evaluation to optimize based on the underlying tupledesc. In particular it will allow to JIT tuple deforming together with the expression itself. For that expression initialization needs to be moved after the relevant slots are initialized - mostly unproblematic, except in the case of nodeWorktablescan.c. After doing so there's no need for ExecAssignResultType() and ExecAssignResultTypeFromTL() anymore, as all former callers have been converted to create a slot with a fixed descriptor. When creating a slot with a fixed descriptor, tts_values/isnull can be allocated together with the main slot, reducing allocation overhead and increasing cache density a bit. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171206093717.vqdxe5icqttpxs3p@alap3.anarazel.de
2018-02-17 00:17:38 -05:00
* get the scan type from the relation descriptor.
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
*/
Allow tupleslots to have a fixed tupledesc, use in executor nodes. The reason for doing so is that it will allow expression evaluation to optimize based on the underlying tupledesc. In particular it will allow to JIT tuple deforming together with the expression itself. For that expression initialization needs to be moved after the relevant slots are initialized - mostly unproblematic, except in the case of nodeWorktablescan.c. After doing so there's no need for ExecAssignResultType() and ExecAssignResultTypeFromTL() anymore, as all former callers have been converted to create a slot with a fixed descriptor. When creating a slot with a fixed descriptor, tts_values/isnull can be allocated together with the main slot, reducing allocation overhead and increasing cache density a bit. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171206093717.vqdxe5icqttpxs3p@alap3.anarazel.de
2018-02-17 00:17:38 -05:00
ExecInitScanTupleSlot(estate, &scanstate->ss,
Introduce notion of different types of slots (without implementing them). Upcoming work intends to allow pluggable ways to introduce new ways of storing table data. Accessing those table access methods from the executor requires TupleTableSlots to be carry tuples in the native format of such storage methods; otherwise there'll be a significant conversion overhead. Different access methods will require different data to store tuples efficiently (just like virtual, minimal, heap already require fields in TupleTableSlot). To allow that without requiring additional pointer indirections, we want to have different structs (embedding TupleTableSlot) for different types of slots. Thus different types of slots are needed, which requires adapting creators of slots. The slot that most efficiently can represent a type of tuple in an executor node will often depend on the type of slot a child node uses. Therefore we need to track the type of slot is returned by nodes, so parent slots can create slots based on that. Relatedly, JIT compilation of tuple deforming needs to know which type of slot a certain expression refers to, so it can create an appropriate deforming function for the type of tuple in the slot. But not all nodes will only return one type of slot, e.g. an append node will potentially return different types of slots for each of its subplans. Therefore add function that allows to query the type of a node's result slot, and whether it'll always be the same type (whether it's fixed). This can be queried using ExecGetResultSlotOps(). The scan, result, inner, outer type of slots are automatically inferred from ExecInitScanTupleSlot(), ExecInitResultSlot(), left/right subtrees respectively. If that's not correct for a node, that can be overwritten using new fields in PlanState. This commit does not introduce the actually abstracted implementation of different kind of TupleTableSlots, that will be left for a followup commit. The different types of slots introduced will, for now, still use the same backing implementation. While this already partially invalidates the big comment in tuptable.h, it seems to make more sense to update it later, when the different TupleTableSlot implementations actually exist. Author: Ashutosh Bapat and Andres Freund, with changes by Amit Khandekar Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
2018-11-16 01:00:30 -05:00
RelationGetDescr(currentRelation),
tableam: Add and use scan APIs. Too allow table accesses to be not directly dependent on heap, several new abstractions are needed. Specifically: 1) Heap scans need to be generalized into table scans. Do this by introducing TableScanDesc, which will be the "base class" for individual AMs. This contains the AM independent fields from HeapScanDesc. The previous heap_{beginscan,rescan,endscan} et al. have been replaced with a table_ version. There's no direct replacement for heap_getnext(), as that returned a HeapTuple, which is undesirable for a other AMs. Instead there's table_scan_getnextslot(). But note that heap_getnext() lives on, it's still used widely to access catalog tables. This is achieved by new scan_begin, scan_end, scan_rescan, scan_getnextslot callbacks. 2) The portion of parallel scans that's shared between backends need to be able to do so without the user doing per-AM work. To achieve that new parallelscan_{estimate, initialize, reinitialize} callbacks are introduced, which operate on a new ParallelTableScanDesc, which again can be subclassed by AMs. As it is likely that several AMs are going to be block oriented, block oriented callbacks that can be shared between such AMs are provided and used by heap. table_block_parallelscan_{estimate, intiialize, reinitialize} as callbacks, and table_block_parallelscan_{nextpage, init} for use in AMs. These operate on a ParallelBlockTableScanDesc. 3) Index scans need to be able to access tables to return a tuple, and there needs to be state across individual accesses to the heap to store state like buffers. That's now handled by introducing a sort-of-scan IndexFetchTable, which again is intended to be subclassed by individual AMs (for heap IndexFetchHeap). The relevant callbacks for an AM are index_fetch_{end, begin, reset} to create the necessary state, and index_fetch_tuple to retrieve an indexed tuple. Note that index_fetch_tuple implementations need to be smarter than just blindly fetching the tuples for AMs that have optimizations similar to heap's HOT - the currently alive tuple in the update chain needs to be fetched if appropriate. Similar to table_scan_getnextslot(), it's undesirable to continue to return HeapTuples. Thus index_fetch_heap (might want to rename that later) now accepts a slot as an argument. Core code doesn't have a lot of call sites performing index scans without going through the systable_* API (in contrast to loads of heap_getnext calls and working directly with HeapTuples). Index scans now store the result of a search in IndexScanDesc->xs_heaptid, rather than xs_ctup->t_self. As the target is not generally a HeapTuple anymore that seems cleaner. To be able to sensible adapt code to use the above, two further callbacks have been introduced: a) slot_callbacks returns a TupleTableSlotOps* suitable for creating slots capable of holding a tuple of the AMs type. table_slot_callbacks() and table_slot_create() are based upon that, but have additional logic to deal with views, foreign tables, etc. While this change could have been done separately, nearly all the call sites that needed to be adapted for the rest of this commit also would have been needed to be adapted for table_slot_callbacks(), making separation not worthwhile. b) tuple_satisfies_snapshot checks whether the tuple in a slot is currently visible according to a snapshot. That's required as a few places now don't have a buffer + HeapTuple around, but a slot (which in heap's case internally has that information). Additionally a few infrastructure changes were needed: I) SysScanDesc, as used by systable_{beginscan, getnext} et al. now internally uses a slot to keep track of tuples. While systable_getnext() still returns HeapTuples, and will so for the foreseeable future, the index API (see 1) above) now only deals with slots. The remainder, and largest part, of this commit is then adjusting all scans in postgres to use the new APIs. Author: Andres Freund, Haribabu Kommi, Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de https://postgr.es/m/20160812231527.GA690404@alvherre.pgsql
2019-03-11 15:46:41 -04:00
table_slot_callbacks(currentRelation));
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
/*
Don't require return slots for nodes without projection. In a lot of nodes the return slot is not required. That can either be because the node doesn't do any projection (say an Append node), or because the node does perform projections but the projection is optimized away because the projection would yield an identical row. Slots aren't that small, especially for wide rows, so it's worthwhile to avoid creating them. It's not possible to just skip creating the slot - it's currently used to determine the tuple descriptor returned by ExecGetResultType(). So separate the determination of the result type from the slot creation. The work previously done internally ExecInitResultTupleSlotTL() can now also be done separately with ExecInitResultTypeTL() and ExecInitResultSlot(). That way nodes that aren't guaranteed to need a result slot, can use ExecInitResultTypeTL() to determine the result type of the node, and ExecAssignScanProjectionInfo() (via ExecConditionalAssignProjectionInfo()) determines that a result slot is needed, it is created with ExecInitResultSlot(). Besides the advantage of avoiding to create slots that then are unused, this is necessary preparation for later patches around tuple table slot abstraction. In particular separating the return descriptor and slot is a prerequisite to allow JITing of tuple deforming with knowledge of the underlying tuple format, and to avoid unnecessarily creating JITed tuple deforming for virtual slots. This commit removes a redundant argument from ExecInitResultTupleSlotTL(). While this commit touches a lot of the relevant lines anyway, it'd normally still not worthwhile to cause breakage, except that aforementioned later commits will touch *all* ExecInitResultTupleSlotTL() callers anyway (but fits worse thematically). Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
2018-11-09 20:19:39 -05:00
* Initialize result type and projection.
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
*/
Don't require return slots for nodes without projection. In a lot of nodes the return slot is not required. That can either be because the node doesn't do any projection (say an Append node), or because the node does perform projections but the projection is optimized away because the projection would yield an identical row. Slots aren't that small, especially for wide rows, so it's worthwhile to avoid creating them. It's not possible to just skip creating the slot - it's currently used to determine the tuple descriptor returned by ExecGetResultType(). So separate the determination of the result type from the slot creation. The work previously done internally ExecInitResultTupleSlotTL() can now also be done separately with ExecInitResultTypeTL() and ExecInitResultSlot(). That way nodes that aren't guaranteed to need a result slot, can use ExecInitResultTypeTL() to determine the result type of the node, and ExecAssignScanProjectionInfo() (via ExecConditionalAssignProjectionInfo()) determines that a result slot is needed, it is created with ExecInitResultSlot(). Besides the advantage of avoiding to create slots that then are unused, this is necessary preparation for later patches around tuple table slot abstraction. In particular separating the return descriptor and slot is a prerequisite to allow JITing of tuple deforming with knowledge of the underlying tuple format, and to avoid unnecessarily creating JITed tuple deforming for virtual slots. This commit removes a redundant argument from ExecInitResultTupleSlotTL(). While this commit touches a lot of the relevant lines anyway, it'd normally still not worthwhile to cause breakage, except that aforementioned later commits will touch *all* ExecInitResultTupleSlotTL() callers anyway (but fits worse thematically). Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
2018-11-09 20:19:39 -05:00
ExecInitResultTypeTL(&scanstate->ss.ps);
Allow tupleslots to have a fixed tupledesc, use in executor nodes. The reason for doing so is that it will allow expression evaluation to optimize based on the underlying tupledesc. In particular it will allow to JIT tuple deforming together with the expression itself. For that expression initialization needs to be moved after the relevant slots are initialized - mostly unproblematic, except in the case of nodeWorktablescan.c. After doing so there's no need for ExecAssignResultType() and ExecAssignResultTypeFromTL() anymore, as all former callers have been converted to create a slot with a fixed descriptor. When creating a slot with a fixed descriptor, tts_values/isnull can be allocated together with the main slot, reducing allocation overhead and increasing cache density a bit. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171206093717.vqdxe5icqttpxs3p@alap3.anarazel.de
2018-02-17 00:17:38 -05:00
ExecAssignScanProjectionInfo(&scanstate->ss);
/*
* initialize child expressions
*/
scanstate->ss.ps.qual =
ExecInitQual(node->scan.plan.qual, (PlanState *) scanstate);
scanstate->bitmapqualorig =
ExecInitQual(node->bitmapqualorig, (PlanState *) scanstate);
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
Allow per-tablespace effective_io_concurrency Per discussion, nowadays it is possible to have tablespaces that have wildly different I/O characteristics from others. Setting different effective_io_concurrency parameters for those has been measured to improve performance. Author: Julien Rouhaud Reviewed by: Andres Freund
2015-09-08 11:51:42 -04:00
/*
Simplify the effective_io_concurrency setting. The effective_io_concurrency GUC and equivalent tablespace option were previously passed through a formula based on a theory about RAID spindles and probabilities, to arrive at the number of pages to prefetch in bitmap heap scans. Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund and others argued that it was anachronistic and hard to justify, and commit 558a9165e08 already started down the path of bypassing it in new code. We agreed to drop that logic and use the value directly. For the default setting of 1, there is no change in effect. Higher settings can be converted from the old meaning to the new with: select round(sum(OLD / n::float)) from generate_series(1, OLD) s(n); We might want to consider renaming the GUC before the next release given the change in meaning, but it's not clear that many users had set it very carefully anyway. That decision is deferred for now. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJUw08dPs_3EUcdO6M90GnjofPYrWp4YSLaBkgYwS-AqA%40mail.gmail.com
2020-03-15 18:43:18 -04:00
* Maximum number of prefetches for the tablespace if configured,
* otherwise the current value of the effective_io_concurrency GUC.
Allow per-tablespace effective_io_concurrency Per discussion, nowadays it is possible to have tablespaces that have wildly different I/O characteristics from others. Setting different effective_io_concurrency parameters for those has been measured to improve performance. Author: Julien Rouhaud Reviewed by: Andres Freund
2015-09-08 11:51:42 -04:00
*/
Simplify the effective_io_concurrency setting. The effective_io_concurrency GUC and equivalent tablespace option were previously passed through a formula based on a theory about RAID spindles and probabilities, to arrive at the number of pages to prefetch in bitmap heap scans. Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund and others argued that it was anachronistic and hard to justify, and commit 558a9165e08 already started down the path of bypassing it in new code. We agreed to drop that logic and use the value directly. For the default setting of 1, there is no change in effect. Higher settings can be converted from the old meaning to the new with: select round(sum(OLD / n::float)) from generate_series(1, OLD) s(n); We might want to consider renaming the GUC before the next release given the change in meaning, but it's not clear that many users had set it very carefully anyway. That decision is deferred for now. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJUw08dPs_3EUcdO6M90GnjofPYrWp4YSLaBkgYwS-AqA%40mail.gmail.com
2020-03-15 18:43:18 -04:00
scanstate->prefetch_maximum =
Allow per-tablespace effective_io_concurrency Per discussion, nowadays it is possible to have tablespaces that have wildly different I/O characteristics from others. Setting different effective_io_concurrency parameters for those has been measured to improve performance. Author: Julien Rouhaud Reviewed by: Andres Freund
2015-09-08 11:51:42 -04:00
get_tablespace_io_concurrency(currentRelation->rd_rel->reltablespace);
Create executor and planner-backend support for decoupled heap and index scans, using in-memory tuple ID bitmaps as the intermediary. The planner frontend (path creation and cost estimation) is not there yet, so none of this code can be executed. I have tested it using some hacked planner code that is far too ugly to see the light of day, however. Committing now so that the bulk of the infrastructure changes go in before the tree drifts under me.
2005-04-19 18:35:18 -04:00
scanstate->ss.ss_currentRelation = currentRelation;
/*
* all done.
*/
return scanstate;
}
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
/*----------------
* BitmapShouldInitializeSharedState
*
* The first process to come here and see the state to the BM_INITIAL
* will become the leader for the parallel bitmap scan and will be
* responsible for populating the TIDBitmap. The other processes will
* be blocked by the condition variable until the leader wakes them up.
* ---------------
*/
static bool
BitmapShouldInitializeSharedState(ParallelBitmapHeapState *pstate)
{
SharedBitmapState state;
while (1)
{
SpinLockAcquire(&pstate->mutex);
state = pstate->state;
if (pstate->state == BM_INITIAL)
pstate->state = BM_INPROGRESS;
SpinLockRelease(&pstate->mutex);
/* Exit if bitmap is done, or if we're the leader. */
if (state != BM_INPROGRESS)
break;
/* Wait for the leader to wake us up. */
ConditionVariableSleep(&pstate->cv, WAIT_EVENT_PARALLEL_BITMAP_SCAN);
}
ConditionVariableCancelSleep();
return (state == BM_INITIAL);
}
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ExecBitmapHeapEstimate
*
Improve comments for parallel executor estimation functions. The previous comment (which was copied as boilerplate from one file to the next) implied that it was the executor node itself which was being serialized, but that's not right. We're not serializing the executor nodes; we're just allowing them to store some additional information in DSM. Adjusts the comment to reflect this. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaHVinxG=3h6qBAsyV8xaDyQwbzK7YZnYfE8nJFMK1=FA@mail.gmail.com
2017-10-28 05:50:22 -04:00
* Compute the amount of space we'll need in the parallel
* query DSM, and inform pcxt->estimator about our needs.
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
void
ExecBitmapHeapEstimate(BitmapHeapScanState *node,
ParallelContext *pcxt)
{
Show Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan worker stats in EXPLAIN ANALYZE Nodes like Memoize report the cache stats for each parallel worker, so it makes sense to show the exact and lossy pages in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan in a similar way. Likewise, Sort shows the method and memory used for each worker. There was some discussion on whether the leader stats should include the totals for each parallel worker or not. I did some analysis on this to see what other parallel node types do and it seems only Parallel Hash does anything like this. All the rest, per what's supported by ExecParallelRetrieveInstrumentation() are consistent with each other. Author: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Author: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Author: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Christofides <michael@pgmustard.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Ikeda <Masahiro.Ikeda@nttdata.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b3d80961-c2e5-38cc-6a32-61886cdf766d%40gmail.com
2024-07-08 20:15:47 -04:00
Size size;
size = MAXALIGN(sizeof(ParallelBitmapHeapState));
/* account for instrumentation, if required */
if (node->ss.ps.instrument && pcxt->nworkers > 0)
{
size = add_size(size, offsetof(SharedBitmapHeapInstrumentation, sinstrument));
size = add_size(size, mul_size(pcxt->nworkers, sizeof(BitmapHeapScanInstrumentation)));
}
shm_toc_estimate_chunk(&pcxt->estimator, size);
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
shm_toc_estimate_keys(&pcxt->estimator, 1);
}
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ExecBitmapHeapInitializeDSM
*
* Set up a parallel bitmap heap scan descriptor.
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
void
ExecBitmapHeapInitializeDSM(BitmapHeapScanState *node,
ParallelContext *pcxt)
{
ParallelBitmapHeapState *pstate;
Show Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan worker stats in EXPLAIN ANALYZE Nodes like Memoize report the cache stats for each parallel worker, so it makes sense to show the exact and lossy pages in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan in a similar way. Likewise, Sort shows the method and memory used for each worker. There was some discussion on whether the leader stats should include the totals for each parallel worker or not. I did some analysis on this to see what other parallel node types do and it seems only Parallel Hash does anything like this. All the rest, per what's supported by ExecParallelRetrieveInstrumentation() are consistent with each other. Author: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Author: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Author: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Christofides <michael@pgmustard.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Ikeda <Masahiro.Ikeda@nttdata.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b3d80961-c2e5-38cc-6a32-61886cdf766d%40gmail.com
2024-07-08 20:15:47 -04:00
SharedBitmapHeapInstrumentation *sinstrument = NULL;
Teach bitmap heap scan to cope with absence of a DSA. If we have a plan that uses parallelism but are unable to execute it using parallelism, for example due to a lack of available DSM segments, then the EState's es_query_dsa will be NULL. Parallel bitmap heap scan needs to fall back to a non-parallel scan in such cases. Patch by me, reviewed by Dilip Kumar Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0kADK5inNf_KuemjX=HQ=PuTP0DykM--fO5jS5ePVFEA@mail.gmail.com
2017-11-28 11:39:16 -05:00
dsa_area *dsa = node->ss.ps.state->es_query_dsa;
Show Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan worker stats in EXPLAIN ANALYZE Nodes like Memoize report the cache stats for each parallel worker, so it makes sense to show the exact and lossy pages in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan in a similar way. Likewise, Sort shows the method and memory used for each worker. There was some discussion on whether the leader stats should include the totals for each parallel worker or not. I did some analysis on this to see what other parallel node types do and it seems only Parallel Hash does anything like this. All the rest, per what's supported by ExecParallelRetrieveInstrumentation() are consistent with each other. Author: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Author: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Author: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Christofides <michael@pgmustard.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Ikeda <Masahiro.Ikeda@nttdata.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b3d80961-c2e5-38cc-6a32-61886cdf766d%40gmail.com
2024-07-08 20:15:47 -04:00
char *ptr;
Size size;
Teach bitmap heap scan to cope with absence of a DSA. If we have a plan that uses parallelism but are unable to execute it using parallelism, for example due to a lack of available DSM segments, then the EState's es_query_dsa will be NULL. Parallel bitmap heap scan needs to fall back to a non-parallel scan in such cases. Patch by me, reviewed by Dilip Kumar Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0kADK5inNf_KuemjX=HQ=PuTP0DykM--fO5jS5ePVFEA@mail.gmail.com
2017-11-28 11:39:16 -05:00
/* If there's no DSA, there are no workers; initialize nothing. */
if (dsa == NULL)
return;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
Show Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan worker stats in EXPLAIN ANALYZE Nodes like Memoize report the cache stats for each parallel worker, so it makes sense to show the exact and lossy pages in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan in a similar way. Likewise, Sort shows the method and memory used for each worker. There was some discussion on whether the leader stats should include the totals for each parallel worker or not. I did some analysis on this to see what other parallel node types do and it seems only Parallel Hash does anything like this. All the rest, per what's supported by ExecParallelRetrieveInstrumentation() are consistent with each other. Author: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Author: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Author: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Christofides <michael@pgmustard.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Ikeda <Masahiro.Ikeda@nttdata.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b3d80961-c2e5-38cc-6a32-61886cdf766d%40gmail.com
2024-07-08 20:15:47 -04:00
size = MAXALIGN(sizeof(ParallelBitmapHeapState));
if (node->ss.ps.instrument && pcxt->nworkers > 0)
{
size = add_size(size, offsetof(SharedBitmapHeapInstrumentation, sinstrument));
size = add_size(size, mul_size(pcxt->nworkers, sizeof(BitmapHeapScanInstrumentation)));
}
ptr = shm_toc_allocate(pcxt->toc, size);
pstate = (ParallelBitmapHeapState *) ptr;
ptr += MAXALIGN(sizeof(ParallelBitmapHeapState));
if (node->ss.ps.instrument && pcxt->nworkers > 0)
sinstrument = (SharedBitmapHeapInstrumentation *) ptr;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
pstate->tbmiterator = 0;
pstate->prefetch_iterator = 0;
/* Initialize the mutex */
SpinLockInit(&pstate->mutex);
pstate->prefetch_pages = 0;
pstate->prefetch_target = 0;
pstate->state = BM_INITIAL;
ConditionVariableInit(&pstate->cv);
Show Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan worker stats in EXPLAIN ANALYZE Nodes like Memoize report the cache stats for each parallel worker, so it makes sense to show the exact and lossy pages in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan in a similar way. Likewise, Sort shows the method and memory used for each worker. There was some discussion on whether the leader stats should include the totals for each parallel worker or not. I did some analysis on this to see what other parallel node types do and it seems only Parallel Hash does anything like this. All the rest, per what's supported by ExecParallelRetrieveInstrumentation() are consistent with each other. Author: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Author: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Author: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Christofides <michael@pgmustard.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Ikeda <Masahiro.Ikeda@nttdata.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b3d80961-c2e5-38cc-6a32-61886cdf766d%40gmail.com
2024-07-08 20:15:47 -04:00
if (sinstrument)
{
sinstrument->num_workers = pcxt->nworkers;
/* ensure any unfilled slots will contain zeroes */
memset(sinstrument->sinstrument, 0,
pcxt->nworkers * sizeof(BitmapHeapScanInstrumentation));
}
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
shm_toc_insert(pcxt->toc, node->ss.ps.plan->plan_node_id, pstate);
node->pstate = pstate;
Show Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan worker stats in EXPLAIN ANALYZE Nodes like Memoize report the cache stats for each parallel worker, so it makes sense to show the exact and lossy pages in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan in a similar way. Likewise, Sort shows the method and memory used for each worker. There was some discussion on whether the leader stats should include the totals for each parallel worker or not. I did some analysis on this to see what other parallel node types do and it seems only Parallel Hash does anything like this. All the rest, per what's supported by ExecParallelRetrieveInstrumentation() are consistent with each other. Author: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Author: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Author: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Christofides <michael@pgmustard.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Ikeda <Masahiro.Ikeda@nttdata.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b3d80961-c2e5-38cc-6a32-61886cdf766d%40gmail.com
2024-07-08 20:15:47 -04:00
node->sinstrument = sinstrument;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
}
Separate reinitialization of shared parallel-scan state from ExecReScan. Previously, the parallel executor logic did reinitialization of shared state within the ExecReScan code for parallel-aware scan nodes. This is problematic, because it means that the ExecReScan call has to occur synchronously (ie, during the parent Gather node's ReScan call). That is swimming very much against the tide so far as the ExecReScan machinery is concerned; the fact that it works at all today depends on a lot of fragile assumptions, such as that no plan node between Gather and a parallel-aware scan node is parameterized. Another objection is that because ExecReScan might be called in workers as well as the leader, hacky extra tests are needed in some places to prevent unwanted shared-state resets. Hence, let's separate this code into two functions, a ReInitializeDSM call and the ReScan call proper. ReInitializeDSM is called only in the leader and is guaranteed to run before we start new workers. ReScan is returned to its traditional function of resetting only local state, which means that ExecReScan's usual habits of delaying or eliminating child rescan calls are safe again. As with the preceding commit 7df2c1f8d, it doesn't seem to be necessary to make these changes in 9.6, which is a good thing because the FDW and CustomScan APIs are impacted. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1JkByysFJNh9M349u_nNjqETuEnY_y1VUc_kJiU0bxtaQ@mail.gmail.com
2017-08-30 13:18:16 -04:00
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ExecBitmapHeapReInitializeDSM
*
* Reset shared state before beginning a fresh scan.
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
void
ExecBitmapHeapReInitializeDSM(BitmapHeapScanState *node,
ParallelContext *pcxt)
{
ParallelBitmapHeapState *pstate = node->pstate;
dsa_area *dsa = node->ss.ps.state->es_query_dsa;
Teach bitmap heap scan to cope with absence of a DSA. If we have a plan that uses parallelism but are unable to execute it using parallelism, for example due to a lack of available DSM segments, then the EState's es_query_dsa will be NULL. Parallel bitmap heap scan needs to fall back to a non-parallel scan in such cases. Patch by me, reviewed by Dilip Kumar Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0kADK5inNf_KuemjX=HQ=PuTP0DykM--fO5jS5ePVFEA@mail.gmail.com
2017-11-28 11:39:16 -05:00
/* If there's no DSA, there are no workers; do nothing. */
if (dsa == NULL)
return;
Separate reinitialization of shared parallel-scan state from ExecReScan. Previously, the parallel executor logic did reinitialization of shared state within the ExecReScan code for parallel-aware scan nodes. This is problematic, because it means that the ExecReScan call has to occur synchronously (ie, during the parent Gather node's ReScan call). That is swimming very much against the tide so far as the ExecReScan machinery is concerned; the fact that it works at all today depends on a lot of fragile assumptions, such as that no plan node between Gather and a parallel-aware scan node is parameterized. Another objection is that because ExecReScan might be called in workers as well as the leader, hacky extra tests are needed in some places to prevent unwanted shared-state resets. Hence, let's separate this code into two functions, a ReInitializeDSM call and the ReScan call proper. ReInitializeDSM is called only in the leader and is guaranteed to run before we start new workers. ReScan is returned to its traditional function of resetting only local state, which means that ExecReScan's usual habits of delaying or eliminating child rescan calls are safe again. As with the preceding commit 7df2c1f8d, it doesn't seem to be necessary to make these changes in 9.6, which is a good thing because the FDW and CustomScan APIs are impacted. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1JkByysFJNh9M349u_nNjqETuEnY_y1VUc_kJiU0bxtaQ@mail.gmail.com
2017-08-30 13:18:16 -04:00
pstate->state = BM_INITIAL;
if (DsaPointerIsValid(pstate->tbmiterator))
tbm_free_shared_area(dsa, pstate->tbmiterator);
if (DsaPointerIsValid(pstate->prefetch_iterator))
tbm_free_shared_area(dsa, pstate->prefetch_iterator);
pstate->tbmiterator = InvalidDsaPointer;
pstate->prefetch_iterator = InvalidDsaPointer;
}
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ExecBitmapHeapInitializeWorker
*
* Copy relevant information from TOC into planstate.
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
void
Provide DSM segment to ExecXXXInitializeWorker functions. Previously, executor nodes running in parallel worker processes didn't have access to the dsm_segment object used for parallel execution. In order to support resource management based on DSM segment lifetime, they need that. So create a ParallelWorkerContext object to hold it and pass it to all InitializeWorker functions. Author: Thomas Munro Reviewed-By: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=2W=cOkiZxcg6qiFQP-dHUe09aqTrEMM7yJDrHMhDv_RA@mail.gmail.com
2017-11-16 20:28:11 -05:00
ExecBitmapHeapInitializeWorker(BitmapHeapScanState *node,
ParallelWorkerContext *pwcxt)
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
{
Show Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan worker stats in EXPLAIN ANALYZE Nodes like Memoize report the cache stats for each parallel worker, so it makes sense to show the exact and lossy pages in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan in a similar way. Likewise, Sort shows the method and memory used for each worker. There was some discussion on whether the leader stats should include the totals for each parallel worker or not. I did some analysis on this to see what other parallel node types do and it seems only Parallel Hash does anything like this. All the rest, per what's supported by ExecParallelRetrieveInstrumentation() are consistent with each other. Author: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Author: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Author: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Christofides <michael@pgmustard.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Ikeda <Masahiro.Ikeda@nttdata.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b3d80961-c2e5-38cc-6a32-61886cdf766d%40gmail.com
2024-07-08 20:15:47 -04:00
char *ptr;
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
Teach bitmap heap scan to cope with absence of a DSA. If we have a plan that uses parallelism but are unable to execute it using parallelism, for example due to a lack of available DSM segments, then the EState's es_query_dsa will be NULL. Parallel bitmap heap scan needs to fall back to a non-parallel scan in such cases. Patch by me, reviewed by Dilip Kumar Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0kADK5inNf_KuemjX=HQ=PuTP0DykM--fO5jS5ePVFEA@mail.gmail.com
2017-11-28 11:39:16 -05:00
Assert(node->ss.ps.state->es_query_dsa != NULL);
Show Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan worker stats in EXPLAIN ANALYZE Nodes like Memoize report the cache stats for each parallel worker, so it makes sense to show the exact and lossy pages in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan in a similar way. Likewise, Sort shows the method and memory used for each worker. There was some discussion on whether the leader stats should include the totals for each parallel worker or not. I did some analysis on this to see what other parallel node types do and it seems only Parallel Hash does anything like this. All the rest, per what's supported by ExecParallelRetrieveInstrumentation() are consistent with each other. Author: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Author: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Author: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Christofides <michael@pgmustard.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Donghang Lin <donghanglin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Ikeda <Masahiro.Ikeda@nttdata.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b3d80961-c2e5-38cc-6a32-61886cdf766d%40gmail.com
2024-07-08 20:15:47 -04:00
ptr = shm_toc_lookup(pwcxt->toc, node->ss.ps.plan->plan_node_id, false);
node->pstate = (ParallelBitmapHeapState *) ptr;
ptr += MAXALIGN(sizeof(ParallelBitmapHeapState));
if (node->ss.ps.instrument)
node->sinstrument = (SharedBitmapHeapInstrumentation *) ptr;
}
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ExecBitmapHeapRetrieveInstrumentation
*
* Transfer bitmap heap scan statistics from DSM to private memory.
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
void
ExecBitmapHeapRetrieveInstrumentation(BitmapHeapScanState *node)
{
SharedBitmapHeapInstrumentation *sinstrument = node->sinstrument;
Size size;
if (sinstrument == NULL)
return;
size = offsetof(SharedBitmapHeapInstrumentation, sinstrument)
+ sinstrument->num_workers * sizeof(BitmapHeapScanInstrumentation);
node->sinstrument = palloc(size);
memcpy(node->sinstrument, sinstrument, size);
Support parallel bitmap heap scans. The index is scanned by a single process, but then all cooperating processes can iterate jointly over the resulting set of heap blocks. In the future, we might also want to support using a parallel bitmap index scan to set up for a parallel bitmap heap scan, but that's a job for another day. Dilip Kumar, with some corrections and cosmetic changes by me. The larger patch set of which this is a part has been reviewed and tested by (at least) Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar, Tushar Ahuja, Rafia Sabih, Haribabu Kommi, Thomas Munro, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uc4=0WxRGfCzs-xfkMYcSEWUC-Fon6thkJGjkh9i=13A@mail.gmail.com
2017-03-08 12:05:43 -05:00
}
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink