mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2026-04-08 18:51:56 -04:00
Mention DROP TABLE as well as ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT
... when talking about how good they are in replacement of bulk DELETE in partitioned setups. The original wording was a bit confusing. Per an observation from David Wheeler.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a03f1d399d
commit
247fd8105a
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -2320,7 +2320,8 @@ VALUES ('New York', NULL, NULL, 'NY');
|
|||
<para>
|
||||
Bulk loads and deletes can be accomplished by adding or removing
|
||||
partitions, if that requirement is planned into the partitioning design.
|
||||
<command>ALTER TABLE</> is far faster than a bulk operation.
|
||||
<command>ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT</> and <command>DROP TABLE</> are
|
||||
both far faster than a bulk operation.
|
||||
It also entirely avoids the <command>VACUUM</command>
|
||||
overhead caused by a bulk <command>DELETE</>.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue