The premise of src/test/modules/test_plan_advice is that if we plan
a query once, generate plan advice, and then replan it using that
same advice, all of that advice should apply cleanly, since the
settings and everything else are the same. Unfortunately, that's
not the case: the test suite is the main regression tests, and
concurrent activity can change the statistics on tables involved
in the query, especially system catalogs. That's OK as long as it
only affects costing, but in a few cases, it affects which relations
appear in the final plan at all.
In the buildfarm failures observed to date, this happens because
we consider alternative subplans for the same portion of the query;
in theory, MinMaxAggPath is vulnerable to a similar hazard. In both
cases, the planner clones an entire subquery, and the clone has a
different plan name, and therefore different range table identifiers,
than the original. If a cost change results in flipping between one
of these plans and the other, the test_plan_advice tests will fail,
because the range table identifiers to which advice was applied won't
even be present in the output of the second planning cycle.
To fix, invent a new DO_NOT_SCAN advice tag. When generating advice,
emit it for relations that should not appear in the final plan at
all, because some alternative version of that relation was used
instead. When DO_NOT_SCAN is supplied, disable all scan methods for
that relation.
To make this work, we reuse a bunch of the machinery that previously
existed for the purpose of ensuring that we build the same set of
relation identifiers during planning as we do from the final
PlannedStmt. In the process, this commit slightly weakens the
cross-check mechanism: before this commit, it would fire whenever
the pg_plan_advice module was loaded, even if pg_plan_advice wasn't
actually doing anything; now, it will only engage when we have some
other reason to create a pgpa_planner_state. The old way was complex
and didn't add much useful test coverage, so this seems like an
acceptable sacrifice.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYuWmN-00Ec5pY7zAcpSFQUQLbgAdVWGR9kOR-HM-fHrA@mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com>
The second half of this file is meant to test feedback, not
generated advice, and is meant to use the statements that it
prepares, not leftover prepared statements from earlier in the
file.
These mistakes resulted in failures under debug_discard_caches = 1,
because re-executing pt2 instead of executing pt4 for the first
time resulted in different output depending on whether the query
was replanned.
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> (per BF member avocet)
TOK_IDENT allows only non-keywords; identifier should be used
any place where either keywords or non-keywords should be accepted.
Hence, without this commit, any string that happens to be a keyword
can't be used as a partition schema, partition name, or plan name,
which is incorrect.
Author: Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com>
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAP53PkzKeD=t90OfeMsniYrcRe2THQbUx3g6wV17Y=ZtiwmWTQ@mail.gmail.com
Provide a facility that (1) can be used to stabilize certain plan choices
so that the planner cannot reverse course without authorization and
(2) can be used by knowledgeable users to insist on plan choices contrary
to what the planner believes best. In both cases, terrible outcomes are
possible: users should think twice and perhaps three times before
constraining the planner's ability to do as it thinks best; nevertheless,
there are problems that are much more easily solved with these facilities
than without them.
This patch takes the approach of analyzing a finished plan to produce
textual output, which we call "plan advice", that describes key
decisions made during plan; if that plan advice is provided during
future planning cycles, it will force those key decisions to be made in
the same way. Not all planner decisions can be controlled using advice;
for example, decisions about how to perform aggregation are currently
out of scope, as is choice of sort order. Plan advice can also be edited
by the user, or even written from scratch in simple cases, making it
possible to generate outcomes that the planner would not have produced.
Partial advice can be provided to control some planner outcomes but not
others.
Currently, plan advice is focused only on specific outcomes, such as
the choice to use a sequential scan for a particular relation, and not
on estimates that might contribute to those outcomes, such as a
possibly-incorrect selectivity estimate. While it would be useful to
users to be able to provide plan advice that affects selectivity
estimates or other aspects of costing, that is out of scope for this
commit.
Reviewed-by: Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Burd <greg@burd.me>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Haibo Yan <tristan.yim@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dian Fay <di@nmfay.com>
Reviewed-by: Ajay Pal <ajay.pal.k@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandra Wang <alexandra.wang.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ-Jh1T6QyWoCODMVQdhTUPYkaZjWztzP1En4=ZHoKPzw@mail.gmail.com
