UNIQUE/PRIMARY KEY ... WITHOUT OVERLAPS requires the no-overlap
column to be a range or multirange, but it should allow a domain
over such a type too. This requires minor adjustments in both
the parser and executor.
In passing, fix a nearby break-instead-of-continue thinko in
transformIndexConstraint. This had the effect of disabling
parse-time validation of the no-overlap column's type in the context
of ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT, if it follows a dropped column.
We'd still complain appropriately at runtime though.
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxGoAmN_0iJ=hjTG0vGpOSOyy-vYyfE+-q0AWxrq2_p5XQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
Having rejected the principle that we should know how to re-order
the sub-commands of CREATE SCHEMA, there is not really anything
except a little coding to stop us from supporting more object types.
This patch adds support for creating functions (including procedures
and aggregates), operators, types (including domains), collations,
and text search objects.
SQL:2021 specifies that we should allow functions, procedures,
types, domains, and collations, so this moves us a great deal
closer to full SQL compatibility of CREATE SCHEMA. What remains
missing from their list are casts, transforms, roles, and some
object types we don't support yet (e.g. CREATE CHARACTER SET).
Supporting casts or transforms would be problematic because
they don't have names at all, let alone schema-qualified names,
so it'd be quite a stretch to say that they belong to a schema.
Roles likewise are not schema-qualified, plus they are global
to a cluster, making it even less reasonable to consider them
as belonging to a schema. So I don't see us trying to complete
the list.
User-defined aggregates and operators are outside the spec's ken,
as are text search objects, so adding them does not do anything for
spec compatibility. But they go along with these other object types,
plus it takes no additional code to support them since they are
represented as DefineStmts like some variants of CREATE TYPE.
It would indeed take some effort to reject them.
Author: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALdSSPh4jUSDsWu3K58hjO60wnTRR0DuO4CKRcwa8EVuOSfXxg@mail.gmail.com
The previous patch simplified CREATE SCHEMA's behavior to "execute all
subcommands in the order they are written". However, that's a bit too
simple, as the spec clearly requires forward references in foreign key
constraint clauses to work, see feature F311-01. (Most other SQL
implementations seem to read more into the spec than that, but it's
not clear that there's justification for more in the text, and this is
the only case that doesn't introduce unresolvable issues.) We never
implemented that before, but let's do so now.
To fix it, transform FOREIGN KEY clauses into ALTER TABLE ... ADD
FOREIGN KEY commands and append them to the end of the CREATE SCHEMA's
subcommand list. This works because the foreign key constraints are
independent and don't affect any other DDL that might be in CREATE
SCHEMA. For simplicity, we do this for all FOREIGN KEY clauses even
if they would have worked where they were.
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1075425.1732993688@sss.pgh.pa.us
transformCreateSchemaStmtElements has always believed that it is
supposed to re-order the subcommands of CREATE SCHEMA into a safe
execution order. However, it is nowhere near being capable of doing
that correctly. Nor is there reason to think that it ever will be,
or that that is a well-defined requirement. (The SQL standard does
say that it should be possible to do foreign-key forward references
within CREATE SCHEMA, but it's not clear that the text requires
anything more than that.) Moreover, the problem will get worse as
we add more subcommand types. Let's just drop the whole idea and
execute the commands in the order given, which seems like a much
less astonishment-prone definition anyway. The foreign-key issue
will be handled in a follow-up patch.
This will result in a release-note-worthy incompatibility,
which is that forward references like
CREATE SCHEMA myschema
CREATE VIEW myview AS SELECT * FROM mytable
CREATE TABLE mytable (...);
used to work and no longer will. Considering how many closely
related variants never worked, this isn't much of a loss.
Along the way, pass down a ParseState so that we can provide an
error cursor for "wrong schema name" and related errors, and fix
transformCreateSchemaStmtElements so that it doesn't scribble
on the parsetree passed to it.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1075425.1732993688@sss.pgh.pa.us
Remove a bunch of #include lines from execnodes.h. Most of these
requier suitable typedefs to be added, so that it still compiles
standalone. In one case, the fix is to move a struct definition to the
one .c file where it is needed.
Also some light clean up in plannodes.h and genam.h, though not as
extensive as in execnodes.h.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202603131240.ihwqdxnj7w2o@alvherre.pgsql
Instead of using comments to mark fallthrough switch cases, use the
fallthrough attribute. This will (in the future, not here) allow
supporting other compilers besides gcc. The commenting convention is
only supported by gcc, the attribute is supported by clang, and in the
fullness of time the C23 standard attribute would allow supporting
other compilers as well.
Right now, we package the attribute into a macro called
pg_fallthrough. This commit defines that macro and replaces the
existing comments with that macro invocation.
We also raise the level of the gcc -Wimplicit-fallthrough= option from
3 to 5 to enforce the use of the attribute.
Reviewed-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/76a8efcd-925a-4eaf-bdd1-d972cd1a32ff%40eisentraut.org
When creating a partition for a RANGE partitioned table, the reporting
of errors relating to converting the specified range values into
constant values for the partition key's type could display the name of a
previous partition key column when an earlier range was specified as
MINVALUE or MAXVALUE.
This was caused by the code not correctly incrementing the index that
tracks which partition key the foreach loop was working on after
processing MINVALUE/MAXVALUE ranges.
Fix by using foreach_current_index() to ensure the index variable is
always set to the List element being worked on.
Author: myzhen <zhenmingyang@yeah.net>
Reviewed-by: zhibin wang <killerwzb@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/273cab52.978.19b96fc75e7.Coremail.zhenmingyang@yeah.net
Backpatch-through: 14
Replace ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_TABLE with ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE
for the case where we don't find a parent-child relationship between the
partitioned table and its partition. In this case, tables are present, but
they are not in a prerequisite state (no relationship).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNmBM%2B5qbrJMu60NxPn%2B0y-%3D2wXM-QVVs3xRp8NxFvDb9A%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
This patch mostly just fills in the field, although a few error
reports in resolve_unique_index_expr() are adjusted to use it.
The next commit will add more uses.
catversion bump out of an abundance of caution: I'm not sure
IndexElem can appear in stored rules, but I'm not sure it can't
either.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Co-authored-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxH3OgXF1hrzGAaWyNtye2jHEmk9JbtrtGv-KJK6tsGo5w@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202512121327.f2zimsr6guso@alvherre.pgsql
All the code paths updated here have been using relation_close() to
close a relation that has already been opened with table_open() or
index_open(), where a relkind check is enforced.
table_close() and index_open() do the same thing as relation_close(), so
there was no harm, but being inconsistent could lead to issues if the
internals of these close() functions begin to introduce some logic
specific to each relkind in the future.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aUKamYGiDKO6byp5@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
This new DDL command splits a single partition into several partitions. Just
like the ALTER TABLE ... MERGE PARTITIONS ... command, new partitions are
created using the createPartitionTable() function with the parent partition
as the template.
This commit comprises a quite naive implementation which works in a single
process and holds the ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK on the parent table during all
the operations, including the tuple routing. This is why the new DDL command
can't be recommended for large, partitioned tables under high load. However,
this implementation comes in handy in certain cases, even as it is. Also, it
could serve as a foundation for future implementations with less locking and
possibly parallelism.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c73a1746-0cd0-6bdd-6b23-3ae0b7c0c582%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsaker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Co-authored-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephane Tachoires <stephane.tachoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <dgustafsson@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
This new DDL command merges several partitions into a single partition of the
target table. The target partition is created using the new
createPartitionTable() function with the parent partition as the template.
This commit comprises a quite naive implementation which works in a single
process and holds the ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK on the parent table during all
the operations, including the tuple routing. This is why this new DDL
command can't be recommended for large partitioned tables under a high load.
However, this implementation comes in handy in certain cases, even as it is.
Also, it could serve as a foundation for future implementations with less
locking and possibly parallelism.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c73a1746-0cd0-6bdd-6b23-3ae0b7c0c582%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsaker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Co-authored-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephane Tachoires <stephane.tachoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <dgustafsson@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Commit 14e87ffa5c introduced support for adding comments to NOT NULL
constraints. However, CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING COMMENTS did not copy
these comments to the new table. This was an oversight in that commit.
This commit corrects the behavior by ensuring CREATE TABLE LIKE to also copy
the comments on NOT NULL constraints when INCLUDING COMMENTS is specified.
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/127debef-e558-4784-9e24-0d5eaf91e2d1@oss.nttdata.com
This expands the NOT ENFORCED constraint flag, previously only
supported for CHECK constraints (commit ca87c415e2), to foreign key
constraints.
Normally, when a foreign key constraint is created on a table, action
and check triggers are added to maintain data integrity. With this
patch, if a constraint is marked as NOT ENFORCED, integrity checks are
no longer required, making these triggers unnecessary. Consequently,
when creating a NOT ENFORCED foreign key constraint, triggers will not
be created, and the constraint will be marked as NOT VALID.
Similarly, if an existing foreign key constraint is changed to NOT
ENFORCED, the associated triggers will be dropped, and the constraint
will also be marked as NOT VALID. Conversely, if a NOT ENFORCED
foreign key constraint is changed to ENFORCED, the necessary triggers
will be created, and the will be changed to VALID by performing
necessary validation.
Since not-enforced foreign key constraints have no triggers, the
shortcut used for example in psql and pg_dump to skip looking for
foreign keys if the relation is known not to have triggers no longer
applies. (It already didn't work for partitioned tables.)
Author: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandra Wang <alexandra.wang.oss@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Triveni N <triveni.n@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAJ_b962c5AcYW9KUt_R_ER5qs3fUGbe4az-SP-vuwPS-w-AGA@mail.gmail.com
This was left out of the original patch for virtual generated columns
(commit 83ea6c5402).
This just involves a bit of extra work in the executor to expand the
generation expressions and run a "IS NOT NULL" test against them.
There is also a bit of work to make sure that not-null constraints are
checked during a table rewrite.
Author: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Navneet Kumar <thanit3111@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHArQysbDkWFmvK+D1TPHQWWTxWN15cMuUaTYX3xhQXgg@mail.gmail.com
The comment explained that ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT USING INDEX is
only supported with a btree index. (This is not being changed.) The
reason is to keep upgrades robust, as explained there. The other part
of the comment, that btree is the only unique index kind anyway, is
somewhat less true as we're trying to enable unique indexes other than
btree, and it's irrelevant to this check. There is a check for
indisunique earlier already. So just remove this part of the comment.
Author: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/E72EAA49-354D-4C2E-8EB9-255197F55330@enterprisedb.com
LIKE enables the creation of foreign tables based on the column
definitions, constraints and objects of the defined source relation(s).
This feature mirrors the behavior of CREATE TABLE LIKE, but ignores
the INCLUDING sub-options that do not make sense for foreign tables:
INDEXES, COMPRESSION, IDENTITY and STORAGE. The supported sub-options
are COMMENTS, CONSTRAINTS, DEFAULTS, GENERATED and STATISTICS, mapping
with the clauses already supported by the command.
Note that the restriction with LIKE in CREATE FOREIGN TABLE was added in
a0c6dfeecf.
Author: Zhang Mingli
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Sami Imseih, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/42d3f855-2275-4361-a42a-826172ca2dc4@Spark
This adds a new variant of generated columns that are computed on read
(like a view, unlike the existing stored generated columns, which are
computed on write, like a materialized view).
The syntax for the column definition is
... GENERATED ALWAYS AS (...) VIRTUAL
and VIRTUAL is also optional. VIRTUAL is the default rather than
STORED to match various other SQL products. (The SQL standard makes
no specification about this, but it also doesn't know about VIRTUAL or
STORED.) (Also, virtual views are the default, rather than
materialized views.)
Virtual generated columns are stored in tuples as null values. (A
very early version of this patch had the ambition to not store them at
all. But so much stuff breaks or gets confused if you have tuples
where a column in the middle is completely missing. This is a
compromise, and it still saves space over being forced to use stored
generated columns. If we ever find a way to improve this, a bit of
pg_upgrade cleverness could allow for upgrades to a newer scheme.)
The capabilities and restrictions of virtual generated columns are
mostly the same as for stored generated columns. In some cases, this
patch keeps virtual generated columns more restricted than they might
technically need to be, to keep the two kinds consistent. Some of
that could maybe be relaxed later after separate careful
considerations.
Some functionality that is currently not supported, but could possibly
be added as incremental features, some easier than others:
- index on or using a virtual column
- hence also no unique constraints on virtual columns
- extended statistics on virtual columns
- foreign-key constraints on virtual columns
- not-null constraints on virtual columns (check constraints are supported)
- ALTER TABLE / DROP EXPRESSION
- virtual column cannot have domain type
- virtual columns are not supported in logical replication
The tests in generated_virtual.sql have been copied over from
generated_stored.sql with the keyword replaced. This way we can make
sure the behavior is mostly aligned, and the differences can be
visible. Some tests for currently not supported features are
currently commented out.
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a368248e-69e4-40be-9c07-6c3b5880b0a6@eisentraut.org
This adds support for the NOT ENFORCED/ENFORCED flag for constraints,
with support for check constraints.
The plan is to eventually support this for foreign key constraints,
where it is typically more useful.
Note that CHECK constraints do not currently support ALTER operations,
so changing the enforceability of an existing constraint isn't
possible without dropping and recreating it. This could be added
later.
Author: Amul Sul <amul.sul@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Triveni N <triveni.n@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAJ_b962c5AcYW9KUt_R_ER5qs3fUGbe4az-SP-vuwPS-w-AGA@mail.gmail.com
The following commands gain some information about the error position in
the query, should they fail when looking at the type used:
- CREATE TYPE (LIKE)
- CREATE TABLE OF
Both are related to typenameType() where the type name lookup is done.
These calls gain the ParseState that already exists in these paths.
Author: Kirill Reshke, Jian He
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALdSSPhqfvKbDwqJaY=yEePi_aq61GmMpW88i6ZH7CMG_2Z4Cg@mail.gmail.com
We now create contype='n' pg_constraint rows for not-null constraints on
user tables. Only one such constraint is allowed for a column.
We propagate these constraints to other tables during operations such as
adding inheritance relationships, creating and attaching partitions and
creating tables LIKE other tables. These related constraints mostly
follow the well-known rules of conislocal and coninhcount that we have
for CHECK constraints, with some adaptations: for example, as opposed to
CHECK constraints, we don't match not-null ones by name when descending
a hierarchy to alter or remove it, instead matching by the name of the
column that they apply to. This means we don't require the constraint
names to be identical across a hierarchy.
The inheritance status of these constraints can be controlled: now we
can be sure that if a parent table has one, then all children will have
it as well. They can optionally be marked NO INHERIT, and then children
are free not to have one. (There's currently no support for altering a
NO INHERIT constraint into inheriting down the hierarchy, but that's a
desirable future feature.)
This also opens the door for having these constraints be marked NOT
VALID, as well as allowing UNIQUE+NOT NULL to be used for functional
dependency determination, as envisioned by commit e49ae8d3bc. It's
likely possible to allow DEFERRABLE constraints as followup work, as
well.
psql shows these constraints in \d+, though we may want to reconsider if
this turns out to be too noisy. Earlier versions of this patch hid
constraints that were on the same columns of the primary key, but I'm
not sure that that's very useful. If clutter is a problem, we might be
better off inventing a new \d++ command and not showing the constraints
in \d+.
For now, we omit these constraints on system catalog columns, because
they're unlikely to achieve anything.
The main difference to the previous attempt at this (b0e96f3119) is
that we now require that such a constraint always exists when a primary
key is in the column; we didn't require this previously which had a
number of unpalatable consequences. With this requirement, the code is
easier to reason about. For example:
- We no longer have "throwaway constraints" during pg_dump. We needed
those for the case where a table had a PK without a not-null
underneath, to prevent a slow scan of the data during restore of the
PK creation, which was particularly problematic for pg_upgrade.
- We no longer have to cope with attnotnull being set spuriously in
case a primary key is dropped indirectly (e.g., via DROP COLUMN).
Some bits of code in this patch were authored by Jian He.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Author: Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>
Reviewed-by: 何建 (jian he) <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: 王刚 (Tender Wang) <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202408310358.sdhumtyuy2ht@alvherre.pgsql
Since we introduced unlogged sequences in v15, identity sequences
have defaulted to having the same persistence as their owning table.
However, it is possible to change that with ALTER SEQUENCE, and
pg_dump tries to preserve the logged-ness of sequences when it doesn't
match (as indeed it wouldn't for an unlogged table from before v15).
The fly in the ointment is that ALTER SEQUENCE SET [UN]LOGGED fails
in binary-upgrade mode, because it needs to assign a new relfilenode
which we cannot permit in that mode. Thus, trying to pg_upgrade a
database containing a mismatching identity sequence failed.
To fix, add syntax to ADD/ALTER COLUMN GENERATED AS IDENTITY to allow
the sequence's persistence to be set correctly at creation, and use
that instead of ALTER SEQUENCE SET [UN]LOGGED in pg_dump. (I tried to
make SET [UN]LOGGED work without any pg_dump modifications, but that
seems too fragile to be a desirable answer. This way should be
markedly faster anyhow.)
In passing, document the previously-undocumented SEQUENCE NAME option
that pg_dump also relies on for identity sequences; I see no value
in trying to pretend it doesn't exist.
Per bug #18618 from Anthony Hsu.
Back-patch to v15 where we invented this stuff.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18618-d4eb26d669ed110a@postgresql.org
Add WITHOUT OVERLAPS clause to PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints.
These are backed by GiST indexes instead of B-tree indexes, since they
are essentially exclusion constraints with = for the scalar parts of
the key and && for the temporal part.
(previously committed as 46a0cd4cef, reverted by 46a0cd4cefb; the new
part is this:)
Because 'empty' && 'empty' is false, the temporal PK/UQ constraint
allowed duplicates, which is confusing to users and breaks internal
expectations. For instance, when GROUP BY checks functional
dependencies on the PK, it allows selecting other columns from the
table, but in the presence of duplicate keys you could get the value
from any of their rows. So we need to forbid empties.
This all means that at the moment we can only support ranges and
multiranges for temporal PK/UQs, unlike the original patch (above).
Documentation and tests for this are added. But this could
conceivably be extended by introducing some more general support for
the notion of "empty" for other types.
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+renyUApHgSZF9-nd-a0+OPGharLQLO=mDHcY4_qQ0+noCUVg@mail.gmail.com
transformTableLikeClause believed that it could process extended
statistics immediately because "the representation of CreateStatsStmt
doesn't depend on column numbers". That was true when extended stats
were first introduced, but it was falsified by the addition of
extended stats on expressions: the parsed expression tree is fed
forward by the LIKE option, and that will contain Vars. So if the
new table doesn't have attnums identical to the old one's (typically
because there are some dropped columns in the old one), that doesn't
work. The CREATE goes through, but it emits invalid statistics
objects that will cause problems later.
Fortunately, we already have logic that can adapt expression trees
to the possibly-new column numbering. To use it, we have to delay
processing of CREATE_TABLE_LIKE_STATISTICS into expandTableLikeClause,
just as for other LIKE options that involve expressions.
Per bug #18468 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to v14 where
extended statistics on expressions were added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18468-f5add190e3fa5902@postgresql.org
This feature set did not handle empty ranges correctly, and it's now
too late for PostgreSQL 17 to fix it.
The following commits are reverted:
6db4598fcb Add stratnum GiST support function
46a0cd4cef Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints
86232a49a4 Fix comment on gist_stratnum_btree
030e10ff1a Rename pg_constraint.conwithoutoverlaps to conperiod
a88c800deb Use daterange and YMD in without_overlaps tests instead of tsrange.
5577a71fb0 Use half-open interval notation in without_overlaps tests
34768ee361 Add temporal FOREIGN KEY contraints
482e108cd3 Add test for REPLICA IDENTITY with a temporal key
c3db1f30cb doc: clarify PERIOD and WITHOUT OVERLAPS in CREATE TABLE
144c2ce0cc Fix ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE for temporal indexes
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d0b64a7a-dfe4-4b84-a906-c7dedfa40a3e@eisentraut.org
There are some problems with the new way to handle these constraints
that were detected at the last minute, and require fixes that appear too
invasive to be doing this late in the cycle. Revert this (again) for
now, we'll try again with these problems fixed.
The following commits are reverted:
b0e96f3119 Catalog not-null constraints
9b581c5341 Disallow changing NO INHERIT status of a not-null constraint
d0ec2ddbe0 Fix not-null constraint test
ac22a9545c Move privilege check to the right place
b0f7dd915b Check stack depth in new recursive functions
3af7217942 Update information_schema definition for not-null constraints
c3709100be Fix propagating attnotnull in multiple inheritance
d9f686a72e Fix restore of not-null constraints with inheritance
d72d32f52d Don't try to assign smart names to constraints
0cd711271d Better handle indirect constraint drops
13daa33fa5 Disallow NO INHERIT not-null constraints on partitioned tables
d45597f72f Disallow direct change of NO INHERIT of not-null constraints
21ac38f498 Fix inconsistencies in error messages
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202405110940.joxlqcx4dogd@alvherre.pgsql
Currently, we check only owner permission for the parent table before
MERGE/SPLIT partition operations. This leads to a security hole when users
can get access to the data of partitions without permission. This commit
fixes this problem by requiring owner permission on all the partitions
involved.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0520c72e-8d97-245e-53f9-173beca2ab2e%40gmail.com
Author: Dmitry Koval, Alexander Korotkov
When changing the data type of a column of a partitioned table, craft
the ALTER SEQUENCE command only once. Partitions do not have identity
sequences of their own and thus do not need a ALTER SEQUENCE command
for each partition.
Fix getIdentitySequence() to fetch the identity sequence associated
with the top-level partitioned table when a Relation of a partition is
passed to it. While doing so, translate the attribute number of the
partition into the attribute number of the partitioned table.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3b8a9dc1-bbc7-0ef5-6863-c432afac7d59@gmail.com
Such constraints are semantically useless and only bring weird cases
along, so reject them.
As a side effect, we can no longer have "throwaway" constraints in
pg_dump for primary keys in partitioned tables, but since they don't
serve any useful purpose, we can just omit them.
Maybe this should be done for all types of constraints, but it's just
not-null ones that acquired this "ability" in the 17 timeframe, so for
the moment I'm not changing anything else.
Per note by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7d923a66-55f0-3395-cd40-81c142b5448b@gmail.com
This fixes various typos, duplicated words, and tiny bits of whitespace
mainly in code comments but also in docs.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Author: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Author: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3F577953-A29E-4722-98AD-2DA9EFF2CBB8@yesql.se
This new DDL command splits a single partition into several parititions.
Just like ALTER TABLE ... MERGE PARTITIONS ... command, new patitions are
created using createPartitionTable() function with parent partition as the
template.
This commit comprises quite naive implementation which works in single process
and holds the ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK on the parent table during all the
operations including the tuple routing. This is why this new DDL command
can't be recommended for large partitioned tables under a high load. However,
this implementation come in handy in certain cases even as is.
Also, it could be used as a foundation for future implementations with lesser
locking and possibly parallel.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c73a1746-0cd0-6bdd-6b23-3ae0b7c0c582%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Dmitry Koval
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent, Laurenz Albe, Zhihong Yu, Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Robert Haas, Stephane Tachoires
This new DDL command merges several partitions into the one partition of the
target table. The target partition is created using new
createPartitionTable() function with parent partition as the template.
This commit comprises quite naive implementation which works in single process
and holds the ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK on the parent table during all the
operations including the tuple routing. This is why this new DDL command
can't be recommended for large partitioned tables under a high load. However,
this implementation come in handy in certain cases even as is.
Also, it could be used as a foundation for future implementations with lesser
locking and possibly parallel.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c73a1746-0cd0-6bdd-6b23-3ae0b7c0c582%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Dmitry Koval
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent, Laurenz Albe, Zhihong Yu, Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Robert Haas, Stephane Tachoires
A child table can specify a compression or storage method different
from its parents. This was previously an error. (But this was
inconsistently enforced because for example the settings could be
changed later using ALTER TABLE.) This now also allows an explicit
override if multiple parents have different compression or storage
settings, which was previously an error that could not be overridden.
The compression and storage properties remains unchanged in a child
inheriting from parent(s) after its creation, i.e., when using ALTER
TABLE ... INHERIT. (This is not changed.)
Before this change, the error detail would mention the first pair of
conflicting parent compression or storage methods. But with this
change it waits till the child specification is considered by which
time we may have encountered many such conflicting pairs. Hence the
error detail after this change does not include the conflicting
compression/storage methods. Those can be obtained from parent
definitions if necessary. The code to maintain list of all
conflicting methods or even the first conflicting pair does not seem
worth the convenience it offers. This change is inline with what we
do with conflicting default values.
Before this commit, the specified storage method could be stored in
ColumnDef::storage (CREATE TABLE ... LIKE) or ColumnDef::storage_name
(CREATE TABLE ...). This caused the MergeChildAttribute() and
MergeInheritedAttribute() to ignore a storage method specified in the
child definition since it looked only at ColumnDef::storage. This
commit removes ColumnDef::storage and instead uses
ColumnDef::storage_name to save any storage method specification. This
is similar to how compression method specification is handled.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/24656cec-d6ef-4d15-8b5b-e8dfc9c833a7@eisentraut.org
Fix for 344d62fb9a: That commit introduced unlogged sequences and
made it so that identity/serial sequences automatically get the
persistence level of their owning table. But this works only for
CREATE TABLE and not for ALTER TABLE / ADD COLUMN. The latter would
always create the sequence as logged (default), independent of the
persistence setting of the table. This is fixed here.
Note: It is allowed to change the persistence of identity sequences
directly using ALTER SEQUENCE. So mistakes in existing databases can
be fixed manually.
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/c4b6e2ed-bcdf-4ea7-965f-e49761094827%40eisentraut.org
Add WITHOUT OVERLAPS clause to PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints.
These are backed by GiST indexes instead of B-tree indexes, since they
are essentially exclusion constraints with = for the scalar parts of
the key and && for the temporal part.
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+renyUApHgSZF9-nd-a0+OPGharLQLO=mDHcY4_qQ0+noCUVg@mail.gmail.com
This unifies some repetitive code.
Note: I didn't push the "not found" error message into the new
function, even though all existing callers would be able to make use
of it. Using the existing error handling as-is would probably require
exposing the Relation type via tupdesc.h, which doesn't seem
desirable. (Or even if we changed it to just report the OID, it would
inject the concept of a relation containing the tuple descriptor into
tupdesc.h, which might be a layering violation. Perhaps some further
improvements could be considered here separately.)
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/52a125e4-ff9a-95f5-9f61-b87cf447e4da%40eisentraut.org
We now create contype='n' pg_constraint rows for not-null constraints.
We propagate these constraints to other tables during operations such as
adding inheritance relationships, creating and attaching partitions and
creating tables LIKE other tables. We also spawn not-null constraints
for inheritance child tables when their parents have primary keys.
These related constraints mostly follow the well-known rules of
conislocal and coninhcount that we have for CHECK constraints, with some
adaptations: for example, as opposed to CHECK constraints, we don't
match not-null ones by name when descending a hierarchy to alter it,
instead matching by column name that they apply to. This means we don't
require the constraint names to be identical across a hierarchy.
For now, we omit them for system catalogs. Maybe this is worth
reconsidering. We don't support NOT VALID nor DEFERRABLE clauses
either; these can be added as separate features later (this patch is
already large and complicated enough.)
psql shows these constraints in \d+.
pg_dump requires some ad-hoc hacks, particularly when dumping a primary
key. We now create one "throwaway" not-null constraint for each column
in the PK together with the CREATE TABLE command, and once the PK is
created, all those throwaway constraints are removed. This avoids
having to check each tuple for nullness when the dump restores the
primary key creation.
pg_upgrading from an older release requires a somewhat brittle procedure
to create a constraint state that matches what would be created if the
database were being created fresh in Postgres 17. I have tested all the
scenarios I could think of, and it works correctly as far as I can tell,
but I could have neglected weird cases.
This patch has been very long in the making. The first patch was
written by Bernd Helmle in 2010 to add a new pg_constraint.contype value
('n'), which I (Álvaro) then hijacked in 2011 and 2012, until that one
was killed by the realization that we ought to use contype='c' instead:
manufactured CHECK constraints. However, later SQL standard
development, as well as nonobvious emergent properties of that design
(mostly, failure to distinguish them from "normal" CHECK constraints as
well as the performance implication of having to test the CHECK
expression) led us to reconsider this choice, so now the current
implementation uses contype='n' again. During Postgres 16 this had
already been introduced by commit e056c557ae, but there were some
problems mainly with the pg_upgrade procedure that couldn't be fixed in
reasonable time, so it was reverted.
In 2016 Vitaly Burovoy also worked on this feature[1] but found no
consensus for his proposed approach, which was claimed to be closer to
the letter of the standard, requiring an additional pg_attribute column
to track the OID of the not-null constraint for that column.
[1] https://postgr.es/m/CAKOSWNkN6HSyatuys8xZxzRCR-KL1OkHS5-b9qd9bf1Rad3PLA@mail.gmail.com
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Author: Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Previously we only allowed unique B-tree constraints on partitions
(and only if the constraint included all the partition keys). But we
could allow exclusion constraints with the same restriction. We also
require that those columns be compared for equality, not something
like &&.
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ec8b1d9b-502e-d1f8-e909-1bf9dffe6fa5@illuminatedcomputing.com
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.
This set of diffs is a bit larger than typical. We've updated to
pg_bsd_indent 2.1.2, which properly indents variable declarations that
have multi-line initialization expressions (the continuation lines are
now indented one tab stop). We've also updated to perltidy version
20230309 and changed some of its settings, which reduces its desire to
add whitespace to lines to make assignments etc. line up. Going
forward, that should make for fewer random-seeming changes to existing
code.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230428092545.qfb3y5wcu4cm75ur@alvherre.pgsql
