Commit graph

7918 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Amit Kapila
9649f1adfd Fix CI failure introduced in commit 851f6649cc.
The test added in commit 851f6649cc uses a backup taken from a node
created by the previous test to perform standby related checks. On
Windows, however, the standby failed to start with the following error:
FATAL:  could not rename file "backup_label" to "backup_label.old": Permission denied

This occurred because some background sessions from the earlier test were
still active. These leftover processes continued accessing the parent
directory of the backup_label file, likely preventing the rename and
causing the failure. Ensuring that these sessions are cleanly terminated
resolves the issue in local testing.

Additionally, the has_restoring => 1 option has been removed, as it was
not required by the new test.

Reported-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 17
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobdVhO0ckZfsBZ0wqDO4qHVCwZZx8sf=EinafvUam-dsQ@mail.gmail.com
2026-01-29 02:57:02 +00:00
Amit Kapila
3243c0177e Prevent invalidation of newly synced replication slots.
A race condition could cause a newly synced replication slot to become
invalidated between its initial sync and the checkpoint.

When syncing a replication slot to a standby, the slot's initial
restart_lsn is taken from the publisher's remote_restart_lsn. Because slot
sync happens asynchronously, this value can lag behind the standby's
current redo pointer. Without any interlocking between WAL reservation and
checkpoints, a checkpoint may remove WAL required by the newly synced
slot, causing the slot to be invalidated.

To fix this, we acquire ReplicationSlotAllocationLock before reserving WAL
for a newly synced slot, similar to commit 006dd4b2e5. This ensures that
if WAL reservation happens first, the checkpoint process must wait for
slotsync to update the slot's restart_lsn before it computes the minimum
required LSN.

However, unlike in ReplicationSlotReserveWal(), this lock alone cannot
protect a newly synced slot if a checkpoint has already run
CheckPointReplicationSlots() before slotsync updates the slot. In such
cases, the remote restart_lsn may be stale and earlier than the current
redo pointer. To prevent relying on an outdated LSN, we use the oldest
WAL location available if it is greater than the remote restart_lsn.

This ensures that newly synced slots always start with a safe, non-stale
restart_lsn and are not invalidated by concurrent checkpoints.

Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Davydov <v.davydov@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 17
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TY4PR01MB16907E744589B1AB2EE89A31F94D7A%40TY4PR01MB16907.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
2026-01-27 05:49:23 +00:00
Dean Rasheed
c5fc17ddac Fix trigger transition table capture for MERGE in CTE queries.
When executing a data-modifying CTE query containing MERGE and some
other DML operation on a table with statement-level AFTER triggers,
the transition tables passed to the triggers would fail to include the
rows affected by the MERGE.

The reason is that, when initializing a ModifyTable node for MERGE,
MakeTransitionCaptureState() would create a TransitionCaptureState
structure with a single "tcs_private" field pointing to an
AfterTriggersTableData structure with cmdType == CMD_MERGE. Tuples
captured there would then not be included in the sets of tuples
captured when executing INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE ModifyTable nodes in the
same query.

Since there are no MERGE triggers, we should only create
AfterTriggersTableData structures for INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE. Individual
MERGE actions should then use those, thereby sharing the same capture
tuplestores as any other DML commands executed in the same query.

This requires changing the TransitionCaptureState structure, replacing
"tcs_private" with 3 separate pointers to AfterTriggersTableData
structures, one for each of INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE. Nominally,
this is an ABI break to a public structure in commands/trigger.h.
However, since this is a private field pointing to an opaque data
structure, the only way to create a valid TransitionCaptureState is by
calling MakeTransitionCaptureState(), and no extensions appear to be
doing that anyway, so it seems safe for back-patching.

Backpatch to v15, where MERGE was introduced.

Bug: #19380
Reported-by: Daniel Woelfel <dwwoelfel@gmail.com>
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19380-4e293be2b4007248%40postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 15
2026-01-24 11:30:49 +00:00
Tom Lane
3fabfc6595 Remove faulty Assert in partitioned INSERT...ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE.
Commit f16241bef mistakenly supposed that INSERT...ON CONFLICT DO
UPDATE rejects partitioned target tables.  (This may have been
accurate when the patch was written, but it was already obsolete
when committed.)  Hence, there's an assertion that we can't see
ItemPointerIndicatesMovedPartitions() in that path, but the assertion
is triggerable.

Some other places throw error if they see a moved-across-partitions
tuple, but there seems no need for that here, because if we just retry
then we get the same behavior as in the update-within-partition case,
as demonstrated by the new isolation test.  So fix by deleting the
faulty Assert.  (The fact that this is the fix doubtless explains
why we've heard no field complaints: the behavior of a non-assert
build is fine.)

The TM_Deleted case contains a cargo-culted copy of the same Assert,
which I also deleted to avoid confusion, although I believe that one
is actually not triggerable.

Per our code coverage report, neither the TM_Updated nor the
TM_Deleted case were reached at all by existing tests, so this
patch adds tests for both.

Reported-by: Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru>
Author: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f5fffe4b-11b2-4557-a864-3587ff9b4c36@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 14
2026-01-22 18:35:31 -05:00
Heikki Linnakangas
6ad01b1152 Fix crash in test function on removable_cutoff(NULL)
The function is part of the injection_points test module and only used
in tests. None of the current tests call it with a NULL argument, but
it is supposed to work.

Backpatch-through: 17
2026-01-16 14:43:38 +02:00
Fujii Masao
358784645e Add TAP test for GUC settings passed via CONNECTION in logical replication.
Commit d926462d81 restored the behavior of passing GUC settings from
the CONNECTION string to the publisher's walsender, allowing per-connection
configuration.

This commit adds a TAP test to verify that behavior works correctly.

Since commit d926462d81 was recently applied and backpatched to v15,
this follow-up commit is also backpatched accordingly.

Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwGYV+-abbKwdrM2UHUe-JYOFWmsrs6=QicyJO-j+-Widw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
2026-01-06 11:58:00 +09:00
Thomas Munro
b3c8119e28 Fix Mkvcbuild.pm builds of test_cloexec.c.
Mkvcbuild.pm scrapes Makefile contents, but couldn't understand the
change made by commit bec2a0aa.  Revealed by BF animal hamerkop in
branch REL_16_STABLE.

1.  It used += instead of =, which didn't match the pattern that
Mkvcbuild.pm looks for.  Drop the +.

2.  Mkvcbuild.pm doesn't link PROGRAM executables with libpgport.  Apply
a local workaround to REL_16_STABLE only (later branches dropped
Mkvcbuild.pm).

Backpatch-through: 16
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/175163.1766357334%40sss.pgh.pa.us
2025-12-29 15:28:17 +13:00
Amit Kapila
0ed8f1afb1 Don't advance origin during apply failure.
The logical replication parallel apply worker could incorrectly advance
the origin progress during an error or failed apply. This behavior risks
transaction loss because such transactions will not be resent by the
server.

Commit 3f28b2fcac addressed a similar issue for both the apply worker and
the table sync worker by registering a before_shmem_exit callback to reset
origin information. This prevents the worker from advancing the origin
during transaction abortion on shutdown. This patch applies the same fix
to the parallel apply worker, ensuring consistent behavior across all
worker types.

As with 3f28b2fcac, we are backpatching through version 16, since parallel
apply mode was introduced there and the issue only occurs when changes are
applied before the transaction end record (COMMIT or ABORT) is received.

Author: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 16
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TY4PR01MB169078771FB31B395AB496A6B94B4A@TY4PR01MB16907.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYAPR01MB5692FAC23BE40C69DA8ED4AFF5B92@TYAPR01MB5692.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
2025-12-24 04:05:06 +00:00
Heikki Linnakangas
bb87d7fef1 Fix bug in following update chain when locking a heap tuple
After waiting for a concurrent updater to finish, heap_lock_tuple()
followed the update chain to lock all tuple versions. However, when
stepping from the initial tuple to the next one, it failed to check
that the next tuple's XMIN matches the initial tuple's XMAX. That's an
important check whenever following an update chain, and the recursive
part that follows the chain did it, but the initial step missed it.
Without the check, if the updating transaction aborts, the updated
tuple is vacuumed away and replaced by an unrelated tuple, the
unrelated tuple might get incorrectly locked.

Author: Jasper Smit <jasper.smit@servicenow.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOG+RQ74x0q=kgBBQ=mezuvOeZBfSxM1qu_o0V28bwDz3dHxLw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
2025-12-23 13:37:25 +02:00
Tom Lane
4c9f262ba8 Add missing .gitignore for src/test/modules/test_cloexec. 2025-12-23 15:00:13 +09:00
Michael Paquier
e063ccc722 Fix orphaned origin in shared memory after DROP SUBSCRIPTION
Since ce0fdbfe97, a replication slot and an origin are created by each
tablesync worker, whose information is stored in both a catalog and
shared memory (once the origin is set up in the latter case).  The
transaction where the origin is created is the same as the one that runs
the initial COPY, with the catalog state of the origin becoming visible
for other sessions only once the COPY transaction has committed.  The
catalog state is coupled with a state in shared memory, initialized at
the same time as the origin created in the catalogs.  Note that the
transaction doing the initial data sync can take a long time, time that
depends on the amount of data to transfer from a publication node to its
subscriber node.

Now, when a DROP SUBSCRIPTION is executed, all its workers are stopped
with the origins removed.  The removal of each origin relies on a
catalog lookup.  A worker still running the initial COPY would fail its
transaction, with the catalog state of the origin rolled back while the
shared memory state remains around.  The session running the DROP
SUBSCRIPTION should be in charge of cleaning up the catalog and the
shared memory state, but as there is no data in the catalogs the shared
memory state is not removed.  This issue would leave orphaned origin
data in shared memory, leading to a confusing state as it would still
show up in pg_replication_origin_status.  Note that this shared memory
data is sticky, being flushed on disk in replorigin_checkpoint at
checkpoint.  This prevents other origins from reusing a slot position
in the shared memory data.

To address this problem, the commit moves the creation of the origin at
the end of the transaction that precedes the one executing the initial
COPY, making the origin immediately visible in the catalogs for other
sessions, giving DROP SUBSCRIPTION a way to know about it.  A different
solution would have been to clean up the shared memory state using an
abort callback within the tablesync worker.  The solution of this commit
is more consistent with the apply worker that creates an origin in a
short transaction.

A test is added in the subscription test 004_sync.pl, which was able to
display the problem.  The test fails when this commit is reverted.

Reported-by: Tenglong Gu <brucegu@amazon.com>
Reported-by: Daisuke Higuchi <higudai@amazon.com>
Analyzed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Author: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aUTekQTg4OYnw-Co@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 14
2025-12-23 14:32:21 +09:00
Thomas Munro
0451859131 Clean up test_cloexec.c and Makefile.
An unused variable caused a compiler warning on BF animal fairywren, an
snprintf() call was redundant, and some buffer sizes were inconsistent.
Per code review from Tom Lane.

The Makefile's test ifeq ($(PORTNAME), win32) never succeeded due to a
circularity, so only Meson builds were actually compiling the new test
code, partially explaining why CI didn't tell us about the warning
sooner (the other problem being that CompilerWarnings only makes
world-bin, a problem for another commit).  Simplify.

Backpatch-through: 16, like commit c507ba55
Author: Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Munro <tmunro@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1086088.1765593851%40sss.pgh.pa.us
2025-12-21 17:35:46 +13:00
Noah Misch
0f69beddea For inplace update, send nontransactional invalidations.
The inplace update survives ROLLBACK.  The inval didn't, so another
backend's DDL could then update the row without incorporating the
inplace update.  In the test this fixes, a mix of CREATE INDEX and ALTER
TABLE resulted in a table with an index, yet relhasindex=f.  That is a
source of index corruption.

Back-patch to v14 - v17.  This is a back-patch of commits:

- 243e9b40f1
  (main change, on master, before v18 branched)
- 0bada39c83
  (defect fix, on master, before v18 branched)
- bae8ca82fd
  (cosmetics from post-commit review, on REL_18_STABLE)

It reverses commit c1099dd745, my revert
of the original back-patch of 243e9b4.

This back-patch omits the non-comment heap_decode() changes.  I find
those changes removed harmless code that was last necessary in v13.  See
discussion thread for details.  The back branches aren't the place to
remove such code.

Like the original back-patch, this doesn't change WAL, because these
branches use end-of-recovery SIResetAll().  All branches change the ABI
of extern function PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple().  No PGXN extension
calls that, and there's no apparent use case in extensions.  Expect
".abi-compliance-history" edits to follow.

Reviewed-by: Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Surya Poondla <s_poondla@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilyasov Ian <ianilyasov@outlook.com>
Reviewed-by: Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani@google.com> (in earlier versions)
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> (in earlier versions)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240523000548.58.nmisch@google.com
Backpatch-through: 14-17
2025-12-16 16:13:54 -08:00
Heikki Linnakangas
807b2f261d Fix bogus extra arguments to query_safe in test
The test seemed to incorrectly think that query_safe() takes an
argument that describes what the query does, similar to e.g.
command_ok(). Until commit bd8d9c9bdf the extra arguments were
harmless and were just ignored, but when commit bd8d9c9bdf introduced
a new optional argument to query_safe(), the extra arguments started
clashing with that, causing the test to fail.

Backpatch to v17, that's the oldest branch where the test exists. The
extra arguments didn't cause any trouble on the older branches, but
they were clearly bogus anyway.
2025-12-10 19:39:00 +02:00
Michael Paquier
d0518e965e Fix failures with cross-version pg_upgrade tests
Buildfarm members skimmer and crake have reported that pg_upgrade
running from v18 fails due to the changes of d52c24b0f8, with the
expectations that the objects removed in the test module
injection_points should still be present post upgrades, but the test
module does not have them anymore.

The origin of the issue is that the following test modules depend on
injection_points, but they do not drop the extension once the tests
finish, leaving its traces in the dumps used for the upgrades:
- gin, down to v17
- typcache, down to v18
- nbtree, HEAD-only
Test modules have no upgrade requirements, as they are used only for..
Tests, so there is no point in keeping them around.

An alternative solution would be to drop the databases created by these
modules in AdjustUpgrade.pm, but the solution of this commit to drop the
extension is simpler.  Note that there would be a catch if using a
solution based on AdjustUpgrade.pm as the database name used for the
test runs differs between configure and meson:
- configure relies on USE_MODULE_DB for the database name unicity, that
would build a database name based on the *first* entry of REGRESS, that
lists all the SQL tests.
- meson relies on a "name" field.

For example, for the test module "gin", the regression database is named
"regression_gin" under meson, while it is more complex for configure, as
of "contrib_regression_gin_incomplete_splits".  So a AdjustUpgrade.pm
would need a set of DROP DATABASE IF EXISTS to solve this issue, to cope
with each build system.

The failure has been caused by d52c24b0f8, and the problem can happen
with upgrade dumps from v17 and v18 to HEAD.  This problem is not
currently reachable in the back-branches, but it could be possible that
a future change in injection_points in stable branches invalidates this
theory, so this commit is applied down to v17 in the test modules that
matter.

Per discussion with Tom Lane and Heikki Linnakangas.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2899652.1765167313@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 17
2025-12-10 12:47:23 +09:00
Thomas Munro
f24af0e04c Fix O_CLOEXEC flag handling in Windows port.
PostgreSQL's src/port/open.c has always set bInheritHandle = TRUE
when opening files on Windows, making all file descriptors inheritable
by child processes.  This meant the O_CLOEXEC flag, added to many call
sites by commit 1da569ca1f (v16), was silently ignored.

The original commit included a comment suggesting that our open()
replacement doesn't create inheritable handles, but it was a mis-
understanding of the code path.  In practice, the code was creating
inheritable handles in all cases.

This hasn't caused widespread problems because most child processes
(archive_command, COPY PROGRAM, etc.) operate on file paths passed as
arguments rather than inherited file descriptors.  Even if a child
wanted to use an inherited handle, it would need to learn the numeric
handle value, which isn't passed through our IPC mechanisms.

Nonetheless, the current behavior is wrong.  It violates documented
O_CLOEXEC semantics, contradicts our own code comments, and makes
PostgreSQL behave differently on Windows than on Unix.  It also creates
potential issues with future code or security auditing tools.

To fix, define O_CLOEXEC to _O_NOINHERIT in master, previously used by
O_DSYNC.  We use different values in the back branches to preserve
existing values.  In pgwin32_open_handle() we set bInheritHandle
according to whether O_CLOEXEC is specified, for the same atomic
semantics as POSIX in multi-threaded programs that create processes.

Backpatch-through: 16
Author: Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> (minor adjustments)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e2b16375-7430-4053-bda3-5d2194ff1880%40gmail.com
2025-12-10 09:10:31 +13:00
Michael Paquier
9d4f6d17f5 Show version of nodes in output of TAP tests
This commit adds the version information of a node initialized by
Cluster.pm, that may vary depending on the install_path given by the
test.  The code was written so as the node information, that includes
the version number, was dumped before the version number was set.

This is particularly useful for the pg_upgrade TAP tests, that may mix
several versions for cross-version runs.  The TAP infrastructure also
allows mixing nodes with different versions, so this information can be
useful for out-of-core tests.

Backpatch down to v15, where Cluster.pm and the pg_upgrade TAP tests
have been introduced.

Author: Potapov Alexander <a.potapov@postgrespro.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e59bb-692c0a80-5-6f987180@170377126
Backpatch-through: 15
2025-12-05 09:21:18 +09:00
Dean Rasheed
c090965036 Avoid rewriting data-modifying CTEs more than once.
Formerly, when updating an auto-updatable view, or a relation with
rules, if the original query had any data-modifying CTEs, the rewriter
would rewrite those CTEs multiple times as RewriteQuery() recursed
into the product queries. In most cases that was harmless, because
RewriteQuery() is mostly idempotent. However, if the CTE involved
updating an always-generated column, it would trigger an error because
any subsequent rewrite would appear to be attempting to assign a
non-default value to the always-generated column.

This could perhaps be fixed by attempting to make RewriteQuery() fully
idempotent, but that looks quite tricky to achieve, and would probably
be quite fragile, given that more generated-column-type features might
be added in the future.

Instead, fix by arranging for RewriteQuery() to rewrite each CTE
exactly once (by tracking the number of CTEs already rewritten as it
recurses). This has the advantage of being simpler and more efficient,
but it does make RewriteQuery() dependent on the order in which
rewriteRuleAction() joins the CTE lists from the original query and
the rule action, so care must be taken if that is ever changed.

Reported-by: Bernice Southey <bernice.southey@gmail.com>
Author: Bernice Southey <bernice.southey@gmail.com>
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEDh4nyD6MSH9bROhsOsuTqGAv_QceU_GDvN9WcHLtZTCYM1kA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
2025-11-29 12:32:12 +00:00
Tom Lane
e79b276621 Allow indexscans on partial hash indexes with implied quals.
Normally, if a WHERE clause is implied by the predicate of a partial
index, we drop that clause from the set of quals used with the index,
since it's redundant to test it if we're scanning that index.
However, if it's a hash index (or any !amoptionalkey index), this
could result in dropping all available quals for the index's first
key, preventing us from generating an indexscan.

It's fair to question the practical usefulness of this case.  Since
hash only supports equality quals, the situation could only arise
if the index's predicate is "WHERE indexkey = constant", implying
that the index contains only one hash value, which would make hash
a really poor choice of index type.  However, perhaps there are
other !amoptionalkey index AMs out there with which such cases are
more plausible.

To fix, just don't filter the candidate indexquals this way if
the index is !amoptionalkey.  That's a bit hokey because it may
result in testing quals we didn't need to test, but to do it
more accurately we'd have to redundantly identify which candidate
quals are actually usable with the index, something we don't know
at this early stage of planning.  Doesn't seem worth the effort.

Reported-by: Sergei Glukhov <s.glukhov@postgrespro.ru>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e200bf38-6b45-446a-83fd-48617211feff@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 14
2025-11-27 13:09:59 -05:00
Amit Langote
b5511fed50 Fix error reporting for SQL/JSON path type mismatches
transformJsonFuncExpr() used exprType()/exprLocation() on the
possibly coerced path expression, which could be NULL when
coercion to jsonpath failed, leading to "cache lookup failed
for type 0" errors.

Preserve the original expression node so that type and location
in the "must be of type jsonpath" error are reported correctly.
Add regression tests to cover these cases.

Reported-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHunVg81JMuNo8Yvv_hJD0DicgaVN2Wteu8aJbVJPBjZA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
2025-11-27 11:59:36 +09:00
Tom Lane
075a763e2d Don't allow CTEs to determine semantic levels of aggregates.
The fix for bug #19055 (commit b0cc0a71e) allowed CTE references in
sub-selects within aggregate functions to affect the semantic levels
assigned to such aggregates.  It turns out this broke some related
cases, leading to assertion failures or strange planner errors such
as "unexpected outer reference in CTE query".  After experimenting
with some alternative rules for assigning the semantic level in
such cases, we've come to the conclusion that changing the level
is more likely to break things than be helpful.

Therefore, this patch undoes what b0cc0a71e changed, and instead
installs logic to throw an error if there is any reference to a
CTE that's below the semantic level that standard SQL rules would
assign to the aggregate based on its contained Var and Aggref nodes.
(The SQL standard disallows sub-selects within aggregate functions,
so it can't reach the troublesome case and hence has no rule for
what to do.)

Perhaps someone will come along with a legitimate query that this
logic rejects, and if so probably the example will help us craft
a level-adjustment rule that works better than what b0cc0a71e did.
I'm not holding my breath for that though, because the previous
logic had been there for a very long time before bug #19055 without
complaints, and that bug report sure looks to have originated from
fuzzing not from real usage.

Like b0cc0a71e, back-patch to all supported branches, though
sadly that no longer includes v13.

Bug: #19106
Reported-by: Kamil Monicz <kamil@monicz.dev>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19106-9dd3668a0734cd72@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
2025-11-18 12:56:55 -05:00
Dean Rasheed
d6c415c4b4 Fix Assert failure in EXPLAIN ANALYZE MERGE with a concurrent update.
When instrumenting a MERGE command containing both WHEN NOT MATCHED BY
SOURCE and WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET actions using EXPLAIN ANALYZE, a
concurrent update of the target relation could lead to an Assert
failure in show_modifytable_info(). In a non-assert build, this would
lead to an incorrect value for "skipped" tuples in the EXPLAIN output,
rather than a crash.

This could happen if the concurrent update caused a matched row to no
longer match, in which case ExecMerge() treats the single originally
matched row as a pair of not matched rows, and potentially executes 2
not-matched actions for the single source row. This could then lead to
a state where the number of rows processed by the ModifyTable node
exceeds the number of rows produced by its source node, causing
"skipped_path" in show_modifytable_info() to be negative, triggering
the Assert.

Fix this in ExecMergeMatched() by incrementing the instrumentation
tuple count on the source node whenever a concurrent update of this
kind is detected, if both kinds of merge actions exist, so that the
number of source rows matches the number of actions potentially
executed, and the "skipped" tuple count is correct.

Back-patch to v17, where support for WHEN NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE
actions was introduced.

Bug: #19111
Reported-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19111-5b06624513d301b3@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 17
2025-11-16 22:15:45 +00:00
Heikki Linnakangas
d02c03ddc5 Fix bug where we truncated CLOG that was still needed by LISTEN/NOTIFY
The async notification queue contains the XID of the sender, and when
processing notifications we call TransactionIdDidCommit() on the
XID. But we had no safeguards to prevent the CLOG segments containing
those XIDs from being truncated away. As a result, if a backend didn't
for some reason process its notifications for a long time, or when a
new backend issued LISTEN, you could get an error like:

test=# listen c21;
ERROR:  58P01: could not access status of transaction 14279685
DETAIL:  Could not open file "pg_xact/000D": No such file or directory.
LOCATION:  SlruReportIOError, slru.c:1087

To fix, make VACUUM "freeze" the XIDs in the async notification queue
before truncating the CLOG. Old XIDs are replaced with
FrozenTransactionId or InvalidTransactionId.

Note: This commit is not a full fix. A race condition remains, where a
backend is executing asyncQueueReadAllNotifications() and has just
made a local copy of an async SLRU page which contains old XIDs, while
vacuum concurrently truncates the CLOG covering those XIDs. When the
backend then calls TransactionIdDidCommit() on those XIDs from the
local copy, you still get the error. The next commit will fix that
remaining race condition.

This was first reported by Sergey Zhuravlev in 2021, with many other
people hitting the same issue later. Thanks to:
- Alexandra Wang, Daniil Davydov, Andrei Varashen and Jacques Combrink
  for investigating and providing reproducable test cases,
- Matheus Alcantara and Arseniy Mukhin for review and earlier proposed
  patches to fix this,
- Álvaro Herrera and Masahiko Sawada for reviews,
- Yura Sokolov aka funny-falcon for the idea of marking transactions
  as committed in the notification queue, and
- Joel Jacobson for the final patch version. I hope I didn't forget
  anyone.

Backpatch to all supported versions. I believe the bug goes back all
the way to commit d1e027221d, which introduced the SLRU-based async
notification queue.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16961-25f29f95b3604a8a@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18804-bccbbde5e77a68c2@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAK98qZ3wZLE-RZJN_Y%2BTFjiTRPPFPBwNBpBi5K5CU8hUHkzDpw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
2025-11-12 21:01:13 +02:00
Nathan Bossart
e2fb3dfa81 Check for CREATE privilege on the schema in CREATE STATISTICS.
This omission allowed table owners to create statistics in any
schema, potentially leading to unexpected naming conflicts.  For
ALTER TABLE commands that require re-creating statistics objects,
skip this check in case the user has since lost CREATE on the
schema.  The addition of a second parameter to CreateStatistics()
breaks ABI compatibility, but we are unaware of any impacted
third-party code.

Reported-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Co-authored-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Security: CVE-2025-12817
Backpatch-through: 13
2025-11-10 09:00:00 -06:00
Peter Eisentraut
07f787e573 Disallow generated columns in COPY WHERE clause
Stored generated columns are not yet computed when the filtering
happens, so we need to prohibit them to avoid incorrect behavior.

Co-authored-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACJufxHb8YPQ095R_pYDr77W9XKNaXg5Rzy-WP525mkq+hRM3g@mail.gmail.com
2025-11-06 14:01:42 +01:00
Michael Paquier
1dad5594c1 Fix timing-dependent failure in recovery test 004_timeline_switch
The test introduced by 17b2d5ec75 verifies that a WAL receiver
survives across a timeline jump by searching the server logs for
termination messages.  However, it called restart() before the timeline
switch, which kills the WAL receiver and may log the exact message being
checked, hence failing the test.  As TAP tests reuse the same log file
across restarts, a rotate_logfile() is used before the restart so as the
log matching check is not impacted by log entries generated by a
previous shutdown.

Recent changes to file handle inheritance altered I/O timing enough to
make this fail consistently while testing another patch.

While on it, this adds an extra check based on a PID comparison.  This
test may lead to false positives as it could be possible that the WAL
receiver has processed a timeline jump before the initial PID is
grabbed, but it should be good enough in most cases.

Like 17b2d5ec75, backpatch down to v13.

Author: Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9d00b597-d64a-4f1e-802e-90f9dc394c70@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
2025-11-05 16:48:24 +09:00
Andres Freund
0f8a2b1336 Backpatch: Fix warnings about declaration of environ on MinGW
Backpatch commit 7bc9a8bdd2 to 13-17. The motivation for backpatching is that
we want to update CI to Debian Trixie. Trixie contains a newer mingw
installation, which would trigger the warning addressed by 7bc9a8bdd2. The
risk of backpatching seems fairly low, given that it did not cause issues in
the branches the commit is already present.

While CI is not present in 13-14, it seems better to be consistent across
branches.

Author: Thomas Munro <tmunro@postgresql.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/o5yadhhmyjo53svzwvaocww6zkrp63i4f32cw3treuh46pxtza@hyqio5b2tkt6
Backpatch-through: 13
2025-11-04 13:24:57 -05:00
Peter Eisentraut
0b44f2443f Tighten check for generated column in partition key expression
A generated column may end up being part of the partition key
expression, if it's specified as an expression e.g. "(<generated
column name>)" or if the partition key expression contains a whole-row
reference, even though we do not allow a generated column to be part
of partition key expression.  Fix this hole.

Co-authored-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACJufxF%3DWDGthXSAQr9thYUsfx_1_t9E6N8tE3B8EqXcVoVfQw%40mail.gmail.com
2025-11-04 15:18:09 +01:00
Álvaro Herrera
f4b68b0336
BRIN autosummarization may need a snapshot
It's possible to define BRIN indexes on functions that require a
snapshot to run, but the autosummarization feature introduced by commit
7526e10224 fails to provide one.  This causes autovacuum to leave a
BRIN placeholder tuple behind after a failed work-item execution, making
such indexes less efficient.  Repair by obtaining a snapshot prior to
running the task, and add a test to verify this behavior.

Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reported-by: Giovanni Fabris <giovanni.fabris@icon.it>
Reported-by: Arthur Nascimento <tureba@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202511031106.h4fwyuyui6fz@alvherre.pgsql
2025-11-04 13:23:26 +01:00
Peter Eisentraut
1e6dfdaa04 Error message stylistic correction
Fixup for commit ef5e60a9d3: The inconsistent use of articles was a
bit awkward.
2025-11-04 12:25:20 +01:00
Michael Paquier
e7340b484c Fix unconditional WAL receiver shutdown during stream-archive transition
Commit b4f584f9d2 (affecting v15~, later backpatched down to 13 as of
3635a0a35a) introduced an unconditional WAL receiver shutdown when
switching from streaming to archive WAL sources.  This causes problems
during a timeline switch, when a WAL receiver enters WALRCV_WAITING
state but remains alive, waiting for instructions.

The unconditional shutdown can break some monitoring scenarios as the
WAL receiver gets repeatedly terminated and re-spawned, causing
pg_stat_wal_receiver.status to show a "streaming" instead of "waiting"
status, masking the fact that the WAL receiver is waiting for a new TLI
and a new LSN to be able to continue streaming.

This commit changes the WAL receiver behavior so as the shutdown becomes
conditional, with InstallXLogFileSegmentActive being always reset to
prevent the regression fixed by b4f584f9d2: only terminate the WAL
receiver when it is actively streaming (WALRCV_STREAMING,
WALRCV_STARTING, or WALRCV_RESTARTING).  When in WALRCV_WAITING state,
just reset InstallXLogFileSegmentActive flag to allow archive
restoration without killing the process.  WALRCV_STOPPED and
WALRCV_STOPPING are not reachable states in this code path.  For the
latter, the startup process is the one in charge of setting
WALRCV_STOPPING via ShutdownWalRcv(), waiting for the WAL receiver to
reach a WALRCV_STOPPED state after switching walRcvState, so
WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable() cannot be reached while a WAL receiver is
in a WALRCV_STOPPING state.

A regression test is added to check that a WAL receiver is not stopped
on timeline jump, that fails when the fix of this commit is reverted.

Reported-by: Ryan Bird <ryanzxg@gmail.com>
Author: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19093-c4fff49a608f82a0@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
2025-11-04 10:52:35 +09:00
Amit Kapila
0024f5a102 Fix GUC check_hook validation for synchronized_standby_slots.
Previously, the check_hook for synchronized_standby_slots attempted to
validate that each specified slot existed and was physical. However, these
checks were not performed during server startup. As a result, if users
configured non-existent slots before startup, the misconfiguration would
go undetected initially. This could later cause parallel query failures,
as newly launched workers would detect the issue and raise an ERROR.

This patch improves the check_hook by validating the syntax and format of
slot names. Validation of slot existence and type is deferred to the WAL
sender process, aligning with the behavior of the check_hook for
primary_slot_name.

Reported-by: Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com>
Author: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 17, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5-nLCeO4MQzWipCXH58qf0arruiw0OeUc1+Q=Z=4GM+=v1NQ@mail.gmail.com
2025-10-27 06:34:29 +00:00
David Rowley
0d30746153 Fix incorrect logic for caching ResultRelInfos for triggers
When dealing with ResultRelInfos for partitions, there are cases where
there are mixed requirements for the ri_RootResultRelInfo.  There are
cases when the partition itself requires a NULL ri_RootResultRelInfo and
in the same query, the same partition may require a ResultRelInfo with
its parent set in ri_RootResultRelInfo.  This could cause the column
mapping between the partitioned table and the partition not to be done
which could result in crashes if the column attnums didn't match
exactly.

The fix is simple.  We now check that the ri_RootResultRelInfo matches
what the caller passed to ExecGetTriggerResultRel() and only return a
cached ResultRelInfo when the ri_RootResultRelInfo matches what the
caller wants, otherwise we'll make a new one.

Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Fomin <fomin.list@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7DCE78D7-0520-4207-822B-92F60AEA14B4@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
2025-10-26 11:01:53 +13:00
Masahiko Sawada
9310be78ae Add copyright notice to vacuum_horizon_floor.pl test.
Fix oversight in commit 303ba0573, which was backpatched through 14.

Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBeFdTJcwUfUYPcEgONab3TS6i1PB9S5cSXcBAmdAdQKw%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
2025-10-22 17:17:43 -07:00
Tom Lane
2fa8f94db1 Fix thinko in commit 7d129ba54.
The revised logic in 001_ssltests.pl would fail if openssl
doesn't work or if Perl is a 32-bit build, because it had
already overwritten $serialno with something inappropriate
to use in the eventual match.  We could go back to the
previous code layout, but it seems best to introduce a
separate variable for the output of openssl.

Per failure on buildfarm member mamba, which has a 32-bit Perl.
2025-10-20 08:45:57 -04:00
Álvaro Herrera
c945b06d5f
Fix determination of not-null constraint "locality" for inherited columns
It is possible to have a non-inherited not-null constraint on an
inherited column, but we were failing to preserve such constraints
during pg_upgrade where the source is 17 or older, because of a bug in
the pg_dump query for it.  Oversight in commit 14e87ffa5c.  Fix that
query.  In passing, touch-up a bogus nearby comment introduced by the
same commit.

In version 17, make the regression tests leave a table in this
situation, so that this scenario is tested in the cross-version upgrade
tests of 18 and up.

Author: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Andrew Bille <andrewbille@gmail.com>
Bug: #19074
Backpatch-through: 18
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19074-ae2548458cf0195c@postgresql.org
2025-10-18 18:18:19 +02:00
Daniel Gustafsson
f01c4eb4e9 Avoid warnings in tests when openssl binary isn't available
The SSL tests for pg_stat_ssl tries to exactly match the serial
from the certificate by extracting it with the openssl binary.
If that fails due to the binary not being available, a fallback
match is used, but the attempt to execute a missing binary adds
a warning to the output which can confuse readers for a failure
in the test.  Fix by only attempting if the openssl binary was
found by autoconf/meson.

Backpatch down to v16 where commit c8e4030d1b made the test
use the OPENSSL variable from autoconf/meson instead of a hard-
coded value.

Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reported-by: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aNPSp1-RIAs3skZm@msg.df7cb.de
Backpatch-through: 16
2025-10-17 14:21:26 +02:00
Michael Paquier
61b5fa029a Fix matching check in recovery test 042_low_level_backup
042_low_level_backup compared the result of a query two times with a
comparison operator based on an integer, while the result should be
compared with a string.

The outcome of the tests is currently not impacted by this change.
However, it could be possible that the tests fail to detect future
issues if the query results become different, for some reason.

Oversight in 99b4a63bef.

Author: Sadhuprasad Patro <b.sadhu@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFF0-CHhwNx_Cv2uy7tKjODUbeOgPrJpW4Rpf1jqB16_1bU2sg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
2025-10-17 13:06:11 +09:00
Álvaro Herrera
ea06f97eeb
Stop creating constraints during DETACH CONCURRENTLY
Commit 71f4c8c6f7 (which implemented DETACH CONCURRENTLY) added code
to create a separate table constraint when a table is detached
concurrently, identical to the partition constraint, on the theory that
such a constraint was needed in case the optimizer had constructed any
query plans that depended on the constraint being there.  However, that
theory was apparently bogus because any such plans would be invalidated.

For hash partitioning, those constraints are problematic, because their
expressions reference the OID of the parent partitioned table, to which
the detached table is no longer related; this causes all sorts of
problems (such as inability of restoring a pg_dump of that table, and
the table no longer working properly if the partitioned table is later
dropped).

We'd like to get rid of all those constraints.  In fact, for branch
master, do that -- no longer create any substitute constraints.
However, out of fear that some users might somehow depend on these
constraints for other partitioning strategies, for stable branches
(back to 14, which added DETACH CONCURRENTLY), only do it for hash
partitioning.

(If you repeatedly DETACH CONCURRENTLY and then ATTACH a partition, then
with this constraint addition you don't need to scan the table in the
ATTACH step, which presumably is good.  But if users really valued this
feature, they would have requested that it worked for non-concurrent
DETACH also.)

Author: Haiyang Li <mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com>
Reported-by: Fei Changhong <feichanghong@qq.com>
Reported-by: Haiyang Li <mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com>
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18371-7fef49f63de13f02@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19070-781326347ade7c57@postgresql.org
2025-10-11 20:30:12 +02:00
Amit Langote
09f86a42f2 Fix internal error from CollateExpr in SQL/JSON DEFAULT expressions
SQL/JSON functions such as JSON_VALUE could fail with "unrecognized
node type" errors when a DEFAULT clause contained an explicit COLLATE
expression. That happened because assign_collations_walker() could
invoke exprSetCollation() on a JsonBehavior expression whose DEFAULT
still contained a CollateExpr, which exprSetCollation() does not
handle.

For example:

  SELECT JSON_VALUE('{"a":1}', '$.c' RETURNING text
                    DEFAULT 'A' COLLATE "C" ON EMPTY);

Fix by validating in transformJsonBehavior() that the DEFAULT
expression's collation matches the enclosing JSON expression’s
collation. In exprSetCollation(), replace the recursive call on the
JsonBehavior expression with an assertion that its collation already
matches the target, since the parser now enforces that condition.

Reported-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHVwYYSyiVQ6o+PsRX6zQ7rAFinh_fv1kCfTsT1xG4Zeg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
2025-10-09 01:07:36 -04:00
Jacob Champion
c335775908 test_json_parser: Speed up 002_inline.pl
Some macOS machines are having trouble with 002_inline, which executes
the JSON parser test executables hundreds of times in a nested loop.
Both developer machines and buildfarm critters have shown excessive test
durations, upwards of 20 seconds.

Push the innermost loop of 002_inline, which iterates through differing
chunk sizes, down into the test executable. (I'd eventually like to push
all of the JSON unit tests down into C, but this is an easy win in the
short term.) Testers have reported a speedup between 4-9x.

Reported-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Tested-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Tested-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tested-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BTgmobKoG%2BgKzH9qB7uE4MFo-z1hn7UngqAe9b0UqNbn3_XGQ%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
2025-10-01 09:25:21 -07:00
Noah Misch
6778fbca63 Fix StatisticsObjIsVisibleExt() for pg_temp.
Neighbor get_statistics_object_oid() ignores objects in pg_temp, as has
been the standard for non-relation, non-type namespace searches since
CVE-2007-2138.  Hence, most operations that name a statistics object
correctly decline to map an unqualified name to a statistics object in
pg_temp.  StatisticsObjIsVisibleExt() did not.  Consequently,
pg_statistics_obj_is_visible() wrongly returned true for such objects,
psql \dX wrongly listed them, and getObjectDescription()-based ereport()
and pg_describe_object() wrongly omitted namespace qualification.  Any
malfunction beyond that would depend on how a human or application acts
on those wrong indications.  Commit
d99d58cdc8 introduced this.  Back-patch to
v13 (all supported versions).

Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20250920162116.2e.nmisch@google.com
Backpatch-through: 13
2025-09-29 11:15:48 -07:00
Tom Lane
b4ef835f5e Add minimal sleep to stats isolation test functions.
The functions test_stat_func() and test_stat_func2() had empty
function bodies, so that they took very little time to run.  This made
it possible that on machines with relatively low timer resolution the
functions could return before the clock advanced, making the test fail
(as seen on buildfarm members fruitcrow and hamerkop).

To avoid that, pg_sleep for 10us during the functions.  As far as we
can tell, all current hardware has clock resolution much less than
that.  (The current implementation of pg_sleep will round it up to
1ms anyway, but someday that might get improved.)

Author: Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/68d413a3.a70a0220.24c74c.8be9@mx.google.com
Backpatch-through: 15
2025-09-25 13:29:02 -04:00
Tom Lane
e830896c16 Calculate agglevelsup correctly when Aggref contains a CTE.
If an aggregate function call contains a sub-select that has
an RTE referencing a CTE outside the aggregate, we must treat
that reference like a Var referencing the CTE's query level
for purposes of determining the aggregate's level.  Otherwise
we might reach the nonsensical conclusion that the aggregate
should be evaluated at some query level higher than the CTE,
ending in a planner error or a broken plan tree that causes
executor failures.

Bug: #19055
Reported-by: BugForge <dllggyx@outlook.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19055-6970cfa8556a394d@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
2025-09-17 16:32:57 -04:00
David Rowley
0fb06e8933 Add missing EPQ recheck for TID Range Scan
The EvalPlanQual recheck for TID Range Scan wasn't rechecking the TID qual
still passed after following update chains.  This could result in tuples
being updated or deleted by plans using TID Range Scans where the ctid of
the new (updated) tuple no longer matches the clause of the scan.  This
isn't desired behavior, and isn't consistent with what would happen if the
chosen plan had used an Index or Seq Scan, and that could lead to hard to
predict behavior for scans that contain TID quals and other quals as the
planner has freedom to choose TID Range or some other non-TID scan method
for such queries, and the chosen plan could change at any moment.

Here we fix this by properly implementing the recheck function for TID
Range Scans.

Backpatch to 14, where TID Range Scans were added

Reported-by: Sophie Alpert <pg@sophiebits.com>
Author: Sophie Alpert <pg@sophiebits.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4a6268ff-3340-453a-9bf5-c98d51a6f729@app.fastmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
2025-09-17 12:20:19 +12:00
David Rowley
3d939a9b1c Add missing EPQ recheck for TID Scan
The EvalPlanQual recheck for TID Scan wasn't rechecking the TID qual
still passed after following update chains.  This could result in tuples
being updated or deleted by plans using TID Scans where the ctid of the
new (updated) tuple no longer matches the clause of the scan.  This isn't
desired behavior, and isn't consistent with what would happen if the
chosen plan had used an Index or Seq Scan, and that could lead to hard to
predict behavior for scans that contain TID quals and other quals as the
planner has freedom to choose TID or some other scan method for such
queries, and the chosen plan could change at any moment.

Here we fix this by properly implementing the recheck function for TID
Scans.

Backpatch to 13, oldest supported version

Reported-by: Sophie Alpert <pg@sophiebits.com>
Author: Sophie Alpert <pg@sophiebits.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4a6268ff-3340-453a-9bf5-c98d51a6f729@app.fastmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
2025-09-17 11:49:49 +12:00
Tom Lane
a865b654c7 Add regression expected-files for older OpenSSL in FIPS mode.
In our previous discussions around making our regression tests
pass in FIPS mode, we concluded that we didn't need to support
the different error message wording observed with pre-3.0 OpenSSL.
However there are still a few LTS distributions soldiering along
with such versions, and now we have some in the buildfarm.
So let's add the variant expected-files needed to make them happy.

This commit only covers the core regression tests.  Previous
discussion suggested that we might need some adjustments in
contrib as well, but it's not totally clear to me what those
would be.  Rather than work it out from first principles,
I'll wait to see what the buildfarm shows.

Back-patch to v17 which is the oldest branch that claims
to support this case.

Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/443709.1757876535@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 17
2025-09-16 10:09:49 -04:00
Richard Guo
d719e2ecb1 Treat JsonConstructorExpr as non-strict
JsonConstructorExpr can produce non-NULL output with a NULL input, so
it should be treated as a non-strict construct.  Failing to do so can
lead to incorrect query behavior.

For example, in the reported case, when pulling up a subquery that is
under an outer join, if the subquery's target list contains a
JsonConstructorExpr that uses subquery variables and it is mistakenly
treated as strict, it will be pulled up without being wrapped in a
PlaceHolderVar.  As a result, the expression will be evaluated at the
wrong place and will not be forced to null when the outer join should
do so.

Back-patch to v16 where JsonConstructorExpr was introduced.

Bug: #19046
Reported-by: Runyuan He <runyuan@berkeley.edu>
Author: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19046-765b6602b0a8cfdf@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 16
2025-09-16 18:45:26 +09:00
Peter Eisentraut
f9b41f3e1e CREATE STATISTICS: improve misleading error message
The previous change (commit f225473cba) was still not on target,
because it talked about relation kinds, which are not what is being
checked here.  Provide a more accurate message.

Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxEZ48toGH0Em_6vdsT57Y3L8pLF=DZCQ_gCii6=C3MeXw@mail.gmail.com
2025-09-15 11:48:03 +02:00
Tom Lane
e09adb5b9f Amend recent fix for SIMILAR TO regex conversion.
Commit e3ffc3e91 fixed the translation of character classes in
SIMILAR TO regular expressions.  Unfortunately the fix broke a corner
case: if there is an escape character right after the opening bracket
(for example in "[\q]"), a closing bracket right after the escape
sequence would not be seen as closing the character class.

There were two more oversights: a backslash or a nested opening bracket
right at the beginning of a character class should remove the special
meaning from any following caret or closing bracket.

This bug suggests that this code needs to be more readable, so also
rename the variables "charclass_depth" and "charclass_start" to
something more meaningful, rewrite an "if" cascade to be more
consistent, and improve the commentary.

Reported-by: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Stephan Springl <springl-psql@bfw-online.de>
Author: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFCRh-8NwJd0jq6P=R3qhHyqU7hw0BTor3W0SvUcii24et+zAw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
2025-09-13 16:55:51 -04:00