On FreeBSD, the new test fails due to a WAL file being removed before
the standby has had the chance to copy it. Fix by adding a replication
slot to prevent the removal until after the standby has connected.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2Wj5nau_qpjbwihvmXLfkAWOZ5TKdbnqOc6nKSiRJEoPyQ@mail.gmail.com
Crash recovery on standby may encounter missing directories
when replaying database-creation WAL records. Prior to this
patch, the standby would fail to recover in such a case;
however, the directories could be legitimately missing.
Consider the following sequence of commands:
CREATE DATABASE
DROP DATABASE
DROP TABLESPACE
If, after replaying the last WAL record and removing the
tablespace directory, the standby crashes and has to replay the
create database record again, crash recovery must be able to continue.
A fix for this problem was already attempted in 49d9cfc68b, but it
was reverted because of design issues. This new version is based
on Robert Haas' proposal: any missing tablespaces are created
during recovery before reaching consistency. Tablespaces
are created as real directories, and should be deleted
by later replay. CheckRecoveryConsistency ensures
they have disappeared.
The problems detected by this new code are reported as PANIC,
except when allow_in_place_tablespaces is set to ON, in which
case they are WARNING. Apart from making tests possible, this
gives users an escape hatch in case things don't go as planned.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Author: Asim R Praveen <apraveen@pivotal.io>
Author: Paul Guo <paulguo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav@gmail.com> (older versions)
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> (older versions)
Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Diagnosed-by: Paul Guo <paulguo@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEET0ZGx9AvioViLf7nbR_8tH9-=27DN5xWJ2P9-ROH16e4JUA@mail.gmail.com
Commit e2f65f425 added contrib/pg_prewarm to the prerequisites for
running the src/test/recovery suite, but did not bother to update
the documentation about that.
The dependency logic failed to register a column-level dependency
when a view or rule contains a reference to a specific column of
the result of a function-returning-composite. That meant you could
drop the column from the composite type, causing trouble for future
executions of the view. We've known about this for years, but never
summoned the energy to actually fix it, instead installing various
low-level defenses to prevent crashing on references to dropped columns.
We had to do that to plug the hole in stable branches, where there might
be pre-existing broken references; but let's fix the root cause today.
To do that, add some logic (borrowed from get_rte_attribute_is_dropped)
to find_expr_references_walker, to check whether a Var referencing an
RTE_FUNCTION RTE is referencing a column of a composite type, and if
so add the proper dependency.
However ... it seems mighty unwise to remove said low-level defenses,
since there could be other bugs now or in the future that allow
reaching them. By the same token, letting those defenses go untested
seems unwise. Hence, rather than just dropping the associated test
cases, hack them to continue working by the expedient of manually
dropping the pg_depend entries that this fix installs.
Back-patch into v15. I don't want to risk changing this behavior
in stable branches, but it seems not too late for v15. (Since
we have already forced initdb for beta3, we can be sure that all
production v15 installations will have these added dependencies.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/182492.1658431155@sss.pgh.pa.us
Due to lack of concern for the case in the dependency code, it's
possible to drop a column of a composite type even though stored
queries have references to the dropped column via functions-in-FROM
that return the composite type. There are "soft" references,
namely FROM-clause aliases for such columns, and "hard" references,
that is actual Vars referring to them. The right fix for hard
references is to add dependencies preventing the drop; something
we've known for many years and not done (and this commit still doesn't
address it). A "soft" reference shouldn't prevent a drop though.
We've been around on this before (cf. 9b35ddce9, 2c4debbd0), but
nobody had noticed that the current behavior can result in dump/reload
failures, because ruleutils.c can print more column aliases than the
underlying composite type now has. So we need to rejigger the
column-alias-handling code to treat such columns as dropped and not
print aliases for them.
Rather than writing new code for this, I used expandRTE() which already
knows how to figure out which function result columns are dropped.
I'd initially thought maybe we could use expandRTE() in all cases, but
that fails for EXPLAIN's purposes, because the planner strips a lot of
RTE infrastructure that expandRTE() needs. So this patch just uses it
for unplanned function RTEs and otherwise does things the old way.
If there is a hard reference (Var), then removing the column alias
causes us to fail to print the Var, since there's no longer a name
to print. Failing seems less desirable than printing a made-up
name, so I made it print "?dropped?column?" instead.
Per report from Timo Stolz. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5c91267e-3b6d-5795-189c-d15a55d61dbb@nullachtvierzehn.de
Detail and hint messages should be full sentences and should end with a
period, but some of the messages newly-introduced in v15 did not follow
that.
Author: Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220719120948.GF12702@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 15
We allow users to set the values of not-yet-loaded extension GUCs,
remembering those values in "placeholder" GUC entries. When/if
the extension is loaded later in the session, we need to verify that
the user had permissions to set the GUC. That was done correctly
before commit a0ffa885e, but as of that commit, we'd check the
permissions of the active role when the LOAD happens, not the role
that had set the value. (This'd be a security bug if it had made it
into a released version.)
In principle this is simple enough to fix: we just need to remember
the exact role OID that set each GUC value, and use that not
GetUserID() when verifying permissions. Maintaining that data in
the guc.c data structures is slightly tedious, but fortunately it's
all basically just copy-n-paste of the logic for tracking the
GucSource of each setting, as we were already doing.
Another oversight is that validate_option_array_item() hadn't
been taught to check for granted GUC privileges. This appears
to manifest only in that ALTER ROLE/DATABASE RESET ALL will
fail to reset settings that the user should be allowed to reset.
Patch by myself and Nathan Bossart, per report from Nathan Bossart.
Back-patch to v15 where the faulty code came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220706224727.GA2158260@nathanxps13
This addresses two issues in the tests of test_oat_hooks:
- The role regress_test_user was being left behind, preventing the test
to succeed on repeated runs. It makes sense to leave some objects
behind to have more coverage for pg_upgrade (as does test_pg_dump), but
the role dropped here does not own any objects so there is no reason to
keep it.
- GRANT SET ON PARAMETER is issued, creating an entry in
pg_parameter_acl without cleaning up the entry created. This causes
an overlap with unsafe_tests as both use work_mem, making the latter
fail. This commit adds an extra REVOKE SET ON PARAMETER to clean the
contents of pg_parameter_acl, switching to maintenance_work_mem rather
than work_mem to avoid an overlap between both tests.
The tests of test_oat_hooks cannot use installcheck yet as these are
proving to be unstable with caching and the namespace search hooks, so
the issues fixed here cannot be reached yet, but they would be once the
hook issue is addressed and installcheck is allowed again in
test_oat_hooks.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YrpVkADAY0knF6vM@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 15
These are documented to be the allowed types for the RETURNING clause,
but the restriction was not being enforced, which caused a segfault if
another type was specified. Add some testing for this.
Per report from a.kozhemyakin
Backpatch to release 15.
When locking a specific named relation for a FOR [KEY] UPDATE/SHARE
clause, transformLockingClause() finds the relation to lock by
scanning the rangetable for an RTE with a matching eref->aliasname.
However, it failed to account for the visibility rules of a join RTE.
If a join RTE doesn't have a user-supplied alias, it will have a
generated eref->aliasname of "unnamed_join" that is not visible as a
relation name in the parse namespace. Such an RTE needs to be skipped,
otherwise it might be found in preference to a regular base relation
with a user-supplied alias of "unnamed_join", preventing it from being
locked.
In addition, if a join RTE doesn't have a user-supplied alias, but
does have a join_using_alias, then the RTE needs to be matched using
that alias rather than the generated eref->aliasname, otherwise a
misleading "relation not found" error will be reported rather than a
"join cannot be locked" error.
Backpatch all the way, except for the second part which only goes back
to 14, where JOIN USING aliases were added.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUY_KOBnqxbTSPf=7fz9HWPnZ5Xgb9SwYzZ8rFXe7nb=w@mail.gmail.com
This reverts most of 91c0570a79, f28bf667f6, fe0972ee5e, afdeff1052. The
only thing left is the retry loop in 019_replslot_limit.pl that avoids
spurious failures by retrying a couple times.
We haven't seen any hard evidence that this is caused by anything but slow
process shutdown. We did not find any cases where walsenders did not vanish
after waiting for longer. Therefore there's no reason for this debugging code
to remain.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220530190155.47wr3x2prdwyciah@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 15-
We were going into IDLE state too soon when executing queries via
PQsendQuery in pipeline mode, causing several scenarios to misbehave in
different ways -- most notably, as reported by Daniele Varrazzo, that a
warning message is produced by libpq:
message type 0x33 arrived from server while idle
But it is also possible, if queries are sent and results consumed not in
lockstep, for the expected mediating NULL result values from PQgetResult
to be lost (a problem which has not been reported, but which is more
serious).
Fix this by introducing two new concepts: one is a command queue element
PGQUERY_CLOSE to tell libpq to wait for the CloseComplete server
response to the Close message that is sent by PQsendQuery. Because the
application is not expecting any PGresult from this, the mechanism to
consume it is a bit hackish.
The other concept, authored by Horiguchi-san, is a PGASYNC_PIPELINE_IDLE
state for libpq's state machine to differentiate "really idle" from
merely "the idle state that occurs in between reading results from the
server for elements in the pipeline". This makes libpq not go fully
IDLE when the libpq command queue contains entries; in normal cases, we
only go IDLE once at the end of the pipeline, when the server response
to the final SYNC message is received. (However, there are corner cases
it doesn't fix, such as terminating the query sequence by
PQsendFlushRequest instead of PQpipelineSync; this sort of scenario is
what requires PGQUERY_CLOSE bit above.)
This last bit helps make the libpq state machine clearer; in particular
we can get rid of an ugly hack in pqParseInput3 to avoid considering
IDLE as such when the command queue contains entries.
A new test mode is added to libpq_pipeline.c to tickle some related
problematic cases.
Reported-by: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+mi_8bvD0_CW3sumgwPvWdNzXY32itoG_16tDYRu_1S2gV2iw@mail.gmail.com
None of the other bison parsers contains this directive, and it gives
rise to some unfortunate and impenetrable messages, so just remove it.
Backpatch to release 12, where it was introduced.
Per gripe from Erik Rijkers
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ba069ce2-a98f-dc70-dc17-2ccf2a9bf7c7@xs4all.nl
The ssl test "IPv4 host with CIDR mask does not match" apparently has
a portability problem. Some operating systems don't reject the host
name specification "192.0.2.1/32" as an IP address, and that is then
later rejected when the SNI is set, which results in a different error
message that the test is supposed to verify.
The value of the test has been questioned in the discussion, and it
was suggested that removing it would be an acceptable fix, so that's
what this is doing.
Reported-by: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Bug: #17522
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/17522-bfcd5c603b5f4daa%40postgresql.org
The test was not waiting for the subscriber's data synchronization to
happen after refreshing the publication on the subscriber side. This leads
subscriber's apply worker to skip applying the changes on the
corresponding relation which results in a test failure.
Reported-by: Hou Zhijie, as per buildfarm
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716A69496A8E2F2E155DB8D94B59@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
072132f0 used the attnum offset to access the raw_fields array when
checking that the attribute names of the header and of the relation
match, leading to incorrect results or even crashes if the attribute
numbers of a relation are changed, like on a dropped attribute. This
fixes the logic to use the correct attribute names for the header
matching requirements.
Also, this commit disallows HEADER MATCH in COPY TO as there is no
validation that can be done in this case.
The tests are expanded for HEADER MATCH with COPY FROM and dropped
columns, with cases where a relation has a dropped and re-added column,
as well as a reduced set of columns.
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220607154744.vvmitnqhyxrne5ms@jrouhaud
In logical replication, we will check if the target table on the
subscriber is updatable by comparing the replica identity of the table on
the publisher with the table on the subscriber. When the target table is a
partitioned table, we only check its replica identity but not for the
partition tables. This leads to assertion failure while applying changes
for update/delete as we expect those to succeed only when the
corresponding partition table has a primary key or has a replica
identity defined.
Fix it by checking the replica identity of the partition table while
applying changes.
Reported-by: Shi Yu
Author: Shi Yu, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSZPR01MB6310F46CD425A967E4AEF736FDA49@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
This reverts commits 5753d4ee32 and fe60b67250 that modified HOT to
ignore BRIN indexes. The commit message for 5753d4ee32 claims that:
When determining whether an index update may be skipped by using
HOT, we can ignore attributes indexed only by BRIN indexes. There
are no index pointers to individual tuples in BRIN, and the page
range summary will be updated anyway as it relies on visibility
info.
This is partially incorrect - it's true BRIN indexes don't point to
individual tuples, so HOT chains are not an issue, but the visibitlity
info is not sufficient to keep the index up to date. This can easily
result in corrupted indexes, as demonstrated in the hackers thread.
This does not mean relaxing the HOT restrictions for BRIN is a lost
cause, but it needs to handle the two aspects (allowing HOT chains and
updating the page range summaries) as separate. But that requires a
major changes, and it's too late for that in the current dev cycle.
Reported-by: Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/05ebcb44-f383-86e3-4f31-0a97a55634cf@enterprisedb.com
We were not updating the partition map cache in the subscriber even when
the corresponding remote rel is changed. Due to this data was getting
incorrectly replicated for partition tables after the publisher has
changed the table schema.
Fix it by resetting the required entries in the partition map cache after
receiving a new relation mapping from the publisher.
Reported-by: Shi Yu
Author: Shi Yu, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSZPR01MB6310F46CD425A967E4AEF736FDA49@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
While building a new attrmap which maps partition attribute numbers to
remoterel's, we incorrectly update the map for dropped column attributes.
Later, it caused cache look-up failure when we tried to use the map to
fetch the information about attributes.
This also fixes the partition map cache invalidation which was using the
wrong type cast to fetch the entry. We were using stale partition map
entry after invalidation which leads to the assertion or cache look-up
failure.
Reported-by: Shi Yu
Author: Hou Zhijie, Shi Yu
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSZPR01MB6310F46CD425A967E4AEF736FDA49@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Recent additions to the subscription tests check for log entries, but
fail to account for the possible presence of an SQL errror code, which
happens if log_error_verbosity is set to 'verbose'. Add this into the
regular expressions that are checked for.
In commit ec62cb0aa, I foolishly replaced ExecEvalWholeRowVar's
lookup_rowtype_tupdesc_domain call with just lookup_rowtype_tupdesc,
because I didn't see how a domain could be involved there, and
there were no regression test cases to jog my memory. But the
existing code was correct, so revert that change and add a test
case showing why it's necessary. (Note: per comment in struct
DatumTupleFields, it is correct to produce an output tuple that's
labeled with the base composite type, not the domain; hence just
blindly looking through the domain is correct here.)
Per bug #17515 from Dan Kubb. Back-patch to v11 where domains over
composites became a thing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17515-a24737438363aca0@postgresql.org
The new show-all-results feature in psql (7844c9918) went out of its
way to show notices next to the results of the statements (in a
multi-statement string) that caused them. This also had the
consequence that notices for a single statement were not shown until
after the statement had executed, instead of right away. After some
discussion, it seems very difficult to satisfy both of these goals, so
here we are giving up on the first goal and just show the notices as
we get them. This restores the pre-7844c9918 behavior for notices.
Reported-by: Alastair McKinley <a.mckinley@analyticsengines.com>
Author: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/PAXPR02MB760039506C87A2083AD85575E3DA9%40PAXPR02MB7600.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com
Currently, we simply combine the column lists when publishing tables on
multiple publications and that can sometimes lead to unexpected behavior.
Say, if a column is published in any row-filtered publication, then the
values for that column are sent to the subscriber even for rows that don't
match the row filter, as long as the row matches the row filter for any
other publication, even if that other publication doesn't include the
column.
The main purpose of introducing a column list is to have statically
different shapes on publisher and subscriber or hide sensitive column
data. In both cases, it doesn't seem to make sense to combine column
lists.
So, we disallow the cases where the column list is different for the same
table when combining publications. It can be later extended to combine the
column lists for selective cases where required.
Reported-by: Alvaro Herrera
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202204251548.mudq7jbqnh7r@alvherre.pgsql
foreign_data has kept around a set of tests for TRUNCATE to look after
the case of foreign tables, with[out] inheritance and with[out]
partitions, assuming that the command is not supported for this relkind.
However, TRUNCATE is supported on foreign tables if the FDW involved is
able to handle the command, like postgres_fdw.
Note that postgres_fdw includes tests to cover all the cases removed by
this commit (which had misleading comments), so these did not provide
any additional coverage anyway.
Author: Yugo Nagata
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220527172543.0a2fdb469cf048b81c0967d3@sraoss.co.jp
9d9c02ccd added code to allow the executor to take shortcuts when quals
on monotonic window functions guaranteed that once the qual became false
it could never become true again. When possible, baserestrictinfo quals
are converted to become these quals, which we call run conditions.
Unfortunately, in 9d9c02ccd, I forgot to update
remove_unused_subquery_outputs to teach it about these run conditions.
This could cause a WindowFunc column which was unused in the target list
but referenced by an upper-level WHERE clause to be removed from the
subquery when the qual in the WHERE clause was converted into a window run
condition. Because of this, the entire WindowClause would be removed from
the query resulting in additional rows making it into the resultset when
they should have been filtered out by the WHERE clause.
Here we fix this by recording which target list items in the subquery have
run conditions. That gets passed along to remove_unused_subquery_outputs
to tell it not to remove these items from the target list.
Bug: #17495
Reported-by: Jeremy Evans
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17495-7ffe2fa0b261b9fa@postgresql.org
On slow machines the modified test could end up switching the order in which
transactional stats are reported in one session and non-transactional stats in
another session. As stats handling of truncate is implemented as setting
live/dead rows 0, the order in which a truncate's stats changes are applied,
relative to normal stats updates, matters. The handling of stats for truncate
hasn't changed due to shared memory stats, this is longstanding behavior.
We might want to improve truncate's stats handling in the future, but for now
just change the order of forced flushed to make the test stable.
Reported-By: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YoZf7U/WmfmFYFEx@msg.df7cb.de
ruleutils.c was coded to suppress the AS label for a SELECT output
expression if the column name is "?column?", which is the parser's
fallback if it can't think of something better. This is fine, and
avoids ugly clutter, so long as (1) nothing further up in the parse
tree relies on that column name or (2) the same fallback would be
assigned when the rule or view definition is reloaded. Unfortunately
(2) is far from certain, both because ruleutils.c might print the
expression in a different form from how it was originally written
and because FigureColname's rules might change in future releases.
So we shouldn't rely on that.
Detecting exactly whether there is any outer-level use of a SELECT
column name would be rather expensive. This patch takes the simpler
approach of just passing down a flag indicating whether there *could*
be any outer use; for example, the output column names of a SubLink
are not referenceable, and we also do not care about the names exposed
by the right-hand side of a setop. This is sufficient to suppress
unwanted clutter in all but one case in the regression tests. That
seems like reasonable evidence that it won't be too much in users'
faces, while still fixing the cases we need to fix.
Per bug #17486 from Nicolas Lutic. This issue is ancient, so
back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17486-1ad6fd786728b8af@postgresql.org
This new-in-v15 test case assumed it could set max_stack_depth as high
as 2MB. You might think that'd be true on any modern platform but
you'd be wrong, as I found out while experimenting with NetBSD/hppa.
This test is about privileges not platform capabilities, so there seems
no need to use any value greater than the 100kB setting already used
in a couple of places in the core regression tests. There's certainly
no call to expect people to raise their platform's default ulimit just
to run this test.
When an implicit operator family is created, it wasn't getting reported.
Make it do so.
This has always been missing. Backpatch to 10.
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Leslie LEMAIRE <leslie.lemaire@developpement-durable.gouv.fr>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquiër <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f74d69e151b22171e8829551b1159e77@developpement-durable.gouv.fr
_pg_version (version number based on PostgreSQL::Version) is a field
private to Cluster.pm but there was no helper routine to retrieve it
from a Cluster's node. The same is done for install_path, for example,
and the version object becomes handy when writing tests that need
version-specific handling.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan, Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YoWfoJTc987tsxpV@paquier.xyz
Commit 923def9a53 and 52e4f0cd47 allowed to specify column lists and row
filters for publication tables. This commit extends the
pg_publication_tables view and pg_get_publication_tables function to
display that information.
This information will be useful to users and we also need this for the
later commit that prohibits combining multiple publications with different
column lists for the same table.
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed By: Amit Kapila, Alvaro Herrera, Shi Yu, Takamichi Osumi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202204251548.mudq7jbqnh7r@alvherre.pgsql
We weren't checking the length of the column list in the alias clause of
an XMLTABLE or JSON_TABLE function (a "tablefunc" RTE), and it was
possible to make the server crash by passing an overly long one. Fix it
by throwing an error in that case, like the other places that deal with
alias lists.
In passing, modify the equivalent test used for join RTEs to look like
the other ones, which was different for no apparent reason.
This bug came in when XMLTABLE was born in version 10; backpatch to all
stable versions.
Reported-by: Wang Ke <krking@zju.edu.cn>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17480-1c9d73565bb28e90@postgresql.org
We can use a single line to print all tuple counts that MERGE processed,
for conciseness, and elide those that are zeroes. Non-text formats
report all numbers, as is typical.
Per comment from Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220511163350.GL19626@telsasoft.com
In order to estimate the cache hit ratio of a Memoize node, one of the
inputs we require is the estimated number of times the Memoize node will
be rescanned. The higher this number, the large the cache hit ratio is
likely to become. Unfortunately, the value being passed as the number of
"calls" to the Memoize was incorrectly using the Nested Loop's
outer_path->parent->rows instead of outer_path->rows. This failed to
account for the fact that the outer_path might be parameterized by some
upper-level Nested Loop.
This problem could lead to Memoize plans appearing more favorable than
they might actually be. It could also lead to extended executor startup
times when work_mem values were large due to the planner setting overly
large MemoizePath->est_entries resulting in the Memoize hash table being
initially made much larger than might be required.
Fix this simply by passing outer_path->rows rather than
outer_path->parent->rows. Also, adjust the expected regression test
output for a plan change.
Reported-by: Pavel Stehule
Author: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRAMp%3DQsMi6sPQJ4W3hczoFJRvyXHJV3AZAZaMyTVM312Q%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14, where Memoize was introduced
Per BF animal chipmunk: CREATE DATABASE could apparently fail due to an
AV process being in the template database and not quitting fast enough
for the 5 second timeout in CountOtherDBBackends(). The test script had
autovacuum_naptime=1s to encourage more activity and opening of fds, but
that wasn't strictly necessary for this test. Take it out.
Per BF animal skink: there was a 300s timeout for all tests in the
script, but apparently that was not enough under valgrind. Let's use
the standard timeout $PostgreSQL::Test::Utils::timeout_default, but
restart it for each query we run.
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGKa8HNJaA24gqiiFoGy0ysndeVoJsHvX_q1-DVLFaGAmw%40mail.gmail.com
This follows in the footsteps of commit 2591ee8ec by removing one more
ill-advised shortcut from planning of GroupingFuncs. It's true that
we don't intend to execute the argument expression(s) at runtime, but
we still have to process any Vars appearing within them, or we risk
failure at setrefs.c time (or more fundamentally, in EXPLAIN trying
to print such an expression). Vars in upper plan nodes have to have
referents in the next plan level, whether we ever execute 'em or not.
Per bug #17479 from Michael J. Sullivan. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17479-6260deceaf0ad304@postgresql.org
The code for unloading a library has been commented-out for over 12
years, ever since commit 602a9ef5a7, and we're
no closer to supporting it now than we were back then.
Nathan Bossart, reviewed by Michael Paquier and by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/Ynsc9bRL1caUSBSE@paquier.xyz
The parser code that transformed VALUES from row-oriented to
column-oriented lists failed if there were zero columns.
You can't write that straightforwardly (though probably you
should be able to), but the case can be reached by expanding
a "tab.*" reference to a zero-column table.
Per bug #17477 from Wang Ke. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17477-0af3c6ac6b0a6ae0@postgresql.org
This reverts commit eafdf9de06
and its back-branch counterparts. Corey Huinker pointed out that
we'd discussed this exact change back in 2016 and rejected it,
on the grounds that there's at least one usage pattern with LIMIT
where an infinite endpoint can usefully be used. Perhaps that
argument needs to be re-litigated, but there's no time left before
our back-branch releases. To keep our options open, restore the
status quo ante; if we do end up deciding to change things, waiting
one more quarter won't hurt anything.
Rather than just doing a straight revert, I added a new test case
demonstrating the usage with LIMIT. That'll at least remind us of
the issue if we forget again.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3603504.1652068977@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADkLM=dzw0Pvdqp5yWKxMd+VmNkAMhG=4ku7GnCZxebWnzmz3Q@mail.gmail.com
