c2a4078eb adjusted EXPLAIN ANALYZE to include BUFFERS by default, but
a few tests in select_into.sql neglected to add BUFFERS OFF. The
failing tests seem unlikely to ever access buffers during execution, but
they certainly could during planning.
Per buildfarm member kestrel, tayra and calliphoridae.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANNMO++W7MM8T0KyXN3ZheXXt-uLVM3aEtZd+WNfZ=obxffUiA@mail.gmail.com
The topic of turning EXPLAIN's BUFFERS option on with the ANALYZE option
has come up a few times over the past few years. In many ways, doing this
seems like a good idea as it may be more obvious to users why a given
query is running more slowly than they might expect. Also, from my own
(David's) personal experience, I've seen users posting to the mailing
lists with two identical plans, one slow and one fast asking why their
query is sometimes slow. In many cases, this is due to additional reads.
Having BUFFERS on by default may help reduce some of these questions, and
if not, make it more obvious to the user before they post, or save a
round-trip to the mailing list when additional I/O effort is the cause of
the slowness.
The general consensus is that we want BUFFERS on by default with
ANALYZE. However, there were more than zero concerns raised with doing
so. The primary reason against is the additional verbosity, making it
harder to read large plans. Another concern was that buffer information
isn't always useful so may not make sense to have it on by default.
It's currently December, so let's commit this to see if anyone comes
forward with a strong objection against making this change. We have over
half a year remaining in the v18 cycle where we could still easily consider
reverting this if someone were to come forward with a convincing enough
reason as to why doing this is a bad idea.
There were two patches independently submitted to achieve this goal, one
by me and the other by Guillaume. This commit is a mix of both of these
patches with some additional work done by me to adjust various
additional places in the documentation which include EXPLAIN ANALYZE
output.
Author: Guillaume Lelarge, David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Greg Sabino Mullane, Michael Christofides
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANNMO++W7MM8T0KyXN3ZheXXt-uLVM3aEtZd+WNfZ=obxffUiA@mail.gmail.com
This commit makes use of the overflow-aware routines in int.h to
fix a variety of reported overflow bugs in the date and timestamp
code. It seems unlikely that this fixes all such bugs in this
area, but since the problems seem limited to cases that are far
beyond any realistic usage, I'm not going to worry too much. Note
that for one bug, I've chosen to simply add a comment about the
overflow hazard because fixing it would require quite a bit of code
restructuring that doesn't seem worth the risk.
Since this is a bug fix, it could be back-patched, but given the
risk of conflicts with the new routines in int.h and the overall
risk/reward ratio of this patch, I've opted not to do so for now.
Fixes bug #18585 (except for the one case that's just commented).
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Matthew Kim, Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-by: Joseph Koshakow, Jian He
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31ad2cd1-db94-bdb3-f91a-65ffdb4bef95%40gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18585-db646741dd649abd%40postgresql.org
When pulling up a lateral subquery that is under an outer join, the
current code always wraps a Var or PHV in the subquery's targetlist
into a new PlaceHolderVar if it is a lateral reference to something
outside the subquery. This is necessary when the Var/PHV references
the non-nullable side of the outer join from the nullable side: we
need to ensure that it is evaluated at the right place and hence is
forced to null when the outer join should do so. However, if the
referenced rel is under the same lowest nulling outer join, we can
actually omit the wrapping. That's safe because if the subquery
variable is forced to NULL by the outer join, the lateral reference
variable will come out as NULL too. It could be beneficial to get rid
of such PHVs because they imply lateral dependencies, which force us
to resort to nestloop joins.
This patch leverages the newly introduced nullingrel_info to check if
the nullingrels of the subquery RTE are a subset of those of the
laterally referenced rel, in order to determine if the referenced rel
is under the same lowest nulling outer join.
No backpatch as this could result in plan changes.
Author: Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: James Coleman, Dmitry Dolgov, Andrei Lepikhov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48uk6C7Z9m_FNT8_21CMCk68hrgAsz=z6zpP1PNZMkeoQ@mail.gmail.com
When resetting a HashJoin node for rescans, if it is a single-batch
join and there are no parameter changes for the inner subnode, we can
just reuse the existing hash table without rebuilding it. However,
for join types that depend on the inner-tuple match flags in the hash
table, we need to reset these match flags to avoid incorrect results.
This applies to right, right-anti, right-semi, and full joins.
When I introduced "Right Semi Join" plan shapes in aa86129e1, I failed
to reset the match flags in the hash table for right-semi joins in
rescans. This oversight has been shown to produce incorrect results.
This patch fixes it.
Author: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-nQF9io2WL2SkD0eXvfPdyBc9Q=hRwfQHCGV2usa0jyA@mail.gmail.com
The error detail message "Replica identity consists of an unpublished
generated column." implies that the entire replica identity is made up of
an unpublished generated column which may not be the case.
Reported-by: Peter Smith
Author: Shlok Kyal
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PuwMhKx0PhOA4APhJTLoBGNykbeCQpr_CuwGT-SkswG5w@mail.gmail.com
When short-circuiting WindowAgg node evaluation on the top-level
WindowAgg node using quals on monotonic window functions, because the
WindowAgg run condition can mean there's no need to evaluate subsequent
window function results in the same partition once the run condition
becomes false, it was possible that the executor would use stale results
from the previous invocation of the window function in some cases.
A fix for this was partially done by a5832722, but that commit only
fixed the issue for non-top-level WindowAgg nodes. I mistakenly thought
that the top-level WindowAgg didn't have this issue, but Jayesh's example
case clearly shows that's incorrect. At the time, I also thought that
this only affected 32-bit systems as all window functions which then
supported run conditions returned BIGINT, however, that's wrong as
ExecProject is still called and that could cause evaluation of any other
window function belonging to the same WindowAgg node, one of which may
return a byref type.
The only queries affected by this are WindowAggs with a "Run Condition"
which contains at least one window function with a byref result type,
such as lead() or lag() on a byref column. The window clause must also
contain a PARTITION BY clause (without a PARTITION BY, execution of the
WindowAgg stops immediately when the run condition becomes false and
there's no risk of using the stale results).
Reported-by: Jayesh Dehankar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/193261e2c4d.3dd3cd7c1842.871636075166132237@zohocorp.com
Backpatch-through: 15, where WindowAgg run conditions were added
These format codes produce or consume strings of digits, so they
should be labeled with is_digit = true, but they were not.
This has effect in only one place, where is_next_separator()
is checked to see if the preceding format code should slurp up
all the available digits. Thus, with a format such as '...SSFF3'
with remaining input '12345', the 'SS' code would consume all
five digits (and then complain about seconds being out of range)
when it should eat only two digits.
Per report from Nick Davies. This bug goes back to d589f9446
where the FFn codes were introduced, so back-patch to v13.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AM8PR08MB6356AC979252CFEA78B56678B6312@AM8PR08MB6356.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com
Ensure stored generated columns that are part of REPLICA IDENTITY must be
published explicitly for UPDATE and DELETE operations to be published. We
can publish generated columns by listing them in the column list or by
enabling the publish_generated_columns option.
This commit changes the behavior of the test added in commit adedf54e65 by
giving an ERROR for the UPDATE operation in such cases. There is no way to
trigger the bug reported in commit adedf54e65 but we didn't remove the
corresponding code change because it is still relevant when replicating
changes from a publisher with version less than 18.
We decided not to backpatch this behavior change to avoid the risk of
breaking existing output plugins that may be sending generated columns by
default although we are not aware of any such plugin. Also, we didn't see
any reports related to this on STABLE branches which is another reason not
to backpatch this change.
Author: Shlok Kyal, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Vignesh C, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANhcyEVw4V2Awe2AB6i0E5AJLNdASShGfdBLbUd1XtWDboymCA@mail.gmail.com
MD5 has been considered to be unsuitable for use as a cryptographic
hash algorithm for some time. Furthermore, MD5 password hashes in
PostgreSQL are vulnerable to pass-the-hash attacks, i.e., knowing
the username and hashed password is sufficient to authenticate.
The SCRAM-SHA-256 method added in v10 is not subject to these
problems and is considered to be superior to MD5.
This commit marks MD5 password support in PostgreSQL as deprecated
and to be removed in a future release. The documentation now
contains several deprecation notices, and CREATE ROLE and ALTER
ROLE now emit deprecation warnings when setting MD5 passwords. The
warnings can be disabled by setting the md5_password_warnings
parameter to "off".
Reviewed-by: Greg Sabino Mullane, Jim Nasby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZwbfpJJol7lDWajL%40nathan
According to the SQL standard, if the referential action RESTRICT is
triggered, it has its own error code. We previously didn't use that,
we just used the error code for foreign key violation. But RESTRICT
is not necessarily an actual foreign key violation. The foreign key
might still be satisfied in theory afterwards, but the RESTRICT
setting prevents the action even then. So it's a separate kind of
error condition.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ea5b2777-266a-46fa-852f-6fca6ec480ad@eisentraut.org
As I'd feared, commit 5c9d8636d was still a few bricks shy of a load.
We can't just leave pulled-up lateral-reference Vars with no new
nullingrels: we have to carefully compute what subset of the
to-be-replaced Var's nullingrels apply to them, else we still get
"wrong varnullingrels" errors. This is a bit tedious, but it looks
like we can use the nullingrel data this patch computes for other
purposes, enabling better optimization. We don't want to inject
unnecessary plan changes into stable branches though, so leave that
idea for a later HEAD-only patch.
Patch by me, but thanks to Richard Guo for devising a test case that
broke 5c9d8636d, and for preliminary investigation about how to fix
it. As before, back-patch to v16.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1tGn4j-0003zi-MP@gemulon.postgresql.org
Some of the behaviors of the different referential actions, such as
the difference between NO ACTION and RESTRICT are best illustrated
using a case-insensitive collation. So add some tests for that.
(What is actually being tested here is the behavior with values that
are "distinct" (binary different) but compare as equal. Another way
to do that would be with positive and negative zeroes with float
types. But this way seems nicer and more flexible.)
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ea5b2777-266a-46fa-852f-6fca6ec480ad@eisentraut.org
There is no point in transforming OR-clauses into SAOP's if the target index
doesn't support SAOP scans anyway. This commit adds corresponding checks
to match_orclause_to_indexcol() and group_similar_or_args(). The first check
fixes the actual bug, while the second just saves some cycles.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8174de69-9e1a-0827-0e81-ef97f56a5939%40gmail.com
Author: Alena Rybakina
Reviewed-by: Ranier Vilela, Alexander Korotkov, Andrei Lepikhov
If we are pulling up a subquery that's under an outer join, and
the subquery's target list contains a strict expression that uses
both a subquery variable and a lateral-reference variable, it's okay
to pull up the expression without wrapping it in a PlaceHolderVar.
That's safe because if the subquery variable is forced to NULL
by the outer join, the expression result will come out as NULL too,
so we don't have to force that outcome by evaluating the expression
below the outer join. It'd be correct to wrap in a PHV, but that can
lead to very significantly worse plans, since we'd then have to use
a nestloop plan to pass down the lateral reference to where the
expression will be evaluated.
However, when we do that, we should not mark the lateral reference
variable as being nulled by the outer join, because it isn't after
we pull up the expression in this way. So the marking logic added
by cb8e50a4a was incorrect in this detail, leading to "wrong
varnullingrels" errors from the consistency-checking logic in
setrefs.c. It seems to be sufficient to just not mark lateral
references at all in this case. (I have a nagging feeling that more
complexity may be needed in cases where there are several levels of
outer join, but some attempts to break it with that didn't succeed.)
Per report from Bertrand Mamasam. Back-patch to v16, as the previous
patch was.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACZ67_UA_EVrqiFXJu9XK50baEpH=ofEPJswa2kFxg6xuSw-ww@mail.gmail.com
Commit 0785d1b8b adds support for libpq as a JSON client, but
allocations for string tokens can still be leaked during parsing
failures. This is tricky to fix for the object_field semantic callbacks:
the field name must remain valid until the end of the object, but if a
parsing error is encountered partway through, object_field_end() won't
be invoked and the client won't get a chance to free the field name.
This patch adds a flag to switch the ownership of parsed tokens to the
lexer. When this is enabled, the client must make a copy of any tokens
it wants to persist past the callback lifetime, but the lexer will
handle necessary cleanup on failure.
Backend uses of the JSON parser don't need to use this flag, since the
parser's allocations will occur in a short lived memory context.
A -o option has been added to test_json_parser_incremental to exercise
the new setJsonLexContextOwnsTokens() API, and the test_json_parser TAP
tests make use of it. (The test program now cleans up allocated memory,
so that tests can be usefully run under leak sanitizers.)
Author: Jacob Champion
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOYmi+kb38EciwyBQOf9peApKGwraHqA7pgzBkvoUnw5BRfS1g@mail.gmail.com
We added pg_constraint rows for all not-null constraints, first for
tables and later for domains; but while the ones for tables were
reverted, the ones for domains were not. However, we did accidentally
revert ruleutils.c support for the ones on domains in 6f8bb7c1e9,
which breaks running pg_get_constraintdef() on them. Put that back.
This is only needed in branch 17, because we've reinstated this code in
branch master with commit 14e87ffa5c. Add some new tests in both
branches.
I couldn't find anything else that needs de-reverting.
Reported-by: Erki Eessaar <erki.eessaar@taltech.ee>
Reviewed-by: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AS8PR01MB75110350415AAB8BBABBA1ECFE222@AS8PR01MB7511.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com
This allows for example using LIKE with case-insensitive collations.
There was previously no internal implementation of this, so it was met
with a not-supported error. This adds the internal implementation and
removes the error. The implementation follows the specification of
the SQL standard for this.
Unlike with deterministic collations, the LIKE matching cannot go
character by character but has to go substring by substring. For
example, if we are matching against LIKE 'foo%bar', we can't start by
looking for an 'f', then an 'o', but instead with have to find
something that matches 'foo'. This is because the collation could
consider substrings of different lengths to be equal. This is all
internal to MatchText() in like_match.c.
The changes in GenericMatchText() in like.c just pass through the
locale information to MatchText(), which was previously not needed.
This matches exactly Generic_Text_IC_like() below.
ILIKE is not affected. (It's unclear whether ILIKE makes sense under
nondeterministic collations.)
This also updates match_pattern_prefix() in like_support.c to support
optimizing the case of an exact pattern with nondeterministic
collations. This was already alluded to in the previous code.
(includes documentation examples from Daniel Vérité and test cases
from Paul A Jungwirth)
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/700d2e86-bf75-4607-9cf2-f5b7802f6e88@eisentraut.org
Currently, logical replication produces a generic error message when
targeting a subscriber-side table column that is either missing or
generated. The error message can be misleading for generated columns.
This patch introduces a specific error message to clarify the issue when
generated columns are involved.
Author: Shubham Khanna
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Vignesh C, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHv8RjJBvYtqU7OAofBizOmQOK2Q8h+w9v2_cQWxT_gO7er3Aw@mail.gmail.com
Commit a8ccf4e93 uses the same table name "distinct_tbl" in both
select_distinct.sql and select_distinct_on.sql, which could cause
conflicts when these two test scripts are run in parallel.
Fix by renaming the table in select_distinct_on.sql to
"distinct_on_tbl".
Per buildfarm (via Tom Lane)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1572004.1732583549@sss.pgh.pa.us
The ordering of DISTINCT items is semantically insignificant, so we
can reorder them as needed. In fact, in the parser, we absorb the
sorting semantics of the sortClause as much as possible into the
distinctClause, ensuring that one clause is a prefix of the other.
This can help avoid a possible need to re-sort.
In this commit, we attempt to adjust the DISTINCT keys to match the
input path's pathkeys. This can likewise help avoid re-sorting, or
allow us to use incremental-sort to save efforts.
For DISTINCT ON expressions, the parser already ensures that they
match the initial ORDER BY expressions. When reordering the DISTINCT
keys, we must ensure that the resulting pathkey list matches the
initial distinctClause pathkeys.
This introduces a new GUC, enable_distinct_reordering, which allows
the optimization to be disabled if needed.
Author: Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48dR26cCcX0f=8bja2JKQPcU64136kHk=xekHT9xschiQ@mail.gmail.com
If passed a read-write expanded object pointer, the EEOP_NULLIF
code would hand that same pointer to the equality function
and then (unless equality was reported) also return the same
pointer as its value. This is no good, because a function that
receives a read-write expanded object pointer is fully entitled
to scribble on or even delete the object, thus corrupting the
NULLIF output. (This problem is likely unobservable with the
equality functions provided in core Postgres, but it's easy to
demonstrate with one coded in plpgsql.)
To fix, make sure the pointer passed to the equality function
is read-only. We can still return the original read-write
pointer as the NULLIF result, allowing optimization of later
operations.
Per bug #18722 from Alexander Lakhin. This has been wrong
since we invented expanded objects, so back-patch to all
supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18722-fd9e645448cc78b4@postgresql.org
This WARNING appeared because SearchSysCacheLocked1() read
cc_relisshared before catcache initialization, when the field is false
unconditionally. On the basis of reading false there, it constructed a
locktag as though pg_tablespace weren't relisshared. Only shared
catalogs could be affected, and only GRANT TABLESPACE was affected in
practice. SearchSysCacheLocked1() callers use one other shared-relation
syscache, DATABASEOID. DATABASEOID is initialized by the end of
CheckMyDatabase(), making the problem unreachable for pg_database.
Back-patch to v13 (all supported versions). This has no known impact
before v16, where ExecGrant_common() first appeared. Earlier branches
avoid trouble by having a separate ExecGrant_Tablespace() that doesn't
use LOCKTAG_TUPLE. However, leaving this unfixed in v15 could ensnare a
future back-patch of a SearchSysCacheLocked1() call.
Reported by Aya Iwata.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS7PR01MB11964507B5548245A7EE54E70EA212@OS7PR01MB11964.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Commit 7b88529f43 fixed a regression
spanning these features, but it didn't test them. It did test code
paths sufficient for their present implementations, so no back-patch.
Reported by Matthew Woodcraft.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87iksnsbhx.fsf@golux.woodcraft.me.uk
When optimizer generates bitmap paths, it considers breaking OR-clause
arguments one-by-one. But now, a group of similar OR-clauses can be
transformed into SAOP during index matching. So, bitmap paths should
keep up.
This commit teaches bitmap paths generation machinery to group similar
OR-clauses into dedicated RestrictInfos. Those RestrictInfos are considered
both to match index as a whole (as SAOP), or to match as a set of individual
OR-clause argument one-by-one (the old way).
Therefore, bitmap path generation will takes advantage of OR-clauses to SAOP's
transformation. The old way of handling them is also considered. So, there
shouldn't be planning regression.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdu5iQOjF93vGbjidsQkhHvY2NSm29duENYH_cbhC6x%2BMg%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov, Andrey Lepikhov
Reviewed-by: Alena Rybakina, Andrei Lepikhov, Jian he, Robert Haas
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan
This commit makes match_clause_to_indexcol() match
"(indexkey op C1) OR (indexkey op C2) ... (indexkey op CN)" expression
to the index while transforming it into "indexkey op ANY(ARRAY[C1, C2, ...])"
(ScalarArrayOpExpr node).
This transformation allows handling long OR-clauses with single IndexScan
avoiding diving them into a slower BitmapOr.
We currently restrict Ci to be either Const or Param to apply this
transformation only when it's clearly beneficial. However, in the future,
we might switch to a liberal understanding of constants, as it is in other
cases.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/567ED6CA.2040504%40sigaev.ru
Author: Alena Rybakina, Andrey Lepikhov, Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan, Ranier Vilela, Alexander Korotkov, Robert Haas
Reviewed-by: Jian He, Tom Lane, Nikolay Shaplov
Like INT64_FORMAT and UINT64_FORMAT, these macros produce format
strings for 64-bit integers. However, INT64_HEX_FORMAT and
UINT64_HEX_FORMAT generate the output in hexadecimal instead of
decimal. Besides introducing these macros, this commit makes use
of them in several places. This was originally intended to be part
of commit 5d6187d2a2, but I left it out because I felt there was a
nonzero chance that back-patching these new macros into c.h could
cause problems with third-party code. We tend to be less cautious
with such changes in new major versions.
Note that UINT64_HEX_FORMAT was originally added in commit
ee1b30f128, but it was placed in test_radixtree.c, so it wasn't
widely available. This commit moves UINT64_HEX_FORMAT to c.h.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZwQvtUbPKaaRQezd%40nathan
This new field controls if entries of a stats kind should be written or
not to the on-disk pgstats file when shutting down an instance. This
affects both fixed and variable-numbered kinds.
This is useful for custom statistics by itself, and a patch is under
discussion to add a new builtin stats kind where the write of the stats
is not necessary. All the built-in stats kinds, as well as the two
custom stats kinds in the test module injection_points, set this flag to
"true" for now, so as stats entries are written to the on-disk pgstats
file.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Reviewed-by: Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zz7T47nHwYgeYwOe@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
After commit 5a2fed911a, the catalog state
resulting from these commands ceased to affect sessions. Restore the
longstanding behavior, which is like beginning the session with a SET
ROLE command. If cherry-picking the CVE-2024-10978 fixes, default to
including this, too. (This fixes an unintended side effect of fixing
CVE-2024-10978.) Back-patch to v12, like that commit. The release team
decided to include v12, despite the original intent to halt v12 commits
earlier this week.
Tom Lane and Noah Misch. Reported by Etienne LAFARGE.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADOZwSb0UsEr4_UTFXC5k7=fyyK8uKXekucd+-uuGjJsGBfxgw@mail.gmail.com
In commit 08c0d6ad6 which introduced "rainbow" arcs in regex NFAs,
I didn't think terribly hard about what to do when creating the color
complement of a rainbow arc. Clearly, the complement cannot match any
characters, and I took the easy way out by just not building any arcs
at all in the complement arc set. That mostly works, but Nikolay
Shaplov found a case where it doesn't: if we decide to delete that
sub-NFA later because it's inside a "{0}" quantifier, delsub()
suffered an assertion failure. That's because delsub() relies on
the target sub-NFA being fully connected. That was always true
before, and the best fix seems to be to restore that property.
Hence, invent a new arc type CANTMATCH that can be generated in
place of an empty color complement, and drop it again later when we
start NFA optimization. (At that point we don't need to do delsub()
any more, and besides there are other cases where NFA optimization can
lead to disconnected subgraphs.)
It appears that this bug has no consequences in a non-assert-enabled
build: there will be some transiently leaked NFA states/arcs, but
they'll get cleaned up eventually. Still, we don't like assertion
failures, so back-patch to v14 where rainbow arcs were introduced.
Per bug #18708 from Nikolay Shaplov.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18708-f94f2599c9d2c005@postgresql.org
Allowing foreign keys where the referenced and the referencing columns
have collations with different notions of equality is problematic.
This can only happen when using nondeterministic collations, for
example, if the referencing column is case-insensitive and the
referenced column is not, or vice versa. It does not happen if both
collations are deterministic.
To show one example:
CREATE COLLATION case_insensitive (provider = icu, deterministic = false, locale = 'und-u-ks-level2');
CREATE TABLE pktable (x text COLLATE "C" PRIMARY KEY);
CREATE TABLE fktable (x text COLLATE case_insensitive REFERENCES pktable ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE);
INSERT INTO pktable VALUES ('A'), ('a');
INSERT INTO fktable VALUES ('A');
BEGIN; DELETE FROM pktable WHERE x = 'a'; TABLE fktable; ROLLBACK;
BEGIN; DELETE FROM pktable WHERE x = 'A'; TABLE fktable; ROLLBACK;
Both of these DELETE statements delete the one row from fktable. So
this means that one row from fktable references two rows in pktable,
which should not happen. (That's why a primary key or unique
constraint is required on pktable.)
When nondeterministic collations were implemented, the SQL standard
available to yours truly said that referential integrity checks should
be performed with the collation of the referenced column, and so
that's how we implemented it. But this turned out to be a mistake in
the SQL standard, for the same reasons as above, that was later
(SQL:2016) fixed to require both collations to be the same. So that's
what we are aiming for here.
We don't have to be quite so strict. We can allow different
collations if they are both deterministic. This is also good for
backward compatibility.
So the new rule is that the collations either have to be the same or
both deterministic. Or in other words, if one of them is
nondeterministic, then both have to be the same.
Users upgrading from before that have affected setups will need to
make changes to their schemas (i.e., change one or both collations in
affected foreign-key relationships) before the upgrade will succeed.
Some of the nice test cases for the previous situation in
collate.icu.utf8.sql are now obsolete. They are changed to just check
the error checking of the new rule. Note that collate.sql already
contained a test for foreign keys with different deterministic
collations.
A bunch of code in ri_triggers.c that added a COLLATE clause to
enforce the referenced column's collation can be removed, because both
columns now have to have the same notion of equality, so it doesn't
matter which one to use.
Reported-by: Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/78d824e0-b21e-480d-a252-e4b84bc2c24b@illuminatedcomputing.com
Refactor objectNamesToOids() to use get_object_address() internally if
possible. Not only does this save a lot of code, it also allows us to
use the object locking provided by get_object_address() for
GRANT/REVOKE. There was previously a code comment that complained
about the lack of locking in objectNamesToOids(), which is now fixed.
The check in ExecGrant_Type_check() is obsolete because
get_object_address_type() already does the same check.
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/bf72b82c-124d-4efa-a484-bb928e9494e4@eisentraut.org
Previously, the postmaster would never try to kill dead-end child
processes, even if there were no other processes left. A dead-end
backend will eventually exit, when authentication_timeout expires, but
if a dead-end backend is the only thing that's preventing the server
from shutting down, it seems better to kill it immediately. It's
particularly important, if there was a bug in the early startup code
that prevented a dead-end child from timing out and exiting normally.
Includes a test for that case where a dead-end backend previously
prevented the server from shutting down.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/a102f15f-eac4-4ff2-af02-f9ff209ec66f@iki.fi
The SQL spec mandates that SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION implies
SET ROLE NONE. We tried to implement that within the lowest-level
functions that manipulate these settings, but that was a bad idea.
In particular, guc.c assumes that it doesn't matter in what order
it applies GUC variable updates, but that was not the case for these
two variables. This problem, compounded by some hackish attempts to
work around it, led to some security-grade issues:
* Rolling back a transaction that had done SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION
would revert to SET ROLE NONE, even if that had not been the previous
state, so that the effective user ID might now be different from what
it had been.
* The same for SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION in a function SET clause.
* If a parallel worker inspected current_setting('role'), it saw
"none" even when it should see something else.
Also, although the parallel worker startup code intended to cope
with the current role's pg_authid row having disappeared, its
implementation of that was incomplete so it would still fail.
Fix by fully separating the miscinit.c functions that assign
session_authorization from those that assign role. To implement the
spec's requirement, teach set_config_option itself to perform "SET
ROLE NONE" when it sets session_authorization. (This is undoubtedly
ugly, but the alternatives seem worse. In particular, there's no way
to do it within assign_session_authorization without incompatible
changes in the API for GUC assign hooks.) Also, improve
ParallelWorkerMain to directly set all the relevant user-ID variables
instead of relying on some of them to get set indirectly. That
allows us to survive not finding the pg_authid row during worker
startup.
In v16 and earlier, this includes back-patching 9987a7bf3 which
fixed a violation of GUC coding rules: SetSessionAuthorization
is not an appropriate place to be throwing errors from.
Security: CVE-2024-10978
If a CTE, subquery, sublink, security invoker view, or coercion
projection references a table with row-level security policies, we
neglected to mark the plan as potentially dependent on which role
is executing it. This could lead to later executions in the same
session returning or hiding rows that should have been hidden or
returned instead.
Reported-by: Wolfgang Walther
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch
Security: CVE-2024-10976
Backpatch-through: 12
Many process environment variables (e.g. PATH), bypass the containment
expected of a trusted PL. Hence, trusted PLs must not offer features
that achieve setenv(). Otherwise, an attacker having USAGE privilege on
the language often can achieve arbitrary code execution, even if the
attacker lacks a database server operating system user.
To fix PL/Perl, replace trusted PL/Perl %ENV with a tied hash that just
replaces each modification attempt with a warning. Sites that reach
these warnings should evaluate the application-specific implications of
proceeding without the environment modification:
Can the application reasonably proceed without the modification?
If no, switch to plperlu or another approach.
If yes, the application should change the code to stop attempting
environment modifications. If that's too difficult, add "untie
%main::ENV" in any code executed before the warning. For example,
one might add it to the start of the affected function or even to
the plperl.on_plperl_init setting.
In passing, link to Perl's guidance about the Perl features behind the
security posture of PL/Perl.
Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions).
Andrew Dunstan and Noah Misch
Security: CVE-2024-10979
Two attributes are added to pg_stat_database:
* parallel_workers_to_launch, counting the total number of parallel
workers that were planned to be launched.
* parallel_workers_launched, counting the total number of parallel
workers actually launched.
The ratio of both fields can provide hints that there are not enough
slots available when launching parallel workers, also useful when
pg_stat_statements is not deployed on an instance (i.e. cf54a2c002).
This commit relies on de3a2ea3b2, that has added two fields to EState,
that get incremented when executing Gather or GatherMerge nodes.
A test is added in select_parallel, where parallel workers are spawned.
Bump catalog version.
Author: Benoit Lobréau
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/783bc7f7-659a-42fa-99dd-ee0565644e25@dalibo.com
We now create contype='n' pg_constraint rows for not-null constraints on
user tables. Only one such constraint is allowed for a column.
We propagate these constraints to other tables during operations such as
adding inheritance relationships, creating and attaching partitions and
creating tables LIKE other tables. These related constraints mostly
follow the well-known rules of conislocal and coninhcount that we have
for CHECK constraints, with some adaptations: for example, as opposed to
CHECK constraints, we don't match not-null ones by name when descending
a hierarchy to alter or remove it, instead matching by the name of the
column that they apply to. This means we don't require the constraint
names to be identical across a hierarchy.
The inheritance status of these constraints can be controlled: now we
can be sure that if a parent table has one, then all children will have
it as well. They can optionally be marked NO INHERIT, and then children
are free not to have one. (There's currently no support for altering a
NO INHERIT constraint into inheriting down the hierarchy, but that's a
desirable future feature.)
This also opens the door for having these constraints be marked NOT
VALID, as well as allowing UNIQUE+NOT NULL to be used for functional
dependency determination, as envisioned by commit e49ae8d3bc. It's
likely possible to allow DEFERRABLE constraints as followup work, as
well.
psql shows these constraints in \d+, though we may want to reconsider if
this turns out to be too noisy. Earlier versions of this patch hid
constraints that were on the same columns of the primary key, but I'm
not sure that that's very useful. If clutter is a problem, we might be
better off inventing a new \d++ command and not showing the constraints
in \d+.
For now, we omit these constraints on system catalog columns, because
they're unlikely to achieve anything.
The main difference to the previous attempt at this (b0e96f3119) is
that we now require that such a constraint always exists when a primary
key is in the column; we didn't require this previously which had a
number of unpalatable consequences. With this requirement, the code is
easier to reason about. For example:
- We no longer have "throwaway constraints" during pg_dump. We needed
those for the case where a table had a PK without a not-null
underneath, to prevent a slow scan of the data during restore of the
PK creation, which was particularly problematic for pg_upgrade.
- We no longer have to cope with attnotnull being set spuriously in
case a primary key is dropped indirectly (e.g., via DROP COLUMN).
Some bits of code in this patch were authored by Jian He.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Author: Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>
Reviewed-by: 何建 (jian he) <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: 王刚 (Tender Wang) <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202408310358.sdhumtyuy2ht@alvherre.pgsql
If the collation of any join key column doesn’t match the collation of
the corresponding partition key, partitionwise joins can yield incorrect
results. For example, rows that would match under the join key collation
might be located in different partitions due to the partitioning
collation. In such cases, a partitionwise join would yield different
results from a non-partitionwise join, so disallow it in such cases.
Reported-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNno_HKiQ6PqyLYfuqDtwp7KKHZiH1J7Pqyz0nr+PS2Dwg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12
If the collation of any grouping column doesn’t match the collation of
the corresponding partition key, partitionwise grouping can yield
incorrect results. For example, rows that would be grouped under the
grouping collation may end up in different partitions under the
partitioning collation. In such cases, full partitionwise grouping
would produce results that differ from those without partitionwise
grouping, so disallowed that.
Partial partitionwise aggregation is still allowed, as the Finalize
step reconciles partition-level aggregates with grouping requirements
across all partitions, ensuring that the final output remains
consistent.
This commit also fixes group_by_has_partkey() by ensuring the
RelabelType node is stripped from grouping expressions when matching
them to partition key expressions to avoid false mismatches.
Bug: #18568
Reported-by: Webbo Han <1105066510@qq.com>
Author: Webbo Han <1105066510@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18568-2a9afb6b9f7e6ed3@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/tencent_9D9103CDA420C07768349CC1DFF88465F90A@qq.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNno_HKiQ6PqyLYfuqDtwp7KKHZiH1J7Pqyz0nr+PS2Dwg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12
When we generate multiple clones of the same qual condition to cope
with outer join identity 3, we need to ensure that all the clones get
the same serial number. To achieve this, we reset the
root->last_rinfo_serial counter each time we produce RestrictInfo(s)
from the qual list (see deconstruct_distribute_oj_quals). This
approach works only if we ensure that we are not changing the qual
list in any way that'd affect the number of RestrictInfos built from
it.
However, with b262ad440, an IS NULL qual on a NOT NULL column might
result in an additional constant-FALSE RestrictInfo. And different
versions of the same qual clause can lead to different conclusions
about whether it can be reduced to constant-FALSE. This would affect
the number of RestrictInfos built from the qual list for different
versions, causing inconsistent RestrictInfo serial numbers across
multiple clones of the same qual. This inconsistency can confuse
users of these serial numbers, such as rebuild_joinclause_attr_needed,
and lead to planner errors such as "ERROR: variable not found in
subplan target lists".
To fix, reset the root->last_rinfo_serial counter after generating the
additional constant-FALSE RestrictInfo.
Back-patch to v17 where the issue crept in. In v17, I failed to make
a test case that would expose this bug, so no test case for v17.
Author: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-B6kafn+LmPuh-TYFwFyEm-vVj3Qqv7Yo-69CEv14rRg@mail.gmail.com
