pg_upgrade has always attempted to ensure that the transient dump files
it creates are inaccessible except to the owner. However, refactoring
in commit 76a7650c4 broke that for the file containing "pg_dumpall -g"
output; since then, that file was protected according to the process's
default umask. Since that file may contain role passwords (hopefully
encrypted, but passwords nonetheless), this is a particularly unfortunate
oversight. Prudent users of pg_upgrade on multiuser systems would
probably run it under a umask tight enough that the issue is moot, but
perhaps some users are depending only on pg_upgrade's umask changes to
protect their data.
To fix this in a future-proof way, let's just tighten the umask at
process start. There are no files pg_upgrade needs to write at a
weaker security level; and if there were, transiently relaxing the
umask around where they're created would be a safer approach.
Report and patch by Tom Lane; the idea for the fix is due to Noah Misch.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Security: CVE-2018-1053
_tocEntryRequired() expects that it can identify ACL, SECURITY LABEL,
and COMMENT TOC entries that are for large objects by seeing whether
the tag for them starts with "LARGE OBJECT ". While that works fine
for actual large objects, which are indeed tagged that way, it's
subject to false positives unless every such entry's tag starts with an
appropriate type ID. And in fact it does not work for ACLs, because
up to now we customarily tagged those entries with just the bare name
of the object. This means that an ACL for an object named
"LARGE OBJECT something" would be misclassified as data not schema,
with undesirable results in a schema-only or data-only dump ---
although pg_upgrade seems unaffected, due to the special case for
binary-upgrade mode further down in _tocEntryRequired().
We can fix this by changing all the dumpACL calls to use the label
strings already in use for comments and security labels, which do
follow the convention of starting with an object type indicator.
Well, mostly they follow it. dumpDatabase() got it wrong, using
just the bare database name for those purposes, so that a database
named "LARGE OBJECT something" would similarly be subject to having
its comment or security label dropped or included when not wanted.
Bring that into line too. (Note that up to now, database ACLs have
not been processed by pg_dump, so that this issue doesn't affect them.)
_tocEntryRequired() itself is not free of fault: it was overly liberal
about matching object tags to "LARGE OBJECT " in binary-upgrade mode.
This looks like it is probably harmless because there would be no data
component to strip anyway in that mode, but at best it's trouble
waiting to happen, so tighten that up too.
The possible misclassification of SECURITY LABEL entries for databases is
in principle a security problem, but the opportunities for actual exploits
seem too narrow to be interesting. The other cases seem like just bugs,
since an object owner can change its ACL or comment for himself, he needn't
try to trick someone else into doing it by choosing a strange name.
This has been broken since per-large-object TOC entries were introduced
in 9.0, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21714.1516553459@sss.pgh.pa.us
Upcoming versions of glibc will contain copy_file_range(2), a wrapper
around a new linux syscall for in-kernel copying of data ranges. This
conflicts with pg_rewinds function of the same name.
Therefore rename pg_rewinds version. As our version isn't a generic
copying facility we decided to choose a rewind specific function name.
Per buildfarm animal caiman and subsequent discussion with Tom Lane.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20180103033425.w7jkljth3e26sduc@alap3.anarazel.dehttps://postgr.es/m/31122.1514951044@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: 9.5-, where pg_rewind was introduced
A candidate path needs to be canonicalized before being checked against
the mappings, because the mappings are also canonicalized. This is
especially relevant on Windows
Reported-by: nb <nbedxp@gmail.com>
Author: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
Buildfarm members skink and sungazer have both recently failed this
test, with symptoms indicating that the default 3-second timeout
isn't quite enough for those very slow systems. There's no reason
to be miserly with this timeout, so boost it to 60 seconds.
Back-patch to all versions containing this test. That may be overkill,
because the failure has only been observed in the v10 branch, but
I don't feel like having to revisit this later.
Commit 3eb9a5e7c unintentionally introduced an ordering dependency
into restore_toc_entries_prefork(). The existing coding of
reduce_dependencies() contains a check to skip moving a TOC entry
to the ready_list if it wasn't initially in the pending_list.
This used to suffice to prevent reduce_dependencies() from trying to
move anything into the ready_list during restore_toc_entries_prefork(),
because the pending_list stayed empty throughout that phase; but it no
longer does. The problem doesn't manifest unless the TOC has been
reordered by SortTocFromFile, which is how I missed it in testing.
To fix, just add a test for ready_list == NULL, converting the call
with NULL from a poor man's sanity check into an explicit command
not to touch TOC items' list membership. Clarify some of the comments
around this; in particular, note the primary purpose of the check for
pending_list membership, which is to ensure that we can't try to restore
the same item twice, in case a TOC list forces it to be restored before
its dependency count goes to zero.
Per report from Fabrízio de Royes Mello. Back-patch to 9.3, like the
previous commit.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFcNs+pjuv0JL_x4+=71TPUPjdLHOXA4YfT32myj_OrrZb4ohA@mail.gmail.com
Because we push all ACL (i.e. GRANT/REVOKE) restore steps to the end,
materialized view refreshes were occurring while the permissions on
referenced objects were still at defaults. This led to failures if,
say, an MV owned by user A reads from a table owned by user B, even
if B had granted the necessary privileges to A. We've had multiple
complaints about that type of restore failure, most recently from
Jordan Gigov.
The ideal fix for this would be to start treating ACLs as dependency-
sortable objects, rather than hard-wiring anything about their dump order
(the existing approach is a messy kluge dating to commit dc0e76ca3).
But that's going to be a rather major change, and it certainly wouldn't
lead to a back-patchable fix. As a short-term solution, convert the
existing two-pass hack (ie, normal objects then ACLs) to a three-pass hack,
ie, normal objects then ACLs then matview refreshes. Because this happens
in RestoreArchive(), it will also fix the problem when restoring from an
existing archive-format dump.
(Note this means that if a matview refresh would have failed under the
permissions prevailing at dump time, it'll fail during restore as well.
We'll define that as user error rather than something we should try
to work around.)
To avoid performance loss in parallel restore, we need the matview
refreshes to still be parallelizable. Hence, clean things up enough
so that both ACLs and matviews are handled by the parallel restore
infrastructure, instead of reverting back to serial restore for ACLs.
There is still a final serial step, but it shouldn't normally have to
do anything; it's only there to try to recover if we get stuck due to
some problem like unresolved circular dependencies.
Patch by me, but it owes something to an earlier attempt by Kevin Grittner.
Back-patch to 9.3 where materialized views were introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28572.1500912583@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit 4d57e83816 added support for getting I/O errors out of zlib,
but it introduced a portability problem for systems without zlib.
Repair by wrapping the zlib call inside #ifdef and restore the original
code in the other branch.
This serves to illustrate the inadequacy of the zlib abstraction in
pg_backup_archiver: there is no way to call gzerror() in that
abstraction. This means that the several places that call GZREAD and
GZWRITE are currently doing error reporting wrongly, but ENOTIME to get
it fixed before next week's release set.
Backpatch to 9.4, like the commit that introduced the problem.
Some error reports were reporting strerror(errno), which for some error
conditions coming from zlib are wrong, resulting in confusing reports
such as
pg_restore: [compress_io] could not read from input file: Success
which makes no sense. To correctly extract the error message we need to
use gzerror(), so let's do that.
This isn't as comprehensive or as neat as I would like, but at least it
should improve things in many common cases. The zlib abstraction in
compress_io does not seem to be applied consistently enough; we could
perhaps improve that, but it seems master-only material, not a bug fix
for back-patching.
This problem goes back all the way, but I decided to apply back to 9.4
only, because older branches don't contain commit 14ea89366 which this
change depends on.
Authors: Vladimir Kunschikov, Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1498120508308.9826@infotecs.ru
Fix assorted places that had not bothered with the convention of
prefixing catalog and function names with "pg_catalog.". That
could possibly result in query failure when running with a nondefault
search_path. Also fix two places that weren't quoting OID literals.
I think the latter hasn't mattered much since about 7.3, but it's still
a bad idea to be doing it in 99 places and not in 2 others.
Also remove a useless EXISTS sub-select that someone had stuck into
describeOneTableDetails' queries for child tables. We just got the OID
out of pg_class, so I hardly see how checking that it exists in pg_class
was doing anything helpful.
In passing, try to improve the emitted formatting of a couple of
these queries, though I didn't work really hard on that. And merge
unnecessarily duplicative coding in some other places.
Much of this was new in HEAD, but some was quite old; back-patch
as appropriate.
pg_dump with the --clean option failed to emit DROP EVENT TRIGGER
commands for event triggers. In a closely related oversight,
it also did not emit ALTER OWNER commands for event triggers.
Since only superusers can create event triggers, the latter oversight
is of little practical consequence ... but if we're going to record
an owner for event triggers, then surely pg_dump should preserve it.
Per complaint from Greg Atkins. Back-patch to 9.3 where event triggers
were introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170722191142.yi4e7tzcg3iacclg@gmail.com
When incrementally updating a file larger than 2GB, the old code could
either fail outright (if the client asked the server for bytes beyond
the 2GB boundary) or fail to copy all the blocks that had actually
been modified (if the server reported a file size to the client in
excess of 2GB), resulting in data corruption. Generally, such files
won't occur anyway, but they might if using a non-default segment size
or if there the directory contains stray files unrelated to
PostgreSQL. Fix by a more prudent choice of data types.
Even with these improvements, this code still uses a mix of different
types (off_t, size_t, uint64, int64) to represent file sizes and
offsets, not all of which necessarily have the same width or
signedness, so further cleanup might be in order here. However, at
least now they all have the potential to be 64 bits wide on 64-bit
platforms.
Kuntal Ghosh and Michael Paquier, with a tweak by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAGz5QC+8gbkz=Brp0TgoKNqHWTzonbPtPex80U0O6Uh_bevbaA@mail.gmail.com
When writing a backup to stdout with pg_basebackup on Windows, put stdout
to binary mode. Any CR bytes in the output will otherwise be output
incorrectly as CR+LF.
In the passing, standardize on using "_setmode" instead of "setmode", for
the sake of consistency. They both do the same thing, but according to
MSDN documentation, setmode is deprecated.
Fixes bug #14634, reported by Henry Boehlert. Patch by Haribabu Kommi.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170428082818.24366.13134@wrigleys.postgresql.org
When commit 0f33a719fd removed the
instructions to start/stop the new cluster before running rsync, it was
now possible for pg_resetwal/pg_resetxlog to leave the final WAL record
at wal_level=minimum, preventing upgraded standby servers from
reconnecting.
This patch fixes that by having pg_upgrade unconditionally start/stop
the new cluster after pg_resetwal/pg_resetxlog has run.
Backpatch through 9.2 since, though the instructions were added in PG
9.5, they worked all the way back to 9.2.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170620171844.GC24975@momjian.us
Backpatch-through: 9.2
When materialized views were added, psql's \d commands were made to
treat them as a separate object category ... but not everyplace in the
documentation or comments got the memo.
Noted by David Johnston. Back-patch to 9.3 where matviews came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwb27M3VXRhHErjCpkWwN9eKThbqWb1=trtoXi9_ejqPXQ@mail.gmail.com
The combination of -Z -Fp and output to stdout resulted in corrupted
output data, because we left stdout in text mode, resulting in newline
conversion being done on the compressed stream. Switch stdout to binary
mode for this case, at the same place where we do it for non-text output
formats.
Report and patch by Kuntal Ghosh, tested by Ashutosh Sharma and Neha
Sharma. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGz5QCJPvbBjXAmJuGx1B_41yVCetAJhp7rtaDf7XQGWuB1GSw@mail.gmail.com
The current method of computing the record length (excluding the
lenght of full-page images) has been wrong since the WAL format has
been revamped in 2c03216d83. Only the
main record's length was counted, but that can be significantly too
little if there's data associated with further blocks.
Fix by computing the record length as total_lenght - fpi_length.
Reported-By: Chen Huajun
Bug: #14687
Reviewed-By: Heikki Linnakangas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170603165939.1436.58887@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch: 9.5-
pg_resetwal (formerly pg_resetxlog) doesn't insist on finding a matching
version number in pg_control, and that seems like an important thing to
preserve since recovering from corrupt pg_control is a prime reason to
need to run it. However, that means you can try to run it against a
data directory of a different major version, which is at best useless
and at worst disastrous. So as to provide some protection against that
type of pilot error, inspect PG_VERSION at startup and refuse to do
anything if it doesn't match. PG_VERSION is read-only after initdb,
so it's unlikely to get corrupted, and even if it were corrupted it would
be easy to fix by hand.
This hazard has been there all along, so back-patch to all supported
branches.
Michael Paquier, with some kibitzing by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f4b8eb91-b934-8a0d-b3cc-68f06e2279d1@enterprisedb.com
If an operator class has no operators or functions, and doesn't need
a STORAGE clause, we emitted "CREATE OPERATOR CLASS ... AS ;" which
is syntactically invalid. Fix by forcing a STORAGE clause to be
emitted anyway in this case.
(At some point we might consider changing the grammar to allow CREATE
OPERATOR CLASS without an opclass_item_list. But probably we'd want to
omit the AS in that case, so that wouldn't fix this pg_dump issue anyway.)
It's been like this all along, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Daniel Gustafsson, tweaked by me to avoid a dangling-pointer bug
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/D9E5FC64-7A37-4F3D-B946-7E4FB468F88A@yesql.se
When stdin is a terminal, it's possible to end a COPY FROM STDIN with
a keyboard EOF signal (typically control-D), and then keep on issuing
SQL commands. One would expect another COPY FROM STDIN to work as well,
but on some platforms it did not. This turns out to be because we were
not resetting the stream's feof() flag, and BSD-ish versions of fread()
and fgets() won't attempt to read more data if that's set.
The misbehavior is observed on BSDen (including macOS), but not Linux,
Windows, or SysV-ish Unixen, which makes this a portability bug not
just a missing feature.
Add a clearerr() call to fix the behavior, and improve the prompt that's
issued when copying from a TTY to mention that EOF signals work.
It's been like this forever, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0MCGfYf=JAMiYhO6JPtv9-3ZfBo8fcGeCZ8oMzaw+Z+Q@mail.gmail.com
The POSIX standard does not say that the success return value for
fcntl(F_SETFD) and fcntl(F_SETFL) is zero; it says only that it's not -1.
We had several calls that were making the stronger assumption. Adjust
them to test specifically for -1 for strict spec compliance.
The standard further leaves open the possibility that the O_NONBLOCK
flag bit is not the only active one in F_SETFL's argument. Formally,
therefore, one ought to get the current flags with F_GETFL and store
them back with only the O_NONBLOCK bit changed when trying to change
the nonblock state. In port/noblock.c, we were doing the full pushup
in pg_set_block but not in pg_set_noblock, which is just weird. Make
both of them do it properly, since they have little business making
any assumptions about the socket they're handed. The other places
where we're issuing F_SETFL are working with FDs we just got from
pipe(2), so it's reasonable to assume the FDs' properties are all
default, so I didn't bother adding F_GETFL steps there.
Also, while pg_set_block deserves some points for trying to do things
right, somebody had decided that it'd be even better to cast fcntl's
third argument to "long". Which is completely loony, because POSIX
clearly says the third argument for an F_SETFL call is "int".
Given the lack of field complaints, these missteps apparently are not
of significance on any common platforms. But they're still wrong,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30882.1492800880@sss.pgh.pa.us
This backpatches 51e26c9 and 7220c7b, including both documentation
updates clarifying the checkpoints at the beginning of base backups and
the messages in verbose and progress mdoe of pg_basebackup.
Author: Michael Banck
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21444.1488142764%40sss.pgh.pa.us
We were assigning values near 255 through "char *" pointers. On machines
where char is signed, that's not entirely kosher, and it's reasonable
for compilers to warn about it.
A better solution would be to change the pointer type to "unsigned char *",
but that would be vastly more invasive. For the moment, let's just apply
this simple backpatchable solution.
Aleksander Alekseev
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170220141239.GD12278@e733.localdomain
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2839.1490714708@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commits 89e0bac86 et al replaced newlines with spaces in object names
printed in SQL comments, but we neglected to consider that the same
names are also printed by "pg_restore -l", and a newline would render
the output unparseable by "pg_restore -L". Apply the same replacement
in "-l" output. Since "pg_restore -L" doesn't actually examine any
object names, only the dump ID field that starts each line, this is
enough to fix things for its purposes.
The previous fix was treated as a security issue, and we might have
done that here as well, except that the issue was reported publicly
to start with. Anyway it's hard to see how this could be exploited
for SQL injection; "pg_restore -L" doesn't do much with the file
except parse it for leading integers.
Per bug #14587 from Milos Urbanek. Back-patch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170310155318.1425.30483@wrigleys.postgresql.org
We attached no schema label to comments for procedural languages, casts,
transforms, operator classes, operator families, or text search objects.
The first three categories of objects don't really have schemas, but
pg_dump treats them as if they do, and it seems like the TocEntry fields
for their comments had better match the TocEntry fields for the parent
objects. (As an example of a possible hazard, the type names in a CAST
will be formatted with the assumption of a particular search_path, so
failing to ensure that this same path is active for the COMMENT ON command
could lead to an error or to attaching the comment to the wrong cast.)
In the last six cases, this was a flat-out error --- possibly mine to
begin with, but it was a long time ago.
The security label for a procedural language was likewise not correctly
labeled as to schema, and both the comment and security label for a
procedural language were not correctly labeled as to owner.
In simple cases the restore would accidentally work correctly anyway, since
these comments and security labels would normally get emitted right after
the owning object, and so the search path and active user would be correct
anyhow. But it could fail in corner cases; for example a schema-selective
restore would omit comments it should include.
Giuseppe Broccolo noted the oversight, and proposed the correct fix, for
text search dictionary objects; I found the rest by cross-checking other
dumpComment() calls. These oversights are ancient, so back-patch all
the way.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFzmHiWwwzLjzwM4x5ki5s_PDMR6NrkipZkjNnO3B0xEpBgJaA@mail.gmail.com
When performing a pg_upgrade, we copy the files behind pg_largeobject
and pg_largeobject_metadata, allowing us to avoid having to dump out and
reload the actual data for large objects and their ACLs.
Unfortunately, that isn't all of the information which can be associated
with large objects. Currently, we also support COMMENTs and SECURITY
LABELs with large objects and these were being silently dropped during a
pg_upgrade as pg_dump would skip everything having to do with a large
object and pg_upgrade only copied the tables mentioned to the new
cluster.
As the file copies happen after the catalog dump and reload, we can't
simply include the COMMENTs and SECURITY LABELs in pg_dump's binary-mode
output but we also have to include the actual large object definition as
well. With the definition, comments, and security labels in the pg_dump
output and the file copies performed by pg_upgrade, all of the data and
metadata associated with large objects is able to be successfully pulled
forward across a pg_upgrade.
In 9.6 and master, we can simply adjust the dump bitmask to indicate
which components we don't want. In 9.5 and earlier, we have to put
explciit checks in in dumpBlob() and dumpBlobs() to not include the ACL
or the data when in binary-upgrade mode.
Adjustments made to the privileges regression test to allow another test
(large_object.sql) to be added which explicitly leaves a large object
with a comment in place to provide coverage of that case with
pg_upgrade.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170221162655.GE9812@tamriel.snowman.net
The recovery.conf file that's generated is specifically for
replication, and not needed (or wanted) for regular backup restore, so
indicate that in the message.
In 9.5, the default pg_ctl stop mode was changed from "smart" to "fast".
pg_upgrade still thought the default mode was "smart" and only specified
the mode when "fast" was asked for. This results in using "fast" all
the time. It's not clear what the effect in practice is, but fix it
nonetheless to restore the previous behavior.
pg_restore will currently accept invalid values for the number of
parallel jobs to run (eg: -1), unlike pg_dump which does check that the
value provided is reasonable.
Worse, '-1' is actually a valid, independent, parameter (as an alias for
--single-transaction), leading to potentially completely unexpected
results from a command line such as:
-> pg_restore -j -1
Where a user would get neither parallel jobs nor a single-transaction.
Add in validity checking of the parallel jobs option, as we already have
in pg_dump, before we try to open up the archive. Also move the check
that we haven't been asked to run more parallel jobs than possible on
Windows to the same place, so we do all the option validity checking
before opening the archive.
Back-patch all the way, though for 9.2 we're adding the Windows-specific
check against MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS as that check wasn't back-patched
originally.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170110044815.GC18360%40tamriel.snowman.net
Including the program name twice is not helpful:
-> pg_dump -j -1
pg_dump: pg_dump: invalid number of parallel jobs
Correct by removing the progname from the exit_horribly() call used when
validating the number of parallel jobs.
Noticed while testing various pg_dump error cases.
Back-patch to 9.3 where parallel pg_dump was added.
The -v/--verbose option was not included in the output from --help for
pg_dumpall even though it's in the pg_dumpall documentation and has
apparently been around since pg_dumpall was reimplemented in C in 2002.
Fix that by adding it.
Pointed out by Daniel Westermann.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2020970042.4589542.1482482101585.JavaMail.zimbra%40dbi-services.com
When providing tab completion for ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES, we are
including the list of roles as possible options for completion after the
GRANT or REVOKE. Further, we accept FOR ROLE/IN SCHEMA at the same time
and in either order, but the tab completion was only working for one or
the other. Lastly, we weren't using the actual list of allowed kinds of
objects for default privileges for completion after the 'GRANT X ON' but
instead were completeing to what 'GRANT X ON' supports, which isn't the
ssame at all.
Address these issues by improving the forward tab-completion for ALTER
DEFAULT PRIVILEGES and then constrain and correct how the tail
completion is done when it is for ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES.
Back-patch the forward/tail tab-completion to 9.6, where we made it easy
to handle such cases.
For 9.5 and earlier, correct the initial tab-completion to at least be
correct as far as it goes and then add a check for GRANT/REVOKE to only
tab-complete when the GRANT/REVOKE is the start of the command, so we
don't try to do tab-completion after we get to the GRANT/REVOKE part of
the ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES command, which is better than providing
incorrect completions.
Initial patch for master and 9.6 by Gilles Darold, though I cleaned it
up and added a few comments. All bugs in the 9.5 and earlier patch are
mine.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1614593c-e356-5b27-6dba-66320a9bc68b@dalibo.com
