Tom Lane 82eafabeaa Improve docs about using ORDER BY to control aggregate input order. ... David Johnston pointed out that the original text here had been obsoleted by SQL:2008, which allowed ORDER BY in subqueries. We could weaken the text to describe ORDER-BY-in-subqueries as an optional SQL feature that's possibly unportable; but then the exact same statements would apply to the alternative it's being compared to (ORDER-BY-in-aggregate-calls). So really that would be pretty useless; let's just take out the sentence entirely. Instead, point out the hazard that any extra processing in the upper query might cause the subquery output order to be destroyed. Discussion: <CAKFQuwbAX=iO9QbpN7_jr+BnUWm9FYX8WbEPUvG0p+nZhp6TZg@mail.gmail.com>		2016-05-21 12:55:31 -04:00
..
src	Improve docs about using ORDER BY to control aggregate input order.	2016-05-21 12:55:31 -04:00
bug.template	Stamp 9.6beta1.	2016-05-09 16:47:49 -04:00
KNOWN_BUGS	Remove extra newlines at end and beginning of files, add missing newlines	2010-08-19 05:57:36 +00:00
Makefile	Remove maintainer-check target, fold into normal build	2013-10-10 20:11:56 -04:00
MISSING_FEATURES	Remove extra newlines at end and beginning of files, add missing newlines	2010-08-19 05:57:36 +00:00
TODO	Update URL.	2008-08-21 20:15:31 +00:00