mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2026-03-12 05:32:27 -04:00
b577743000
Replace the hardcoded value with a GUC such that the iteration count can be raised in order to increase protection against brute-force attacks. The hardcoded value for SCRAM iteration count was defined to be 4096, which is taken from RFC 7677, so set the default for the GUC to 4096 to match. In RFC 7677 the recommendation is at least 15000 iterations but 4096 is listed as a SHOULD requirement given that it's estimated to yield a 0.5s processing time on a mobile handset of the time of RFC writing (late 2015). Raising the iteration count of SCRAM will make stored passwords more resilient to brute-force attacks at a higher computational cost during connection establishment. Lowering the count will reduce computational overhead during connections at the tradeoff of reducing strength against brute-force attacks. There are however platforms where even a modest iteration count yields a too high computational overhead, with weaker password encryption schemes chosen as a result. In these situations, SCRAM with a very low iteration count still gives benefits over weaker schemes like md5, so we allow the iteration count to be set to one at the low end. The new GUC is intentionally generically named such that it can be made to support future SCRAM standards should they emerge. At that point the value can be made into key:value pairs with an undefined key as a default which will be backwards compatible with this. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Reviewed-by: Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/F72E7BC7-189F-4B17-BF47-9735EB72C364@yesql.se |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auth-sasl.c | ||
| auth-scram.c | ||
| auth.c | ||
| be-fsstubs.c | ||
| be-gssapi-common.c | ||
| be-secure-common.c | ||
| be-secure-gssapi.c | ||
| be-secure-openssl.c | ||
| be-secure.c | ||
| crypt.c | ||
| hba.c | ||
| ifaddr.c | ||
| Makefile | ||
| meson.build | ||
| pg_hba.conf.sample | ||
| pg_ident.conf.sample | ||
| pqcomm.c | ||
| pqformat.c | ||
| pqmq.c | ||
| pqsignal.c | ||
| README.SSL | ||
src/backend/libpq/README.SSL
SSL
===
>From the servers perspective:
Receives StartupPacket
|
|
(Is SSL_NEGOTIATE_CODE?) ----------- Normal startup
| No
|
| Yes
|
|
(Server compiled with USE_SSL?) ------- Send 'N'
| No |
| |
| Yes Normal startup
|
|
Send 'S'
|
|
Establish SSL
|
|
Normal startup
>From the clients perspective (v6.6 client _with_ SSL):
Connect
|
|
Send packet with SSL_NEGOTIATE_CODE
|
|
Receive single char ------- 'S' -------- Establish SSL
| |
| '<else>' |
| Normal startup
|
|
Is it 'E' for error ------------------- Retry connection
| Yes without SSL
| No
|
Is it 'N' for normal ------------------- Normal startup
| Yes
|
Fail with unknown
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ephemeral DH
============
Since the server static private key ($DataDir/server.key) will
normally be stored unencrypted so that the database backend can
restart automatically, it is important that we select an algorithm
that continues to provide confidentiality even if the attacker has the
server's private key. Ephemeral DH (EDH) keys provide this and more
(Perfect Forward Secrecy aka PFS).
N.B., the static private key should still be protected to the largest
extent possible, to minimize the risk of impersonations.
Another benefit of EDH is that it allows the backend and clients to
use DSA keys. DSA keys can only provide digital signatures, not
encryption, and are often acceptable in jurisdictions where RSA keys
are unacceptable.
The downside to EDH is that it makes it impossible to use ssldump(1)
if there's a problem establishing an SSL session. In this case you'll
need to temporarily disable EDH (see initialize_dh()).