* Reinstate the accidentally deleted experimental testing page
* try removing nav reference as it is hidden anyway
* try nesting the nav reference?
* try nesting with the other module pages
The current documentation wording seems to suggest that the only `.netrc` file that will be considered by Terraform is the one sitting in the current user's HOME directory. However, unless I am missing something, Terraform uses `go-getter` to fetch remote modules which mean that the `NETRC` environment variable will also be respected and, in fact, will take precedence over any `.netrc` file on the user's home directory.
See: f7a8c48a1f/netrc.go (L23-L36)
Co-authored-by: Matthew Garrell <69917312+mgarrell777@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Laura Pacilio <83350965+laurapacilio@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kevin Wang <kwangsan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Judith Malnick <judith@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Atkins <mart@degeneration.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: HashiBot <62622282+hashibot-web@users.noreply.github.com>
There was an unintended regression in go-getter v1.5.9's GitGetter which
caused us to temporarily fork that particular getter into Terraform to
expedite a fix. However, upstream v1.5.10 now includes a
functionally-equivalent fix and so we can heal that fork by upgrading.
We'd also neglected to update the Module Sources docs when upgrading to
go-getter v1.5.9 originally and so we were missing documentation about the
new "depth" argument to enable shadow cloning, which I've added
retroactively here along with documenting its restriction of only
supporting named refs.
This new go-getter release also introduces a new credentials-passing
method for the Google Cloud Storage getter, and so we must incorporate
that into the Terraform-level documentation about module sources.
This is documentation for the first set of refactoring-related features,
all based on the new "moved" blocks in the Terraform language.
I've named the documentation section "refactoring" because in previous
discussions with users that seems to be the term they use to describe the
underlying need.
"moved" blocks are our first language feature intended to meet that need,
although it probably won't be the last as we consider other requirements
in later releases. My intent here is that once we've published this it
should eventually end up being the first result for a web search for the
topic of Terraform refactoring.
