Commit dcb0049523 accidentally changed the final expanded query's
condition to > 2 while rewriting the example into SQL operator notation.
The original query and the preceding rewritten forms all use >= 2,
and view expansion should preserve that qualification. This commit
changes the final condition from > 2 to >= 2.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Reported-by: Yaroslav Saburov <y.saburov@gmail.com>
Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/178248467618.108999.9966122434342474006@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
If an expression containing an aggregate is evaluated above the plan
node that computes the aggregate, as happens with window functions or
with expressions postponed to above the final sort, setrefs.c replaces
the Aggref or WindowFunc with a Var referencing the lower node's
output. For SQL/JSON aggregates such as JSON_ARRAYAGG and
JSON_OBJECTAGG, deparsing the containing JsonConstructorExpr then
failed with "invalid JsonConstructorExpr underlying node type", since
get_json_agg_constructor() did not expect a Var there.
Fix by resolving the Var back to the underlying Aggref or WindowFunc
and deparsing the constructor as if the aggregate were computed at the
current node. The JsonConstructorExpr retains the RETURNING clause
and the ABSENT/NULL ON NULL and WITH UNIQUE options, and the arguments
come from the resolved aggregate, so the original JSON aggregate
syntax is reproduced in full. This mirrors how get_agg_expr() already
looks through such a Var when deparsing a combining aggregate.
Reported-by: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA-aLv5QYTaMOk=Qhv6cgwceeHETZV8YJvWZ_rH+yVZCuchATA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 16
If the string is preceded only by Case Ignorable characters, don't
consider it to be a final sigma.
In the process, refactor so that the preceding and following
characters are found first, and then the rule is applied, to improve
clarity.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c355354e6c3f4a7aafb047361b73db247260fca0.camel@j-davis.com
Backpatch-through: 18
Adding a GRANT caused pg_dump to emit a useless REVOKE + GRANT of owner
privileges, as seen in a dump of the regression database:
REVOKE ALL ON PROPERTY GRAPH graph_rls_schema.cabinet FROM nm;
GRANT ALL ON PROPERTY GRAPH graph_rls_schema.cabinet TO nm;
GRANT ALL ON PROPERTY GRAPH graph_rls_schema.cabinet TO PUBLIC;
For normal dumps, this has no functional consequences. For --no-owner
restores, the extra statements may fail or locate unrelated users of the
destination cluster.
The problem was pg_dump assuming NULL relacl implies acldefault('r'),
the default for TABLE. Fix by teaching acldefault() to retrieve the
PROPERTY GRAPH default ACL. So pg_dump can still dump from 19beta1, use
acldefault('g') for v20+ only. For v19, use a hard-coded snapshot of
the v19 default.
information_schema.pg_property_graph_privileges also misused
acldefault('r'), but its "c.prtype IN ('SELECT')" predicate compensated
for it. Switch to the new acldefault('g') for clarity. Bump catversion
since a new view won't work with old binaries. Back-patch to v19, which
introduced PROPERTY GRAPH.
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20260630023308.c7.noahmisch@microsoft.com
Backpatch-through: 19
The previous commit strengthened a workaround for a hang when large
messages are split across TLS records/GSS tokens. Because that
workaround is implemented in libpq internals, it can only help us when
libpq itself is polling on the socket. In nonblocking situations,
where the client above libpq is expected to poll, the same bugs can
show up.
As a contrived example, consider a large protocol-2.0 error coming
back from a server during PQconnectPoll(), split in an odd way across
two records:
-- TLS record (8192-byte payload) --
EEEE[...repeated a total of 8192 times]
-- TLS record (8193-byte payload) --
EEEE[...repeated a total of 8192 times]\0
The first record will fill the first half of the libpq receive buffer,
which is 16k long by default. The second record completely fills the
last half with its first 8192 bytes, leaving the terminating NULL in
the OpenSSL buffer. Since we still haven't seen the terminator at our
level, PQconnectPoll() will return PGRES_POLLING_READING, expecting to
come back when the server has sent "the rest" of the data. But there
is nothing left to read from the socket; OpenSSL had to pull all of
the data in the 8193-byte record off of the wire to decrypt it.
A real server would probably not split up the records this way, nor
keep the connection open after sending a fatal connection error. But
servers that regularly use larger TLS records can get the libpq
receive buffer into the same state if DataRows are big enough, as
reported on the list. While the PostgreSQL server doesn't use larger
TLS records like that, other non-PostgreSQL servers that implement the
wire protocol are known to do that, as well as proxies that sit
between the server and the client
This is a layering violation. libpq makes decisions based on data in
the application buffer, above the transport buffer (whether SSL or
GSS), but clients are polling the socket below the transport buffer.
One way to fix this in a backportable way, without changing APIs too
much, is to ensure data never stays in the transport buffer. Then
pqReadData's postconditions will look similar for both raw sockets and
SSL/GSS: any available data is either in the application buffer, or
still on the socket.
Building on the prior commit, make pqReadData() to drain all pending
data from the transport layer into conn->inBuffer, expanding the
buffer as necessary. This is not particularly efficient from an
architectural perspective (the pqsecure_read() implementations take
care to fit their packets into the current buffer, and that effort is
now completely discarded), but it's hopefully easier to reason about
than a full rewrite would be for the back branches.
Author: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: solai v <solai.cdac@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Lars Kanis <lars@greiz-reinsdorf.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2039ac58-d3e0-434b-ac1a-2a987f3b4cb1%40greiz-reinsdorf.de
Backpatch-through: 14
An extra check for pending bytes in the SSL layer has been part of
pqReadReady() for a very long time (79ff2e96d). But when GSS transport
encryption was added, it didn't receive the same treatment. (As
79ff2e96d notes, "The bug that I fixed in this patch is exceptionally
hard to reproduce reliably.")
Without that check, it's possible to hit a hang in gssencmode, if the
server splits a large libpq message such that the final message in a
streamed response is part of the same wrapped token as the split
message:
DataRowDataRowDataRowDataRowDataRowData
-- token boundary --
RowDataRowCommandCompleteReadyForQuery
If the split message takes up enough memory to nearly fill libpq's
receive buffer, libpq may return from pqReadData() before the later
messages are pulled out of the PqGSSRecvBuffer. Without additional
socket activity from the server, pqReadReady() (via pqSocketCheck())
will never again return true, hanging the connection.
Pull the pending-bytes check into the pqsecure API layer, where both
SSL and GSS now implement it.
Note that this does not fix the root problem! Third party clients of
libpq have no way to call pqsecure_read_is_pending() in their own
polling. This just brings the GSS implementation up to par with the
existing SSL workaround; a broader fix is left to a subsequent commit.
In preparation for the broader fix, this patch already changes the
*_read_pending() functions to return the number of bytes in the buffer
rather than just a boolean. The current callers don't need that, but
the subsequent fix will.
Author: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOYmi%2BmpymrgZ76Jre2dx_PwRniS9YZojwH0rZnTuiGHCsj0rA%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
Three error messages were using the default file name pg_hosts.conf
and not the variable backing the GUC, which would make logging be
confusing for users who have renamed the file using the GUC. Fix
by consistently using the HostsFileName variable.
Backpatch down to v19 where serverside SNI was introduced.
Author: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
Reviewed-by: Surya Poondla <suryapoondla4@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAN4CZFMARYjQfgyRaCKOXDO=Q91kuKn=pSC02DAOOr23ojhEGQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 19
ParallelBackupStart() stored _beginthreadex()'s return value as the
worker's thread handle without checking it. On failure that value is 0,
which would later reach WaitForMultipleObjects() as a null handle, caught
only by an Assert. The fork() path already calls pg_fatal() when it
fails; do the same for _beginthreadex(), as pgbench does.
Author: Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8c712d76-ecf7-4749-a6d8-dddc01f298ec@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
9d9c02ccd added code to allow the executor to stop early when processing
WindowAgg nodes where a monotonic window function starts producing
values that result in a pushed-down qual no longer matching, and will
never match again due to the window function's monotonic properties.
That commit requires a SupportRequestWFuncMonotonic to exist on the
window function and for it to detect when the function is monotonic. For
COUNT(ANY) and COUNT(*), the support function failed to consider some
cases where the WindowClause used EXCLUDE to exclude certain rows from
being aggregated. Some WindowClause definitions mean we aggregate rows
that come after the current row, and when processing those rows later,
if we EXCLUDE certain rows, the monotonic property can be broken.
Wrongly treating the COUNT(*) or COUNT(ANY) aggregate as monotonic could
lead to rows being filtered that should not be filtered from the result
set.
Another issue was that the support function for the COUNT aggregate
mistakenly thought that a WindowClause without an ORDER BY meant that
the results would be both monotonically increasing and decreasing, but
that's only true when in RANGE mode, where all rows are peers.
It is possible to support various cases that do have an EXCLUDE clause,
but getting the logic correct for the exact set of cases that are valid
is quite complex and would likely better be left for a future project.
Here, we mostly disable run condition pushdown when there is an EXCLUDE
clause unless the clause is for EXCLUDE CURRENT ROW, uses COUNT(*)
(rather than COUNT(ANY)), and the window aggregate has no FILTER clause.
Bug: #19533
Reported-by: Qifan Liu <imchifan@163.com>
Author: Chengpeng Yan <chengpeng_yan@outlook.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19533-413a1014e5d0e766@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 15
Commit 28972b6fc should have done this, but didn't.
While at it, remove an extra blank line in fetch_remote_statistics()
introduced by that commit.
Reported-by: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Co-authored-by: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Co-authored-by: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6ED81190-B398-44C9-A1E9-8EFE4ED183AF%40gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 19
When GROUP BY ALL was added in commit ef38a4d975, the SQL standard
working draft was silent on what to do with window functions. This
has now been fixed in the SQL standard working draft. Update the
documentation and code comments about that.
Also make the documentation more specific that we are only talking
about aggregate functions referring to the same query level, which is
another thing that has been made more precise in the SQL standard
working draft since.
The PostgreSQL implementation was already doing the right thing for
both aspects, so no functionality changes.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAHM0NXjz0kDwtzoe-fnHAqPB1qA8_VJN0XAmCgUZ%2BiPnvP5LbA%40mail.gmail.com
transformJsonBehavior() coerced an ON EMPTY / ON ERROR DEFAULT
expression only when its type differed from the RETURNING type's OID.
When the base type matched but the RETURNING type carried a type
modifier (e.g. numeric(4,1) or varchar(3)), the coercion that enforces
the typmod was skipped, so the DEFAULT value could violate the
declared type:
SELECT JSON_VALUE(jsonb '{}', '$.a'
RETURNING numeric(4,1) DEFAULT 99999.999 ON EMPTY);
returned 99999.999, which 99999.999::numeric(4,1) would reject; the
value could even be stored into a numeric(4,1) column, as later
coercions trust its already-correct type label.
Fix by also coercing when the RETURNING type has a typmod, except for
a NULL constant. coerce_to_target_type() is a no-op when the typmod
already matches. The matching-OID short-circuit dates to 74c96699be.
Reported-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Author: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAON2xHPO9f4cAmyGn1mQ=VqoS7wN5rz4yOiqudxX78zninZpCw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
We forgot to use the PG_MODULE_MAGIC_EXT in some newly added modules:
pg_plan_advice, pg_stash_advice and the pgrepack output plugin and
instead used the older PG_MODULE_MAGIC macro.
Author: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/ad7b910c-d145-4120-994d-2e55c456aa75@proxel.se
Backpatch-through: 19
The loop in MatchText() processed a leading '\' without regard to
nondeterministic locales, which is problematic if what the '\'
precedes is an ordinary character that should be subject to
nondeterministic matching. We'd insist on a literal match for it,
which is not right and is not like what happens with a '\' that
follows some ordinary characters. Worse, we'd then advance the text
and pattern pointers by one byte, so that if the escaped character
is multibyte the next loop iteration would take the nondeterministic
code path starting at a point within the character. That could very
possibly cause pg_strncoll() to misbehave.
The fix is quite simple: move the stanza that handles '\' down past
the one that handles nondeterminism. The stanzas for '%' and '_'
are fine where they are, but the '\' stanza is only correct for
deterministic matching. The logic for nondeterministic cases is
already prepared to do the right things with a '\'.
While here, I replaced tests of "locale && !locale->deterministic"
with a boolean local variable, reasoning that those are in the hot
loop paths so saving a branch and indirect fetch is worth the
trouble. I also improved a number of related comments.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/391592.1783187986@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 18
Commit 85b7efa1c added support for LIKE with nondeterministic
collations, but it included a bug in the de-escaping logic for
literal pattern substrings. That unconditionally skipped all
backslashes, but when it encounters '\\' it should emit the second
backslash as a de-escaped character. That led to acting as though
the escaped backslash was not there.
Bug: #19474
Reported-by: Bowen Shi <zxwsbg12138@gmail.com>
Author: Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19474-5b86a95f3d9a7ecb@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH5HC94yU+K8Gcdy12M5BS8gwD_SXLSHzc9k5tNk7JDnpBiFMA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
Commit 85b7efa1c introduced support for LIKE with non-deterministic
collations. By moving some conditionals around, it accidentally broke
the optimization for converting a LIKE or regex exact-match pattern
to an equality indexqual when the index collation doesn't match the
expression collation. That should be allowed if the expression
collation is deterministic. This patch re-introduces the optimization
for that common case.
One important beneficiary of this optimization is the "\d tablename"
command in psql. Without this fix that will do a seqscan on pg_class
instead of an index point lookup.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DHBQIZX8SZVI.ZX614ZMFL645@jeltef.nl
Backpatch-through: 18
Commit 2f094e7ac6 added a mention of SECURITY LABEL ON PROPERTY GRAPH
to the SECURITY LABEL reference page, and it added support to psql tab
completion. However, security labels on property graphs are not
actually supported (per SecLabelSupportsObjectType()). The syntax
does work, but that is just a result of how gram.y is factored. We
don't document or tab-complete the syntax of SECURITY LABEL for other
object types that are not actually supported, so it was inconsistent
to do this for property graphs. Thus, remove this.
Reported-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20260704221210.08.noahmisch%40microsoft.com
With virtual generated columns there is no column to assign to, and we
shouldn't assign directly to stored generated columns either. (Once
we have PERIODs, we will allow a stored generated column here, but we
will assign to its start/end inputs.)
We can't do this in parse analysis, because views haven't yet been
rewritten, so they mask generated columns.
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/agOOykf2HV26yVfU%40nathan
The planner has two optimizations that move a qual clause across a
grouping boundary: subquery_planner transfers HAVING clauses to WHERE
so they can be evaluated before aggregation, and qual_is_pushdown_safe
pushes outer restriction clauses into a subquery past its DISTINCT,
DISTINCT ON, window PARTITION BY, or set-operation grouping layer.
Both produce wrong results when the moved clause's equivalence
relation disagrees with the grouping's, since the clause then filters
rows the grouping would have merged.
The disagreement has two forms. A type may belong to multiple btree
opfamilies whose equality operators disagree (e.g. record_ops vs
record_image_ops); or the grouping may use a nondeterministic
collation, where comparing the column under a different collation, or
wrapping it in a function or operator, can distinguish values the
collation considers equal. Because we cannot prove an arbitrary
expression preserves that equality, a grouping column with a
nondeterministic collation is safe to push only as a direct operand of
a comparison under its own collation.
Fix both call sites through a shared walker parameterized by a
callback that maps each Var to the grouping equality operator for its
column (or InvalidOid for non-grouping Vars). For HAVING, the
callback recovers the SortGroupClause's eqop via the GROUP Var's
varattno, which requires running before flatten_group_exprs while
havingQual still contains GROUP Vars. For subquery pushdown, the
callback recovers the eqop from subquery->distinctClause, a window's
partitionClause, or any grouping node in the SetOperationStmt tree.
The walker fires only when there is an equivalence boundary to cross,
gated by either the existing UNSAFE_NOTIN_DISTINCTON_CLAUSE and
UNSAFE_NOTIN_PARTITIONBY_CLAUSE flags or by a recursive check for any
grouping node in the set-op tree.
Back-patch to v18 only. The HAVING half relies on the RTE_GROUP
mechanism introduced in v18 (commit 247dea89f), which is what lets us
identify grouping expressions via GROUP Vars on pre-flatten
havingQual. Pre-v18 branches lack that machinery, so a back-patch
there would need a different approach. Given the absence of field
reports of these bugs on back branches, the risk of carrying a
different fix on stable branches is not justified.
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Reviewed-by: Florin Irion <irionr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chengpeng Yan <chengpeng_yan@outlook.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-QLZpn3UVOpeG2fOxxhdnkDNMZ_3Zcm3dqJwRAphz68g@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
"prev_tuple" was overwritten with a new tuple coming from
CopyIndexTuple() on each loop, leaking memory for every tuple processed
on entry tree pages. The function uses a dedicated memory context, but
this could leave unused large areas of memory while processing a large
GIN index, the larger the worse.
Oversight in 14ffaece0f.
Author: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALdSSPjTS6TYe5=5NfMUBYZyQu5cn=ABL6K5_OZjzGWqnwXeBw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
psql decided whether to use the pager in expanded output without
accounting for possible wrapping of column values. This could
allow it to not use the pager in cases where it should do so.
To fix, move the IsPagerNeeded decision in print_aligned_vertical()
down until after the wrapped data width is known. Then, if we're in
wrapped mode, prepare a width_wrap array specifying that width (which,
in vertical mode, is the same for all columns).
This is fixing an omission in 27da1a796, so back-patch to v19
where that came in.
Author: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/A44110E7-6A03-4C67-95AD-527192A6C768@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 19
AlterPropGraph() cleans up pg_propgraph_property entries that are
orphaned by dropping an element or by dropping properties associated
with an element. But it did not clean up pg_propgraph_property
entries that are orphaned by dropping labels associated with an
element. Fix this missing case.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Author: zengman <zengman@halodbtech.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/tencent_76F6ACA2364EAA1E5DBD7A47%40qq.com
ON SELECT rules must be named "_RETURN", while other kinds of rules
must not be; this ancient restriction is depended on by various client
code. We successfully enforced this convention in most places, but
ALTER RULE allowed renaming a non-SELECT rule to "_RETURN". Notably,
that would break dump/restore, since the eventual CREATE RULE command
would reject the name.
While at it, remove DefineQueryRewrite's hack to substitute "_RETURN"
for the convention that was used before 7.3. We dropped other
server-side code that supported restoring pre-7.3 dumps some time ago
(notably in e58a59975 and nearby commits), but this bit was missed.
Bug: #19543
Reported-by: Adam Pickering <adamkpickering@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19543-461228e77f3b32fc@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
getObjectDescription() currently constructs property graph-related
object descriptions incrementally with appendStringInfo(). This
effectively fixes the word order in English, which makes the messages
difficult to translate naturally into languages such as Japanese.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20260528.121622.1662808269492494574.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
We were skipping a bunch of things that are mostly unnecessary for
REPACK. However, one thing that seems would be better to pass closer to
truth, is the updatedCols bitmapset in the range table entry for the
repacked table. Cons up an RTE and install it into the EState.
This only has an effect on btree indexes, because certain operations are
optimized in the case of unchanged columns; and even then, correctnesss
is not being compromised.
The values we pass after this commit are not fully trustworthy either,
because we simply say "all columns were updated" for all insert/updates,
regardless of whether their values were actually modified or not.
However, this way we err to the side of caution rather than to the
opposite direction as we were originally doing. This could be refined
in the future, but there's a trade-off: determining whether the column
was in fact updated could be expensive.
Author: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 19
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18222.1782126731@localhost
gbt_var_consistent() handled the <> (BtreeGistNotEqual) strategy without
distinguishing leaf from internal pages, unlike every other strategy.
In particular, it tried to apply the datatype-specific f_eq method,
which is completely wrong since internal keys might not have the same
representation as leaf keys. This led to OOB reads and potentially
crashes, and most likely to wrong query results as well.
On leaf pages we can apply the inverse of what the Equal strategy does.
On internal pages, use a correct implementation of what the previous
code intended: we can descend if the query value equals both bounds,
*so long as the bounds aren't truncated*. With truncated bounds we
don't quite know the range of what's below, so we must always descend.
Adjust the code in gbt_num_consistent() to look similar, too. This
fixes a performance buglet in that there's no need to do two comparisons
on a leaf entry, but the main point is just to keep code consistency.
Reported-by: 王跃林 <violin0613@tju.edu.cn>
Author: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
Backpatch-through: 14
If we're dealing with leaf entries, the function to call is bitcmp
not byteacmp. Using byteacmp didn't lead to any obvious failure,
but it did result in sorting the entries in a way not matching the
datatype's actual sort order. Hence the constructed index would be
less efficient than one would expect, and in particular worse than
what you got before this code was added in v18 (by commit e4309f73f).
We might want to recommend that users reindex btree_gist indexes
on bit/varbit columns.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
Backpatch-through: 18
Commit ce146621 ensures that ERROR is raised if a session tries to read
pages of another session's temp table. But there is a corner case where
the other session's temp table is empty -- in this case the INSERT
command bypasses our checks and executes without any errors.
Such behavior is inconsistent and erroneous: it leaves an invalid buffer
in the temp buffers pool. Since the buffer was created for another
session's temp table, we get an error "no such file or directory" when
trying to flush it.
This commit fixes it by adding a RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP check in the
relation-extension path.
Backpatch to 16, because it is the first release after 31966b151e, which
introduced a separate local relation extension function
ExtendBufferedRelLocal(), which lacks of RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP() check.
As this fix introduces more checks to 013_temp_obj_multisession.pl, backpatch
the whole test script to 16.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJDiXgiX2XZBHDNo%2BzBbvku%2BtchrUurvPRaN1_40mEQ1_sG90g%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>
Reviewed-by: Imran Zaheer <imran.zhir@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: ZizhuanLiu X-MAN <44973863@qq.com>
Backpatch-through: 16
When dropping a property by name from a label, the code checked only
whether the property existed in the graph's property catalog. It did
not verify that the property was actually associated with the given
label, resulting in passing InvalidOid to performDeletion(). Fix it
by explicilty checking the label property association.
While at it also rearrange the code so as to avoid multiple ereport
calls for the same error in the same block.
Author: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1DA5D52A-4AFA-426E-83F7-42ED974D682B%40gmail.com
BackendKeyData length was increased from 4 bytes to a variable-length
length (up to 256 bytes) in a460251f0a. However, pqTrace still traces
it as a 4 bytes key, leading to a "mismatched message length" warning
message. The same issue impacts the tracing of CancelRequest.
This patch fixes the issue by using pqTraceOutputNchar instead of
pqTraceOutputInt32 in both cases.
Author: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAO6_Xqo6gTv9=76H=k2qDRFU+KHuBiY2S=bQynEr6J8gS7L6xA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
In order to replay concurrent changes, REPACK CONCURRENTLY needs the
pg_attrdef tuples for the transient table to be there, in case a tuple
is modified concurrently with REPACK and requires to store the value
from the generated column (which, with the current arrangements, means
all tuples concurrently updated or inserted). Fix by creating a copy of
them from the original table. Add a test that tickles the bug.
Author: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Reported-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Diagnosed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 19
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAON2xHMrELwx9vKg6niSf8fMBA=-MGXmG=MPQU6+vMVhGjF8kQ@mail.gmail.com
Per SQL/PGQ standard, every graph element must have at least one
label. When dropping a label from a graph element, ensure that there
exists at least one other label on the element. If the label being
dropped is the only label on the element, raise an error.
We hold a ShareRowExclusiveLock when modifying a property graph.
Hence the label will not be dropped even when multiple labels are
being dropped concurrently.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Author: Satyanarayana Narlapuram <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Satyanarayana Narlapuram <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHg+QDeP=mTHTV48R23zKMy1SBmCKZ_L7-z5zKnYyw+K0x-gCg@mail.gmail.com
Commit fb421231da extended \df to include procedures, but its tab
completion continued not to show procedures.
Update \df tab completion to include procedures as well.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Reviewed-by: Surya Poondla <suryapoondla4@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10fbfdfe-80f6-4ef9-b8b3-f7be0eb53a50@ewie.name
Backpatch-through: 14
Previously, MultiXactId wraparound hints suggested dropping stale
replication slots. While that advice is appropriate for transaction ID
wraparound, where replication slots can hold back XID horizons,
it was misleading for MultiXactId wraparound. Following it could lead
users to drop replication slots unnecessarily without helping resolve
the MultiXactId wraparound condition.
MultiXact cleanup is not directly delayed by replication slots.
Instead, it depends on whether old MultiXactIds can still be seen
as live by running transactions.
This commit removes the replication slot advice from MultiXactId
wraparound hints, and documents that stale replication slots are
normally not relevant to resolving MultiXactId wraparound problems.
Backpatch to all supported branches.
BUG #18876
Reported-by: Haruka Takatsuka <harukat@sraoss.co.jp>
Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18876-0d0b53bad5a1f4c1@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
A foreign scan can target a single relation while still reaching the
fs_relids branch of pgpa_build_scan() -- for example, when postgres_fdw
pushes an aggregate down over one foreign table. In that case, no
advice should be emitted.
Author: Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAKYtNAofuAJBz6++SeikpCb=Y=MO1QgEuZNJ+KZOP2johF1r4Q@mail.gmail.com
Previously, test_custom_var_stats and test_custom_fixed_stats silently
skipped pgstat_register_kind() when not loaded via
shared_preload_libraries, behavior inherited from injection_points.
This left the SQL functions callable without the kind registered,
leading to various issues on the backend side.
This code is not designed to work without the pgstats kinds registered.
pgstat_register_kind() gets now called when these libraries are loaded,
with or without shared_preload_libraries, letting the registration fail
if loading the modules at a later step than startup. test_custom_rmgrs
does the same thing.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/akS/ldidWeqG1FWk@bdtpg
Backpatch-through: 19
The jsonpath .decimal(precision[, scale]) method built its numeric
typmod by calling numerictypmodin() through DirectFunctionCall1(), which
can throw a hard error for an incorrect set of precision and/or scale
vaulues. This breaks the silent mode supported by this function, that
should not fail.
Most of the jsonpath code uses the soft error reporting to bypass
errors, which is what this fix does by avoiding a direct use of
numerictypmodin(). Its code is refactored to use a new routine called
make_numeric_typmod_safe(), able to take an error context in input.
numerictypmodin() sets no context, mapping to its previous behavior.
The jsonpath code sets or not a context depending on the use of the
silent mode. This result leads to some nice simplifications:
numerictypmodin() feeds on an array, we can now pass directly values for
the scale and precision.
Oversight in 66ea94e8e6.
Author: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAON2xHMaigKABiyPBBq3Sjd3gp7uWMJXnnMHt=s85V1ij3KP1w@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
The float4 and float8 btree_gist opclasses compared keys with raw C
operators (==, <, >). IEEE 754 makes every comparison involving NaN
false, so GiST disagreed with the regular float comparison operators
and with the btree opclass, which uses float[4|8]_cmp_internal()
(so that all NaNs are equal and NaN sorts after every non-NaN value).
In addition, the penalty and distance functions were not careful
about NaNs, and the penalty functions could also misbehave for IEEE
infinities. Wrong answers from the penalty functions would probably
do no more than make the index non-optimal, but the distance mistakes
were visible from SQL.
To fix, make the comparison functions rely on the same NaN-aware
comparison functions the core code uses, and rewrite the penalty
and distance functions to follow the rules that NaNs are equal
but maximally far away from non-NaNs. The penalty_num() code was
formerly shared between integral and float cases, but I chose to make
two copies so that the integral cases are not saddled with the extra
logic for NaNs and infinities/overflows. I also rewrote it as static
inline functions instead of an unreadable and uncommented macro.
The float penalty functions were previously unreached by the
regression tests, so add new test cases to exercise them.
There's no on-disk format change, but users who have NaN entries
in a btree_gist index would be well advised to reindex it.
Bug: #19501
Bug: #19524
Reported-by: Man Zeng <zengman@halodbtech.com>
Reported-by: Yuelin Wang <3020001251@tju.edu.cn>
Author: Bill Kim <billkimjh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19501-3bff3bbc97f1e7c9@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19524-9559d302c8455664@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMQXxcgbtD2LXfX0tpgvOizxP-XxrCHV2ZDy4By_TZnJMsxXWQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
The descriptions of the component scores state that values greater
than or equal to the corresponding weight parameter mean autovacuum
will process the table. However, since the code that determines
whether to vacuum or analyze a table actually checks whether the
threshold is exceeded, it's more accurate to say "greater than"
there.
Author: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E3ABDC6B-80CA-4C37-BA0B-A519D49F4C66%40gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 19
Previously, if a base backup failed after it had started streaming
files, pg_stat_progress_basebackup could continue to show a stale
progress entry even though the backup was no longer running. This could
be observed when the client kept the replication connection open after
the error. It is normally not observable when using pg_basebackup,
because the client disconnects after the error.
The problem was that progress reporting was cleared only after
successful completion.
This commit moves the progress reporting cleanup into the progress
sink's cleanup callback so that it is cleared after both successful
and failed backups.
Backpatch to v15. v14 has the same issue, but the fix does not apply
cleanly because it lacks the base backup sink infrastructure. Since
the bug does not affect the backup itself and is normally not
observable when using pg_basebackup, skip the v14 backpatch.
Author: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/EA1A6CD2-EFA6-462B-9A02-03003555AB4A@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
Commit bc60ee860 added a connection warning after successful MD5
authentication, but only for the md5 authentication method. A role with
an MD5-encrypted password can also authenticate via the password method,
which left that path without the same deprecation warning.
Emit the MD5 deprecation connection warning after successful
password authentication as well, when the stored password is
MD5-encrypted.
Backpatch to v19, where the MD5 connection warning was introduced.
Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwGkWfn5rtHzvdRbVk+PCefQU3gun3hc7QnaMXHFa5Bu3w@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 19
Fixup for commit c05dee1911. It fits better with the style and APIs
to print separate primary and a detail messages instead of one
multiline message.
Reviewed-by: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PsvQJQnQO0KT0S2oegenkvJ8FUuY-QS5syyqmT24R2xFQ@mail.gmail.com
off_t is most likely a 64-bit integer, so casting it to a 32-bit type
for output could lose data. There are more issues like this in the
tree, but this is an instance where this could actually happen in
practice, since base backups are routinely larger than 4 GB. So this
is separated out as a bug fix.
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20ce62fa-47fc-457b-b504-12f3c1651726%40eisentraut.org
